Is war on Iran inevitable? - you did say rant, and it would be a bummer
don't let this rant kill the string- thread
AND don't please dont' reply!
[currently listening to music track "Geese Ja!!" from Real Bout Fatal Fury AST
& "Geese ni chuushite (Geese Howard)". It's my roommate's doing]
Yes. i am a total loser. i must admit i often don't like watching
these channels (CSpan) because it feels dirty, but BookTV often has interesting authors on talking about their books.
So Sunday morning while most people are recovering from the night before
(some going to church recovering from their week before helping the
corporations concentrate more wealth into their hands), i was watching
cspan2. i'm not about to claim i care more about something or other
than others. this some of this stuff just seems interesting. maybe
like a train wreck. so...
Today i watched on cspan2's book tv a discussion with Scott Ritter, the
former UN weapons inspector in Iraq (as well as former US marine
and republican)
who came out against the invasion of Iraq before it happened and
tried to tell
the world that Iraq did NOT have the WMDs that the administration
had been claiming.
On Sunday, October 29 at 11:30 am and at 11:30 pm Ritter and
Seymour Hersh (journalist
for the New Yorker) talked about Ritter's new book
"Target Iran: The Truth About the White House's Plans for Regime Change".
Both believe the administration is planning to attack Iran.
(recorded 10/16/06)
Ritter was not happy with what the Bushies have planned (and have
done in Iraq).
Among things that were talked about.
He pointed out that the president of Iran had no real power, it is
the Ayatollahs.
Iran's prez was irresponsible mouthing off about Israel. The Ayatollahs have
as their policy to NOT develop nuclear weapons as it is not humane and not
line with Islamic religion. According to Ritter the Ayatollahs had
sent a message through Switzerland? to the US about negotiating
about their nuclear program.
Bush needed to put Condaleeza Rice on a plain and send her to Iran
and negotiate with
the proper people.
Of course, Ritter points out, we have been conditioned
to lump all Muslims together in one basket even though, according
to Ritter the Persians(Iranians) and Israelis both in fact fear
Arab domination of the area.
Hersh agreed about with that, however disagreed that the their prez
had no power.
He had quite a substantial popular following and, although the
Iranian constitution
said the Ayatollahs had the power over the mil, police, etc... the
US constitution
says certain things too. Ritter had to concede a little and there
was a hushed cynical laugh by all on that point.
Ritter, repeated a few times that Iran does not have a policy to
make nuclear weapons, but
only energy and was stating that they agreed with the international
legal framework
on the matter. There is no evidence of otherwise. And you cannot
prove a negative.
That is how we were led into Iraq. He emphasized that we cannot
let ourselves be
duped into accepting that Iran has nuclear weapons from the get-go.
-Israel had taken on a 'faith-based' analysis rather than a
fact-based analysis.
They had this back when they didn't think Egypt would invade them
some decades ago,
but did. They went to fact-based. But, faith-based is back Ritter said.
This led Israel to place Iran, Lebanese Shiites and Hamas all into
the same group.
But was wrong. Then we the US population allow ourselves to fall into this trap of throwing everyone together too. "all those people".
Nukes.
Here is the really scary parts*******
Ritter believes Bush is going to attack Iran.
US policy is regime change for Iran.
They do not have nukes. So regime change can be the only thing.
The US under Bush has been developing so-called "usable nukes".
(They are also called "bunker busters")
Apparently the US has developed the policy to use these nukes
if troops are in massive danger.
As we know, US troops are tied up in Iraq.
If Bush sends 40,000 troops into Iran, and they get tied up,
there will be no calvary.
The US then will take the nuclear genie out of the bottle.
Once that is done, there is no stuffing it back in the bottle.
There will be retaliation on a US city.
Ritter says, for all those Americans out there who want to
go have war in Iran, they should choose their city.
Seattle? LA? NY? Miami? Choose your city. One of them
is going to get nuked if the US unleashes the genie from the bottle.
Furthemore,
How an invasion of Iran would hurt the average US citizen according to Ritter:
Iran would do how what they could. Cut off all their oil supplies to the
outside world. If you thought oil prices were high recently...
China & India sure aren't going to put their economy on hold so the US can do a war.
On top of that Venezuela might well cut off their oil supplies as well, being
that they're another people that are sick of the US being the bully and
doing things to other countries in violation of international law.
**
Also US intelligence agencies do not believe Iran is developing
a nuclear weapons program. But, unfortunately most of the
'key' political players in both parties do. For ex: Hillary Clinton.
former CIA(27 years) Ray McGovern, a member of "Veteran Intelligence
Agenst for Sanity" (or some such name), also believes the administration is
planning to attack Iran.
This site has mp3 of it available for download
http://nysoundposse.com/2006/10/event-seymour-hersh-and-scott-ritter.html
I also searched Youtube.com for "Scott Ritter" and came up with
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=scott+ritter&search=Search
which has 2 about 10min clips of the event. As well as some democracynow!
interviews.
If I had the hardware or the know-how I would record &
post this on youtube. As it will be shown again tonight on CSpan2 Sunday,
October 29 at 11:30 pm Eastern US time.
Ahhhhhhh!!!!!
The world is insane!!!! And I'm too lazy to do anything about it!!!!!!
end rant
(now The Residents are playing. how fitting)