You don't really need to include a romaji version...あの日にあなたの言った言葉が呪いのようなぶらつくしている。"眠れない時に、誰かの夢の中で生きている"。。。
これが君の決定はバカでしたと思う理由です。なぜなら僕の愛の痛みを逃げることで 寂しさの痛みこそあなたを見つけった。
でも結局、現実を無視すればまた無意味だ。 なぜならその気持が波として来るからさ、 そしてあのなかにが、ぼくは溺れていく。
So how do I correct this? How should I say the "The words you said on that day are hanging like a curse. " verse?ような cannot modify a verb; and furthermore, a verb like ぶらつく neither can nor would need to be treated as a する verb.
That's because I was deciding between which words to use and forgot to change 無意味 to バカ in the translation.バカ and 無意味 are not the same word, so I was confused as to what the また was doing there until I looked at the English.
How would I correct this? I don't want it to sound unnatural.気持ちが波として doesn't mean 'like a wave', it means 'as a wave', but in the sense like 'As a citizen, ...' or 'As a father...'
I am not sure about which phrase you are referring to, but I would appreciate if you would post your alternation of that phrase.You can't compound the particle に and が the way that you can に and は.
At first it was all あなた , but then I decided I want to use 君 and forgot to change all of the あなたs.You use both 君 and あなた for 'you' and different points, but as part of one monologue I don't see why the speaker's mode of address would change midway.
Do you mean that the errors gave you the off sensation? Are there any suggestions you could make to make it sound more "native"?There may be other errors that I've missed, there's certainly a lot that feels off to me but it's beyond my own abilities to confidently rewrite it so I'll leave the finer points to someone else.
I am still a beginner so I used google translate for assistance in some cases.Edit: Also... I still wonder if this is the output of a translate engine? I checked and it doesn't match the output of google translate, but it still has that feeling.
Yes. The character is referring to a woman.Is "you" a woman?
ような is the attributive form. The adverbial form is ように.So how do I correct this? How should I say the "The words you said on that day are hanging like a curse. " verse?
The correct uses of よう are explained here,So how do I correct this? How should I say the "The words you said on that day are hanging like a curse. " verse?
If you want to say it's 'like a wave' then you can use the same のように that we were talking about. If you want to say it forms into a wave, then you could use なる.How would I correct this? I don't want it to sound unnatural.
I highlighted all the errors I commented on when I quoted you to make it easier to find them, but anyway it's here:I am not sure about which phrase you are referring to, but I would appreciate if you would post your alternation of that phrase.
I'm not a native or an experienced writer. I read a lot so I can recognize and understand quite a bit, but I don't write very much and when I do it's not usually very natural sounding.Do you mean that the errors gave you the off sensation? Are there any suggestions you could make to make it sound more "native"?
Yeah, don't do that. Google translate will give you bad translations. They're not always wrong in their meaning - although that happens often enough - but they never look like a normal sentence.I am still a beginner so I used google translate for assistance in some cases.
The correct uses of よう are explained here,
But this is really just a specific case of turning an adjective into an adverb. (ような is a な-adjective, after all). Turning adjectives into adverbs is here: Adverbs and Gobi - Tae Kim's Japanese grammar guide
The double-verb problem with ぶらつくしている can be fixed by just conjugating ぶらつく into -ている form.That's discussed here, Other uses of the te-form | Learn Japanese
These are all basic grammars that should also be in your textbook.
As for putting it together, I'm not sure you can sensibly say 'hanging like a curse'. You wouldn't want to use ぶらつく anyway, maybe you could use 垂れる, but maybe not.
It turns out that all three sentence example sites that I rely on for searching up natural phrasing, there's no cases of 呪いのように :
「呪いのように」に関連した英語例文の一覧 - Weblio英語例文検索
呪いのようにの英訳|英辞郎 on the WEB:アルク
「呪いのように」の例文 - Tatoeba
It doesn't seem as if the Japanese make this kind of comparison at all, so you're kind of in uncharted territory making up a new kind of sentence.
If you want to say it's 'like a wave' then you can use the same のように that we were talking about. If you want to say it forms into a wave, then you could use なる.
I highlighted all the errors I commented on when I quoted you to make it easier to find them, but anyway it's here:
そしてあのなかにが、ぼくは溺れていく
In this case you just want to remove the が, since に is the correct particle for designating where you're drowning.
The whole phrase is odd though; you say あのなか but you haven't previously referred to なか so 'あのなか' doesn't make sense, maybe you mean あの波の中 ; 溺れていく is also weird (you're drowning and then going somewhere? going somewhere while drowning?) Probably you mean 溺れている with the same -ている conjugation discussed earlier.
I have also taken your advice under consideration and would like your opinion on the new revision as well any suggestions for bettering the paragraphような is the attributive form. The adverbial form is ように.
Have you never learned how to conjugate verbs? Here's the way to form the -te form.
Japanese verb conjugation - Wikipedia
ぶらつく means "to hang/stroll about." Try to look up another verb.
あの日に is not grammatically wrong, but あの日 without に is more natural.
That's considerably better.その日、君の言った言葉がまるで呪いのように残っている。"眠れない時に、誰かの夢の中で生きている"。。。
これが君の決定はバカでしたと思う理由です。なぜなら僕の愛の痛みを逃げることで 寂しさの痛みこそあなたを見つけった。
でも結局、現実を無視すればまたバカだ。 なぜならその気持が波のように来るからさ、 そしてあの中に、僕は溺れている。
We have several native speakers on these forums, including Toritoribeさん, who already gave you some advice in this thread. If you revise your work based on the suggestions you already have, a native speaker might advise you on fine tuning or at least let you know whether it sounds reasonably natural.I appreciate all your effort. Can you suggest any sites or chats where I can speak to native Japanese speakers?
I have done some revisions and I think I've come to a nice result. If you wouldn't mind taking a last look at it, I would be great-full.We have several native speakers on these forums, including Toritoribeさん, who already gave you some advice in this thread. If you revise your work based on the suggestions you already have, a native speaker might advise you on fine tuning or at least let you know whether it sounds reasonably natural.
Other than this site, lang-8.com comes to mind, it's a site specifically for exchanging native language corrections.
This bothers me a little every time... I'm not sure you can use 生きている here. I'm not sure you can't either. It's fine grammatically and it makes enough sense, but it might be unnatural, I can't really tell.誰かの夢の中で生きている"…
You cleaned up the formality here, but you replaced 「です」 in 「バカです」 with いる, which doesn't work. いる is only used for 'is' in the sense of the 'to be' verb applied to living beings, or as an auxiliary verb for ongoing actions.これが君の決定はバカいるという理由だ。
You have 晒される in the non-past form here, which in this sentence would mean that the listener will, in future, be exposed to 孤独の痛み.僕の痛いほどの愛から逃げて、君は孤独の痛みに晒されるから。
溺れる is the non-past here also, which again would suggest a future action, while I believe you mean to state an ongoing action.そして僕はその波で溺れるから。
残っている is more likely just "to remain". I would use other words, for instance まとわりついて離れない instead.あの日、君の言った言葉が呪いのように残っている。"眠れない時に、誰かの夢の中で生きている"…
Really? I like まとわりつく for having a sinister feeling, but I didn't realize 残る was inappropriate. 勉強になりましたね。残っている is more likely just "to remain". I would use other words, for instance まとわりついて離れない instead.
I like the feeling of this.あの日の君の言葉が呪いのようにまとわりついて離れない。「眠れない時は、誰かの夢の中にいるのよ」
I replaced it with toritoribe's phrases so I don't it's gona be a problem now.This bothers me a little every time... I'm not sure you can use 生きている here. I'm not sure you can't either. It's fine grammatically and it makes enough sense, but it might be unnatural, I can't really tell.
僕も現実を無視すればまたバカをみる。 Is this better? I'm being told バカをみる is for a stupid situation which you are involved in.You cleaned up the formality here, but you replaced 「です」 in 「バカです」 with いる, which doesn't work. いる is only used for 'is' in the sense of the 'to be' verb applied to living beings, or as an auxiliary verb for ongoing actions.
It was a suggestion from a native speaker. Do you think it's a better if I remove it? I think it doesn't sound very "clear". I would only keep:You also for some reason replaced と思う with という, which doesn't mean the same thing.
So.... I just have to change it to past form like this? : 僕の痛いほどの愛から逃げて、君は孤独の痛みに晒されたから。You have 晒される in the non-past form here, which in this sentence would mean that the listener will, in future, be exposed to 孤独の痛み.
So how do I fix this? I don't want to refer to the past. I do indeed mean to state an ongoing action.溺れる is the non-past here also, which again would suggest a future action, while I believe you mean to state an ongoing action.
In the first sentence do I need to include the の before the 君? I really like the whole thing but that の just doesn't sit well in my ear.My attempt. (And this is why I asked if the speaker of the quotation is a woman.)
あの日の君の言葉が呪いのようにまとわりついて離れない。「眠れない時は、誰かの夢の中にいるのよ」
It's from the difference between an attributive 君の and modifying clause 君が言った.In the first sentence do I need to include the の before the 君? I really like the whole thing but that の just doesn't sit well in my ear.
生きている might not be so bad. It's at least far better than 住んでいる, yes.Does this mean my suspicions about 生きている were correct?
(As a completely late and after the fact aside, I feel like google's 住んでいる was even worse, since we clearly mean something other than making your home there. Practically a model example of why not to rely on google translate.)
Well, I'm not a native speaker so if they thought it sounded more natural with いう instead of 思う, I guess you could with that. Toritoribeさん is also a native speaker though, so you could also go with his suggestion.It was a suggestion from a native speaker. Do you think it's a better if I remove it? I think it doesn't sound very "clear". I would only keep:
これが君の決定はバカげている理由だ。
Yes,. precisely.So.... I just have to change it to past form like this? : 僕の痛いほどの愛から逃げて、君は孤独の痛みに晒されたから。
You've already used the ~ている form for a continuing action once in the old version when you had 生きている...So how do I fix this? I don't want to refer to the past. I do indeed mean to state an ongoing action.
Ahhhhh. I thought the version with の sounded better but I didn't know why. Thanks for the clear explanation!It's from the difference between an attributive 君の and modifying clause 君が言った.
あの日 is an adverbial phrase, so there is no problem with a verb 言った, but 君の言葉 is a noun phrase, therefore あの日 can't modify it. あの日 is interpreted to be associated with まとわりついて離れない in your sentence. That's why の after あの日 is necessary.
Ahhh, so it wasn't out of the question... but you still amended it to いる in your attempt so not the first choice at least for the tone here (or your personal style). Hmm, I'll keep that in mind. (Not that I'm likely to be writing mystical remarks like that any time soon, but you never know I guess, and I'm certainly likely to be reading them!生きている might not be so bad. It's at least far better than 住んでいる, yes.
I changed both sentences to:バカげている or バカをみる seems to sound too much colloquial to me. I would use 愚か instead, for instance.
Thank you so much for the clear explanationIt's from the difference between an attributive 君の and modifying clause 君が言った.
あの日 is an adverbial phrase, so there is no problem with a verb 言った, but 君の言葉 is a noun phrase, therefore あの日 can't modify it. あの日 is interpreted to be associated with まとわりついて離れない in your sentence. That's why の after あの日 is necessary.
So I just have to change it back to そして僕はその波で溺れている, right?You've already used the ~ている form for a continuing action once in the old version when you had 生きている...
That doesn't seem right. 愚かcan't just run into 理由 like that. な-adjectives should be followed by some form of the copula (な、だ、です、である, etc.)I changed both sentences to:
これは君の決定が愚か理由だ。
僕も現実を無視すればまた愚かだ。
I hope I didn't make any mistakes.
Exactly right.So I just have to change it back to そして僕はその波で溺れている, right?
Except for the fix to the grammar of 愚か, that seems correct enough.あの日の君の言葉が呪いのようにまとわりついて離れない。「眠れない時は、誰かの夢の中にいるのよ」
これは君の決定が愚か理由だ。僕の痛いほどの愛から逃げて、君は孤独の痛みに晒されたから。
でも結局、僕も現実を無視すればまた愚かだ。 なぜならこんな気持ちが波のように押し寄せて、そして僕はその波で溺れている。
I'm sorry about this huge delay, but I've been really busy. I have made small adjustments and followed you're advice, so here is the last version as it stands right now:That doesn't seem right. 愚かcan't just run into 理由 like that. な-adjectives should be followed by some form of the copula (な、だ、です、である, etc.)
Not な in this case, at least not without rewriting the sentence to use 愚かな決定 , but I think you can keep it quite close to the current structure and say:
「これは君の決定が愚かだった理由だ。」
Exactly right.
Except for the fix to the grammar of 愚か, that seems correct enough.
It could probably use some tuning for naturalness, it reads very flat. I don't really know how to fix that though, probably more sentence-final particles and explanatory-の particles, but I'd likely make it worse if I tried to specify where to put them (when my writing is corrected, my own sentence final particles are often questioned so, yeah.)
The から after 晒された bothers me a little, but I'm not sure it's wrong. It seems unnecessary to me (and also a little 'translationese'... in English we can say 'The reason for X is because Y' instead of 'The reason for X is Y', but I don't know that Japanese lets you do the same with から ; I don't feel like I see it used that way, but I'm not sure it can't be.)
In any case, it's quite close, certainly close enough to be understood.
Here's the revised version.
あの日の君の言葉が呪いのようにまとわりついて離れない。
「眠れない時は、誰かの夢の中にいるのよ」
でも君が決めたことはばかげていると思うんだ。
だって君は僕の愛の痛みから逃げて、孤独の痛みを知ったんだから。
でも結局、僕が現実を無視するのもまたばかげてる。
だってこの思いは波のように押し寄せて、その中で、僕は溺れているんだから。
Yes you are right about the voiceover. Do you understands correctly the implied on the first reading of the this version?. In order to ensure that the reader understands correctly on the first reading (or hearing, if this is to be a voiceover on a video, if I recall correctly)