My job, to convince you?
Miwatoshi...you bring up an interesting memory for me. My son taught high school in a very depressed urban area of New Jersey. The entire class was what we would call "ethnic minorities" of a multitude of races and ethnicities and nationalities.
It was massively challenging to my son because he was accused, yes, accused, of not educating some of the students, by some very aggressive, very critical parents. Other parents absolutely praised my son for making the attempt to offer the education, for the children to "step up" and attain the education.
My son diligently prepared the next days class, with some student absorbing every vowel, every clue, every morsel of the points for that day. Other students would socialize during class, become disruptive, and they had their parents to run to and complain that "they were not being educated". And yet, whose job is it to educate the children, if not the children AND the parents AND the teacher, all working together? It was never the teacher having the ENTIRE JOB of educating those children!
The best students, no matter what the background, took the clues and the evidence and the books and all information they could find, and educated themselves.
Likewise, in this thread, it is not my job to convince you of anything. For example, you can't convince me Jacobvic is James, and I can't convince you of Sumerian presence in Bolivia, fine. Tomato, To-mah-to. My job is not to convince you of anything, yet you demand proof or "you will not believe it."
Education is not about force feeding you, a complete stranger of 27 years old, of clues left behind on the Jomon ancestries of the Royal family, by hundreds of millions of people before us. Maybe they are fraudulent clues? Possibly. Maybe the 1000 authors before me "made up their story"? Possibly.
But how many times do you hammer home your OPINION that no clues exist or that I offer no clues or proven evidence? At what point do you become simply annoying with your restatements, and restatements, and restatements?
Let's step forward, now. What addition to this thread do you have regarding the Jomons and the Japanese Royal family?
This is an amazingly good wonderful forum presented by Color Red. I don't know if anything like it exists anywhere else, or if it has ever been presented this way before. And what can you contribute to this wonderful thread?
Miwatoshi...you bring up an interesting memory for me. My son taught high school in a very depressed urban area of New Jersey. The entire class was what we would call "ethnic minorities" of a multitude of races and ethnicities and nationalities.
It was massively challenging to my son because he was accused, yes, accused, of not educating some of the students, by some very aggressive, very critical parents. Other parents absolutely praised my son for making the attempt to offer the education, for the children to "step up" and attain the education.
My son diligently prepared the next days class, with some student absorbing every vowel, every clue, every morsel of the points for that day. Other students would socialize during class, become disruptive, and they had their parents to run to and complain that "they were not being educated". And yet, whose job is it to educate the children, if not the children AND the parents AND the teacher, all working together? It was never the teacher having the ENTIRE JOB of educating those children!
The best students, no matter what the background, took the clues and the evidence and the books and all information they could find, and educated themselves.
Likewise, in this thread, it is not my job to convince you of anything. For example, you can't convince me Jacobvic is James, and I can't convince you of Sumerian presence in Bolivia, fine. Tomato, To-mah-to. My job is not to convince you of anything, yet you demand proof or "you will not believe it."
Education is not about force feeding you, a complete stranger of 27 years old, of clues left behind on the Jomon ancestries of the Royal family, by hundreds of millions of people before us. Maybe they are fraudulent clues? Possibly. Maybe the 1000 authors before me "made up their story"? Possibly.
But how many times do you hammer home your OPINION that no clues exist or that I offer no clues or proven evidence? At what point do you become simply annoying with your restatements, and restatements, and restatements?
Let's step forward, now. What addition to this thread do you have regarding the Jomons and the Japanese Royal family?
This is an amazingly good wonderful forum presented by Color Red. I don't know if anything like it exists anywhere else, or if it has ever been presented this way before. And what can you contribute to this wonderful thread?