Child Abduction to Japan

It is being enforced to an extent despite some problems. You can read about it for yourself here.
Three years after Japan signed Hague, parents who abduct still win | The Japan Times
Thanks for the link @Lothor. I read through the article but it really seems like a very minimal effort is made to follow through with enforcement. A lot of this seems to be because the enforcement has no legal ability to enforce and another part is modifications to the convention to basically allow it to not be enforced.
Its a very sad article to read. :(
 
I have little doubt that Japan's track record in these cases (pre and post Hague Convention) comes down to in-group defense of the Japanese parent. If one foreigner took a child to Japan against the wishes of the other foreign parent, the child's return would probably be swift and the success story added to the return statistics. The abducting foreigner would probably be deported and effectively delivered into the hands of authorities waiting to arrest the person at the destination airport.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how this one's going to end... Vincent Fichot, a Frenchman who has been living in Japan for 15 years, began a hunger strike in Tokyo Saturday in a protest against the alleged abduction of his children by his former Japanese wife. He hopes to bring international attention to his fight to be reunited with his family.

vincent-fichon.jpg


"I've given everything, I've lost my job, my house and my savings in the last three years. I weigh 80 kilograms now, and I'll give it all until the very last gram," Vincent Fichot said, sitting at the entrance to a train station in Tokyo, not far from the new Olympic stadium. Fichot, 39, who has lived in Japan for 15 years, said he will not give up his hunger strike until his children, a boy and a girl aged 6 and 4, are returned to him. Failing that, he said, "I want the French authorities to show me they are serious and that they really want to defend my kids, and that they will impose sanctions against Japan until Japan agrees to protect my children's rights." His wife has accused him in court of domestic violence, Fichot said, but later "retracted" the claim, and the Japanese justice system now has "nothing to reproach me for," he said. "I've tried everything, I've tried to convince my wife by saying to her that it was not good for the kids," he added. "Right now, I don't even know if they are alive."



In 2019, WP covered his story and that of an Italian resident who went through the same experience:

Parental child abduction becomes a diplomatic embarrassment for Japan ahead of G-7.


However, the issue does not only affect foreign parents:

In Japan, divorce can mean losing access to children. Many parents want that to change.

It's quite heartbreaking, and, frankly, I fail to understand why Japanese family law has no provisions for joint custody and visiting rights for non-custodial parents.* It seems to be possible in the case of amicable divorces.



* In fact, the WP article explained the reason behind the absence of such provisions: the continuity of the child's upbringing. More here and here.
 
A few years ago Japan finally signed the Hague Convention but the enforcement has been lacking to say the least. It was supposed to help deal with this type of situation. Important Features of the Hague Abduction Convention - Why the Hague Convention Matters

There have been lots of news stories over the years about this and about the kids being scared into not seeing/talking to the foreign parent. Also about the kids being coached on exactly what to say when the Japanese authorities come to "enforce" a custody decision so that no enforcement actually occurs. The continuity excuse is just that, an excuse used to alienate one of the parents from the children.
 
It's quite heartbreaking, and, frankly, I fail to understand why Japanese family law has no provisions for joint custody and visiting rights for non-custodial parents.* It seems to be possible in the case of amicable divorces.
...and even with non-amicable divorces when the safety of the children is not an issue. My parents had a very messy divorce but visitation rights for my younger siblings (I was about to go to university when they announced their divorce) were never an issue.
 
Vincent is still holding out in front of the Olympic Stadium. You have to respect his tenacity.





They are uploading new videos every day. Days 10 and 11:





 
Yesterday, Fichot ended his hunger strike near the Olympic stadium. According to the media, he fainted and injured his hand. He's lost 14 kilograms over the past 2 weeks.

The European Union ambassadors to Japan met with Vincent Fichot, 39, who is camped out at a train station near the National Stadium, a focus of the ongoing Games, where temperatures regularly top 30 degrees Celsius (85 degrees Fahrenheit) amid sweltering humidity. Fichot's dramatic protest aims to draw attention to the plight of parents like him who are denied custody or visitation of their children in a divorce. Japan, unlike most countries, does not recognise joint custody and children often lose contact with the non-custodial parent.



So far, I haven't seen any report on this issue by Japanese media. It seems Vincent's case was completely ignored.
 
The Japan Times on Fichot's case and parental laws in Japan in general. Legal experts reject the notion that Japan was a "sole custody" country and point out that there are ways that allow divorced nonresident parents to participate in the upbringing of a child - provided the parents are willing to do so. Some parents go to extreme lengths to win parental authority, absconding with their children to establish their de facto status as the resident parent by exaggerating or fabricating claims of domestic violence to discredit the other parent's suitability. This has also happened in Fichot's case.

The system of sole parental authority is, in a sense, a holdover from Japan's prewar patriarchy, when only fathers were made the holders of that right following divorce, under the logic that children belonged to the male parent. Out went this patriarchal system after the war, and in came the principle of equality between fathers and mothers under the new Civil Code, but it remained unchanged that only one of them could be granted parental authority post-divorce. This was due mainly to the belief that allowing both parents to wield power over children would risk "complicating parents' decision-making" in child-rearing matters, according to Masayuki Tanamura, a professor of family law studies at Waseda University. Many fathers continued to assume parental authority in the immediate years after the war. However, mothers soon became the dominant holders of this right as a "men at work, women at home" mentality prevented many fathers from bonding with their children. Today, mothers are afforded parental authority in around 80% of all divorce cases involving children.


 
Its too bad that it seems like the boy being returned to Germany seems to be the exception rather than the rule. :(

Japan seems to have signed the Hague Convention for political reasons only, to alter how they are seen globally, rather than to actually follow its requirements.
 
Officials in France have issued an international arrest warrant for a Japanese woman accused of keeping her two children from their French father, AFP news agency reports.

 
Sadly, that's true; however, the abducting mother will not be able to leave the country. I wouldn't like to have a Red Notice on me.
She'll just have to do some extra research on potential vacation destinations. Thailand, for example, doesn't appear to have an extradition treaty with France.
 
She'll just have to do some extra research on potential vacation destinations. Thailand, for example, doesn't appear to have an extradition treaty with France.

Probably, she would still be flagged and questioned by immigration. Whatever happens, she will have to keep a low profile for years to come, shield her daughters, and hide in Japan. Is that really worth it? Why not just arrange visiting rights for the father of her children?
 
Probably, she would still be flagged and questioned by immigration. Whatever happens, she will have to keep a low profile for years to come, shield her daughters, and hide in Japan. Is that really worth it? Why not just arrange visiting rights for the father of her children?
There could be many reasons. Perhaps he forced her to eat bleu cheese and she hates bleu cheese.
 
Yesterday, the Tokyo Family Court ruled that Fichot's ex-wife, who ran off with her children and refused to let her French husband see them, has the right to their custody.

In the suit, filed by his Japanese wife, the court also granted her divorce from Fichot. Fichot's lawyer said he will appeal the ruling. Presiding Judge Yasushi Ogawara said, however, the woman should let Fichot see their two children and asked the couple to discuss what is best for the children. Fichot, 40, married the woman in 2009 and the two had been living in Tokyo. She ran off with the children in August 2018. The woman claimed she suffered domestic violence while they lived together, but the court did not recognize that abuse occurred.

Sadly, we can assume that she will not comply with the court's recommendations. The legal battle will continue.


 
Recently, GOP Rep. Chris Smith personally delivered a letter to Japan's PM Kishida, urging action to address a pressing issue: the abduction and separation of American children in Japan. These children are taken by one of their respective parents without the other parent's consent. The situation is particularly concerning because these abductions often defy pre-existing court orders and, in some instances, involve the assistance of the Japanese government in obtaining passports for the children. To date, over 500 American children remain separated from their American parents due to these abductions.


Smith's letter cites examples of parents who have been unable to access their children in Japan due in part to Japanese law not recognizing joint custody. One of those parents, Jeffrey Morehouse, has testified at several congressional hearings chaired by Smith about his struggle to gain access to his son Mochi since 2010 despite Japanese law recognizing his legal custody in Washington state. [...] Unlike many other countries, Japan does not allow dual custody of children for their divorced parents. Only one parent can take the children, though the other parent can gain visitation rights. In some cases, the parent with custody blocks contact with the other one. There have been some high-profile cases of custody disputes brought up by foreign husbands divorced from Japanese women accusing them of child abduction.

 
sorry for dredging up an old thread but it seems like there's finally been some kind of change on this front, as Japan is making some big changes to its custody system: Japan rolls out new joint custody system

It's paywalled so here's the article in its entirety:
532244.jpg

Japan rolls out new joint custody system
By Jessica Speed
STAFF WRITER
Mar 31, 2026

Japan will introduce its joint custody system on Wednesday, marking a sweeping overhaul of the country's family law under a revised Civil Code, the first of its kind in over a century.

The change ends Japan's long-standing sole custody framework, under which only one parent could retain parental rights following a divorce. Under the new system, divorcing couples can choose between joint and sole custody through mutual agreement. Couples who have already divorced may petition family courts to switch from their existing arrangements.

Under joint custody, parents are expected to make major decisions together, including those related to a child's education or place of residence. Either parent, however, can act independently on routine matters such as meals and clothing, as well as in urgent situations such as medical emergencies.

If parents cannot agree at the time of divorce, family courts will decide whether joint or sole custody is appropriate, based on the child's best interests. Courts are required to grant sole custody in cases involving a risk of child abuse, or those in which domestic violence would make joint decision-making difficult for parents.
The rollout has drawn mixed reactions from the public. Critics question whether courts are equipped to properly assess risks such as domestic violence, particularly in cases where evidence is limited. Some abuse survivors have voiced concerns that the system could expose them to continued contact with or interference from former partners.
However, proponents say that the new system will put Japan more in line with international standards when it comes to child custody laws.

Applications to change existing sole custody arrangements will not be automatically approved. Courts may reject such requests in cases involving abuse or those in which a parent has failed to pay child support for an extended period without valid justification.

Alongside the custody overhaul, Japan also will introduce a statutory child support system Wednesday aimed at strengthening financial protections for children. Custodial parents will be able to claim a baseline payment of ¥20,000 ($125) per month per child from the nonresident parent, even in the absence of a prior agreement.
The provision is intended as a temporary measure until formal support arrangements are established and will apply to divorces finalized from April.
The revised law also strengthens the enforcement of child support claims when a nonresident parent does not make payment.

Previously, child support claims generally required either an agreement between parents or formal family court procedures. Now, child support claims will be granted priority over other debts through a lien, and enforcement will be possible based on private written agreements between parents, removing the need for notarized documents in some cases.

Payments under the new system will be capped at ¥80,000 per child per month.
It's not exactly redress for the situations described in this thread, but hopefully a change like this means a shift in the landscape that reduces the number of familial child abductions in the future.
 
We have updates in this thread:

 
We have updates in this thread:

oh thanks! I tried a search but missed the thread, should've known I wasn't breaking news here!
 
Back
Top Bottom