china and japan should both make a commitment to respect the agreements that made for the history. and needless to say that the needs of both sides people are most important than the arguments about history. in my opinions i hope that Japan and china ought to combine to one nation, forget we hurt each other before, and then the best future will be waiting for us~~~
china and Japan ought to combine to one nation.
- Thread starter senator
- Start date
Ma Cherie
Your Goddess is here
- 24 Mar 2004
- 1,342
- 52
But there's been one thing on my mind lately. With all of China's rapid economic development should they even be considered a communist nation? I mean, communism goes against pretty much everything that's capitalist, so I mean what's deal here. It's a strange breed if you ask me.
- Thread starter
- #4
china and Japan have the similar culture, special history etc..maybe there are more evidences could make us believe that the two nations were the one which splited into two parts before 3000 years. so nowaday we can try to combine to one country.it's defferent with ww2. now we combine at equal partnership)
- Thread starter
- #5
china always try to get alone with japan, but their effects come to nothing after Japaness government make trouble with china and dameged the renations between the two sides. so Japaness government must have the responsibility for the bad renations between china and Japan. in the past, Japan hurt chinese more than chinese re-action. so Japan should give up the policy of see china as a enemy.and try one's best to be trusted.
Is this international Double Post day or something?
There's an edit button there somewhere you know.
As far as the idea of China and Japan combining to one nation it's probably the best idea since the UK 'combined' with Ireland.
Warning: Post may contain elements of sarcasm
There's an edit button there somewhere you know.
As far as the idea of China and Japan combining to one nation it's probably the best idea since the UK 'combined' with Ireland.
Warning: Post may contain elements of sarcasm
BrennaCeDria
Lovely Angel
- 5 May 2004
- 564
- 5
Combining to one nation won't erase the feelings one side has about another. It'll just push them closer together and start fist fights which start bar brawls which starts chaos in the streets, etc.
Exaggurated? Probably. But still probably similar to how it'd play out.
Exaggurated? Probably. But still probably similar to how it'd play out.
as far as i see the situation that looks to me like combining canada and the usa. they are allmost alike but also to different to just mix them. and in both cases both countries are proud to be "unique" and dislike the other.
interesting topic! what do the chinese/japanese people say about it?
interesting topic! what do the chinese/japanese people say about it?
- 17 Jul 2002
- 5,907
- 385
What is this preposterous idea ? History has taught us (in Europe) that two different linguistic groups, and two countries with such a distinct history (not to mention geographic barrier) cannot sucessfully be merged under the same administration.
Look at a country like Belgium. Small as it is (smaller than Kyushu ), it has 2 main linguistic regions (Dutch and Frennch speakers), and although the country has been part of the same political entity for over 500 years, share the same religion (Roman Catholic, although nowadays many people aren't religious), there are still strong tensions between the 2 communities. In fact, they are now separated in 2 states (+ Brussels as a bilingual city-state), because otherwise the country would have split up. There are still people who think the country should be divided in two, as the only things that still keep them together is the king (but anti-monarchist would be happy to see him gone), the army (but within the EU and NATO, it's quite irrelevant), and now not even the currency. Every ministry but finance and defense are independent : education, culture & tourism, economy, construction, etc.
It's already hard to imagine how China does to keep itself together. It had to give automony to Guangxi, Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia that were too culturally different. I just can't imagine Japan and China together.
Look at a country like Belgium. Small as it is (smaller than Kyushu ), it has 2 main linguistic regions (Dutch and Frennch speakers), and although the country has been part of the same political entity for over 500 years, share the same religion (Roman Catholic, although nowadays many people aren't religious), there are still strong tensions between the 2 communities. In fact, they are now separated in 2 states (+ Brussels as a bilingual city-state), because otherwise the country would have split up. There are still people who think the country should be divided in two, as the only things that still keep them together is the king (but anti-monarchist would be happy to see him gone), the army (but within the EU and NATO, it's quite irrelevant), and now not even the currency. Every ministry but finance and defense are independent : education, culture & tourism, economy, construction, etc.
It's already hard to imagine how China does to keep itself together. It had to give automony to Guangxi, Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia that were too culturally different. I just can't imagine Japan and China together.
- Thread starter
- #12
Maciamo said:
indeed, there are more examples told us that so many nations divided and others failed to combine. i mean Asia should build two economic, politic and culture groups as similar as EUROPEAN UNION.
one of these is that china and Japan combine to one under the equel partnership and similar culture.
other one is that Arab and other muslim world should combine to one country.
