- Thread starter
- #51
At first Korea proposes an annexation to Japan.日韓併合は韓国が日本に申し込んだ条約です。
※韓国の総理大臣、李容九が部下の李人稙を密使にして日本に申し込んだ。
【噴水台】韓日合邦の魚
明治時代の初期に勝海舟(Katsu Kaishu)が「日本と中国と韓国が協力して東アジア共同体を作り、ロシアに対抗するべきだ!」という『日清提携論』を発表します
the beginning of the Meiji era , katsu announced japan-china- Korea together and make the east Asia union resist Russian.
『日清提携論』を具体化させたのが、樽井藤吉(Tarui Tokichi)の『大東合邦論』(1885年)です。
彼は日本と中国の同盟の前段階として、日本と韓国が対等で合邦するべきだ…と考えました
Fujii considered before China-Japan alliance, japan must do amalgamation with Korea equally.
we call it 「興亜論」(Kouaron
Yokichi Fukuzawa said " it is impossible that..because they are low cultural standard "
it was called Datsuaron(脱亜論)
after the sino-japan war, kouaron興亜論 lost that value.....
however the ideology of kouaron was existing in japan.
This koaron had a big influence on Korea.
李容九(一進会)was a believer of 「興亜論」
he hoped amalgamation with japan equally.
"a country that won against Russia(japan) and Korea (lowest in Asia) are going to an amalgamation equally"
they were so serious and demanded to japan.
first PM Ito opposed this.
so were PPL in japan.
Ito was angry "Why should Japan amalgamate equally with Korea?"
so Japan suppressed 一進会 Through Korean PM 李完用。
that is ....
the obstacle that Korean wanted was Ito
that is why he was killed
It is a terrible difference( japan and Korea......
they say 安重根(An Chung-gun) was also pro -japan
一進会 they weakened the amalgamation to annexation.
then Korean-G proposed annexation to Japan
P.s
However, a present Asian ideologist doesn't want to admit failure.
that is why they blam Fukuzawa's 脱亜論
South Korea is still parasitic to Japan by the use of an Asian principle.
The scenery doesn't change at all for 100 years.
Last edited: