It is thrue that the polish PM came up with this as part of his negotiation tactics. However, it backfired because all other countries in EU and much of his own population were outraged.
In Europe, we are managing very well to live in the present. However, we are constantly on the look out for populistic and nationalistic politicians who try to stir up animosity against their neighbors. One of the keys to successful integration in EU is the fact that frank aknowledgement of wrongdooing in the past, and that most politicians have refrained from trying to exploit the posibility of gaining short term popularity points by blame games. One of the preconditions for this state of affairs have been Germanys aknowledgement of ist past wrongdooings.
In the former Yugoslavia we had an example of what happens when nationalistic politicians exploits and distorts the historical facts in order to gain support. Most europeans are by now "allergic" to propoganda. Maybe this is the reason why we are concerned when some politicians in Japan - a country most of us love - try to avoid the unpleasant truth about the past - in this connection the issue of "comfort women".
Whether it backfired or not, the Polish did bring up the issue didnt they? That is my point.
Unlike Europeans, the Chinese and the Japanese had not fought against each other for more than 300 years until WWII. In fact, until the late 19th century when the Westerners came to the Far East for imperialistic invasions, the people there used to live rather peacefully, or simply ignore each other. The reason why the Europeans are so sensitive about nationalism is as simple as that, thats because of the extent to which they have killed each other, and not because they are at a moral high ground I think. This is not my original argument, but the opinion of an english friend of mine actually.
By the way your view is slightly (to say the least) biased against the Japanese. There are much, much more "populistic and nationalistic politicians who try to stir up animosity against their neighbors" in the peninsula or the continent than in Japan. It is them, eg South Korean Presidents or Chinese Communist leaders, who exploit and distort the historical facts in order to gain (political) support or deflect domestic criticism. I recommend that you check with a fresh pair of eyes which side have been doing propoganda things.
Finally, could you elaborate a bit on what you mean by saying "the unpleasant truth about the past - in this connection the issue of "comfort women?"" Abe, like his predecessors, did acknowledge their existence didnt he? He did not deny the fact that the military had been involved in setting up brothels. He just said that the military had never forced the women to serve there by kidnapping them by itself. As argued time and again, there is no evidence whatsoever proving such a claim, and the Korean women claiming they are victims have changed their words so often that they cannot be believed. If you dare to say "facts" or "truth", check and verify the claims by yourself and do not just believe what the one side is saying.
Last edited: