- 17 Jul 2002
- 5,907
- 385
As Kjeld mentions in another thread, there have been a lot of migrations from the Asian mainland to the islands of Indonesia and Japan during the ice age. I recommend a very good book on the development and migration of human societies : Guns, Germs, and Steel, by Jared Diamond.
Indonesians, Malaysians and Filipinos actually originate from Southern China. They'd have migrated on boats via Taiwan and displaced the original inhabitants, who might have been related to the Dravidians of Southern India. In Papua-New Guinea, the indigenous people were more numerous and well settled, so that they had to go around them and continued to Polynesia (all the Pacific islands) and New Zealand. With primitive boats, they were able to travel as far as Hawaii or the Easter Islands. Linguistically, all Polynesian languages, from Hawai'i to Fiji and New Zealand, via the Marianas, Kiribati, Tuvalu, etc., are closely related. They are also related to Indonesian languages. Differences between regions increase with the time they were settled, not the distance between them. So, 2 groups of islands in the Pacific might be 500km away, but the inhabitants of one may only have been settled a few generations ago by inhabitants of the other group.
Indonesians ?
I have noticed quite a few similarities between the Bahasa Indonesia/Malaysia and the Japanese language. Apart from the very similar pronunciation in both languages, there are the same hierarchical differences in personal pronouns. For example, "you" is either "anda" or "kamu," with the same meaning and usage as "anata" and "kimi" in Japanese. Likewise, "suki" (好き, to like) translates to "suka" in Bahasa. Such similarities are striking. In both languages, you can make a plural by doubling the word, like wareware in Japanese (ware = I or you, wareware = we). Doubling of words is so common that there is a kanji that only means the word is doubled(" X") in written Japanese. However, it is more common in Bahasa nowadays, where it is almost systematic. Expressions like "ittekimasu, itteirashai, tadaima and okaeri" also exist in Indonesian (selamat jalan, selamat tinggal...), but not in European languages. I am not a specialist of any of these languages at all. I barely know a few words in Indonesian, but it's enough to see the link with Japanese.
Japanese matsuri resemble Balinese ones so much that one could wonder if they are actually from the same country. I've seen a cremation in Bali; they carry the dead body very much like the Japanese carry a mikoshi. Balinese funerals are joyful, and people swing the "mikoshi" in the streets and make loud noise to scare the evil spirits. Basically, Bali is Hindu, but has mixed it with the original animist religion. Shinto is also an animism, and we can see lots of other cultural similarities between non-muslim/non-Christian Indonesia and non-Buddhist Japan. For example, the walls and entrances of traditional houses, and the styles of Balinese temples and Japanese shrines. Buddhism, Islam and Christianity all arrived much later, after the supposed original ancestors of the 2 archipelagoes split from each other, but have radically changed both societies. We have to look for the purely original culture (which might be very difficult nowadays) to find the connection that existed in late prehistoric times.
Koreans ?
Japanese and Korean grammar are very similar. My Koreans acquaintances in Japan told me that some words were also almost identical, such as kazoku, sentaku or hakkiri. Both languages are classified in the Altaic language group. Check this comparison of Altaic languages together.
About half of the Japanese vocabulary comes from Chinese via kanji compounds. However, it seems that there hasn't been any much direct migration from China to Japan, except a few scholars or monks. But ultimately, going back a few millennia, all East Asians are of Chinese-Mongolian origin. Linguistically and culturally, the Japanese are closer to Koreans and Indonesians.
Indonesians, Malaysians and Filipinos actually originate from Southern China. They'd have migrated on boats via Taiwan and displaced the original inhabitants, who might have been related to the Dravidians of Southern India. In Papua-New Guinea, the indigenous people were more numerous and well settled, so that they had to go around them and continued to Polynesia (all the Pacific islands) and New Zealand. With primitive boats, they were able to travel as far as Hawaii or the Easter Islands. Linguistically, all Polynesian languages, from Hawai'i to Fiji and New Zealand, via the Marianas, Kiribati, Tuvalu, etc., are closely related. They are also related to Indonesian languages. Differences between regions increase with the time they were settled, not the distance between them. So, 2 groups of islands in the Pacific might be 500km away, but the inhabitants of one may only have been settled a few generations ago by inhabitants of the other group.
Indonesians ?
I have noticed quite a few similarities between the Bahasa Indonesia/Malaysia and the Japanese language. Apart from the very similar pronunciation in both languages, there are the same hierarchical differences in personal pronouns. For example, "you" is either "anda" or "kamu," with the same meaning and usage as "anata" and "kimi" in Japanese. Likewise, "suki" (好き, to like) translates to "suka" in Bahasa. Such similarities are striking. In both languages, you can make a plural by doubling the word, like wareware in Japanese (ware = I or you, wareware = we). Doubling of words is so common that there is a kanji that only means the word is doubled(" X") in written Japanese. However, it is more common in Bahasa nowadays, where it is almost systematic. Expressions like "ittekimasu, itteirashai, tadaima and okaeri" also exist in Indonesian (selamat jalan, selamat tinggal...), but not in European languages. I am not a specialist of any of these languages at all. I barely know a few words in Indonesian, but it's enough to see the link with Japanese.
Japanese matsuri resemble Balinese ones so much that one could wonder if they are actually from the same country. I've seen a cremation in Bali; they carry the dead body very much like the Japanese carry a mikoshi. Balinese funerals are joyful, and people swing the "mikoshi" in the streets and make loud noise to scare the evil spirits. Basically, Bali is Hindu, but has mixed it with the original animist religion. Shinto is also an animism, and we can see lots of other cultural similarities between non-muslim/non-Christian Indonesia and non-Buddhist Japan. For example, the walls and entrances of traditional houses, and the styles of Balinese temples and Japanese shrines. Buddhism, Islam and Christianity all arrived much later, after the supposed original ancestors of the 2 archipelagoes split from each other, but have radically changed both societies. We have to look for the purely original culture (which might be very difficult nowadays) to find the connection that existed in late prehistoric times.
Koreans ?
Japanese and Korean grammar are very similar. My Koreans acquaintances in Japan told me that some words were also almost identical, such as kazoku, sentaku or hakkiri. Both languages are classified in the Altaic language group. Check this comparison of Altaic languages together.
About half of the Japanese vocabulary comes from Chinese via kanji compounds. However, it seems that there hasn't been any much direct migration from China to Japan, except a few scholars or monks. But ultimately, going back a few millennia, all East Asians are of Chinese-Mongolian origin. Linguistically and culturally, the Japanese are closer to Koreans and Indonesians.
Last edited: