Thank you for your English lesson.
I just intended to use the meaning #2.
I don't know how to use the English word, unprecedented, but do you know roughly 10% was signigicantly low percentage compared with other countries. And it was just a few points higher than other battle fields.
But I don't mean here it was good or bad, just I don't under/overestimate it.
It is also a fact many people feel the activist toublesome.
Unprecendented means without previous instance; never before known or experienced; unexampled or unparalleled: an unprecedented event.
There is a very good reason for using that when talking about the battle that happened here. Previous to Okinawa the Japanese forces that defended the islands that the US landed on in it's island hopping campaign across the pacific almost never surrendered and either committed suicide or died attacking the US forces in well noted suicidal attacks against heavily fortified positions.
This reference has nothing to do with other countries. This comment was made as a point of fact about the Japanese forces only.
You over exaggerated the numbers of deaths by naval gunfire here in the battle of Okinawa by staing that "millions" were killed.
I think you'll find that Westerners know more about Hiroshima and Nagasaki than incidents of Japanese brutalisation. We get taught about Hiroshima and Nagasaki from a very young age in Australia. It wasn't until after I became interested in Japan that I found out about things like the Rape of Nanking, the Rape of Manilla, Japanese scientific experiments on live humans etc.
I think that depends on the country, when I was in school I was taught about these events in history about WWII.
So if anything, the West is actually more ignorant about Japan's atrocities than the Japanese.
I dont know about this many Japanese people I know are pretty much in the dark about these incidents as well. And it does no good to further muddy the waters by attemtping to further rewrite accepted history.
I know that the Chinese and Koreans are well schooled in these atrocities, hence their current dislike for the current Japanese administrations push to rewrite many different aspects regarding WWII. That however is a different topic not related to this one.
Hero and victim's emotion are not needed in textbook
Caster it has nothing to do with emotions, other than anger at the attempt to changes what occured here.
Caster do you actually think that all the Prefectural, City and Town assemblies here in Okinawa are misguided? They all voted unanimously against the proposed changes to the textbooks, if you are as intelligent as I think you are that should open your eyes that something is wrong.
It isnt just one American here, me, telling you that something isnt right, it's all the elected representatives here in Okinawa. Plus the recently elected member of the Japanese Diet from Okinawa Itokazu Keiko is reported to have said that she will be bringing this issue up to the full assembly of the Japanese parliment in either the next few days or weeks.
it is as same as hiroshima, nagasaki...
at first ,it is true that american dropped a-bomd.
why this point is not made as big . Did they forget it?
Caster did you forget that
more people died here in Okinawa during the battle here than the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
combined.
Yet the world remembers Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but few remember Okinawa.
Did you forget this?