urecco
先輩
- 25 Oct 2004
- 93
- 3
- 18
If they wished to become a prostitute (or there was no way but to become),bossel said:That's just you, as I said.
The issue is responsibility for the whole sex slave system.
they were not slaves no matter what the working condition was.
If they forced to provide sex, they were slaves.
In that meaning,the way of living or salary was not as important as how they were recruited.
Would you say it is okay to force women provide sex if they get paid more than adequate?
I do not know how many people did she asked.bossel said:Used these 3 as examples.
If she asked just 3 people, she really biased for the victims(self-stalyed) or was naive.
If she asked hundreds or thousands people and choose the three, her dogma or foolishness was extraordinary.
This is the quality of authorized report.
People never doubt about reliable of the testimonies.
I was not mentioning about who has the responisbility.bossel said:Hmm, didn't you say these Koreans were technically Japanese? What's more, the police worked for the Japanese, hence Japanese responsibility.
I mean there must have been Korean policemen and some of them must have leaked the information about kidnapping and some campaigns should have happened.
Japan gave massive reports against it, however China,Korea and maybe Singapore blamed Japan a lot.bossel said:If you have problems with parts of these testimonies or with the report in general, contact the rapporteur or raise a formal complaint & then let us know the reaction.
As you know,Japan has been required eternal remorse and apology.
So caring the emotion of the people in East Asia,Japan stopped arguing.
Actually,it was Japan's fault, I agree.
Actually it is quite surprising that people believe that testimony which says she worked after the war as Comfort Women.bossel said:Actually, it would be quite surprising if there were no incoherences in witness accounts.