What to do (Arab Spring)?

As to what to do? We must wait to see what happens in all the countries of the Middle East. At the moment the eyes of the world are watching what is going on in Libya. If Gaddafi is toppeled and got rid off for once and for all, then the focus of the peoples uprising against corrupt or opressive regimes will move elsewhere.
 
And with the passing of the latest UN resolution, 10 votes to zero, with some countries like Russia and China absaining from voting, creating a No Fly Zone over Libya, there is now more chance of British,French and US jets being in the air over Libya in the next couple of days. This could lead to a change in the conflict out there.
 
The UN gave AlGaddafi the time to kill the people in Benghazi and Israel sent Mercenaries and weapons to Gaddafi to stop the revolution and kill the people.

The only solution is Arabic-Islamic soldiers and air-force to finish Gaddafi off.
the UN is a trick.
 
The UN gave AlGaddafi the time to kill the people in Benghazi and Israel sent Mercenaries and weapons to Gaddafi to stop the revolution and kill the people.
The only solution is Arabic-Islamic soldiers and air-force to finish Gaddafi off.
the UN is a trick.

Hezam: When did you start spewing this nonsense again? I am your friend, so try not to take offense to what I'm going to say. Israel is allegedly involved whenever there is unrest in the Middle East, don't you think that is a bit absurd? What you're saying makes it sound like the future action would be to attack Israel. I fear what you're saying now is propaganda mixed with Antisemitism. I am in full support of Libya and all Arabic countries going through unrest right now. The UN is not a trick. What we need in the world is a stronger United Nations. We're coming to the point in history where we can no longer cling to our nationalities and do what's best for one group of people, but not for another. We are all equal. Be they Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Hindi, Buddhist, or whatever religion people may adhere to.

I'm really sad that you're talking like this at a time where we all need to work together to ensure no more Libyans are murdered by Gaddafi's forces, that the Libyan people can have a country they are proud of. I cannot stress enough how insane what you're saying is. What do you propose is done after Libya is liberated from Gaddafi? Do you seriously have that little regard for the Israeli people based on a bunch of ridiculous propaganda? Well, hey! People have believed that sort of trash before, didn't end well for them though. Don't you think it would be better to put all the Israeli hate on the back burner and take a better stance based on common sense and logic?
 
From p. 4 of this thread:

"The US government should not do anything,Just let the people handle their problems." - Hezam

"They said they dont need any help from the UN and NATO & USA.
But since Libya is the 9th largest oil lake they want it so badly.
You are a people and you are watching what's happening so please see how the US government and NATO deal with Arab people who seek freedom." - Hezam

Also, on pp. 1-2 of this same thread, you accused the US of propping up these dictators.

You illustrate the exact reason why I think my country should stay out of the Middle East: You people tend to blame the US for everything that's wrong in your own countries, cry for our help when disaster strikes, and blame us again if things go wrong.

These dictators are YOUR people, not OURS. So YOU deal with them -- I don't want my country meddling over there anymore.
 
These dictators are YOUR people, not OURS. So YOU deal with them -- I don't want my country meddling over there anymore.

And they'll blame us for not helping them when they were in need. We are going to be blamed for something no matter what, RolandtheHeadless. I also do not want our military intervening in Libya, no matter how justified it is. The cost of the lives lost on all sides will be immeasurable. We are going to have to though, but only with the backing of UN forces. We're not going into Libya haphazardly like we have in Afghanistan and Iraq, again, no matter how justified we were.

That's the benefit of this. France and other European countries see what needs to be done in Libya, which sadly enough is no different from what the Taliban and Saddam Hussein did in their respective countries. I don't see a difference between what is going on in Libya and what has been going on in Afghanistan and Iraq. I'd like some commentary on that from our Arabic members if possible.
 
i hope someone who reads news will answer you,someone from europe or america,a person who has been reading news for a long time.

i dont blame you,You are too far and there is a very dirty media that show a fake picture of what's happening here.

Let's just wait and see....
Wish you all the best.
 
The UN gave AlGaddafi the time to kill the people in Benghazi
For that, you can pretty much blame China and Russia, neither of which have been too happy with what's been going on in the Middle East lately, because they fear it could trigger instability in their own countries. China is particularly worried and has gone so far as to block all mention of the uprisings from its own internal media. Also both countries don't want to set a precedent in which other nations could interfere with their ability to put down domestic uprisings by force.
Many people were surprised that China and Russia even let the current U.N. resolution go through at all. Apparently both countries decided that it wasn't worth it to keep blocking the resolution, because of the threat of a widespread international backlash against them.
... and Israel sent Mercenaries and weapons to Gaddafi to stop the revolution and kill the people.
I don't know where the hell you found that accusation, but I doubt it sounds reasonable at all to anyone else here. Israeli concerns about the Egyptian uprising made a certain degree of sense, because they had been dealing with Mubarak for a long time and feared a more hostile government taking his place. But the idea of Israel sending arms and soldiers to help Gaddafi kill his own people makes no sense at all. Israel wouldn't get anything out of it, since Gaddafi has never been a great friend of theirs. It would be impossible to hide, and any Israeli government that tried it and got caught would be commiting political suicide at the very least.
You seem to think that Israel hurts Arabs just for the hell of it. That's the behavior of a cartoon villain, not a state.
Everything I've heard about the mercenaries Gaddafi has hired says that they come from other nations in north Africa (Chad, Niger, Mali, etc.), many of which are extremely poor. Money talks, what else is new?
The only solution is Arabic-Islamic soldiers and air-force to finish Gaddafi off.
the UN is a trick.
Well, the Arab League and certain Arab nations in the region seem to be backing the actions of the U.N. and the French and British military, so it looks like they disagree with you.
 
i hope someone who reads news will answer you,someone from europe or america,a person who has been reading news for a long time.
i dont blame you,You are too far and there is a very dirty media that show a fake picture of what's happening here.
Let's just wait and see....
Wish you all the best.

Hezam, as bad as the news media around the world gets, there is no chance in hell that Israel is supporting Gaddafi. Come on, bud. He hates Jewish people as much as you, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Holocaust deniers and all, Hezam. You have to see the lunacy in saying such things in regards to the situation in Libya.
 
ohh no , hazem
why you talk about zionist entity like that
yes they are raped palestinian territories but the are also human and they must do any thing is necessary for life
yes they killed palestinian old men ,old women , young kids with all kind of wopens of course with world wopens support or even money and arab silence but we hazem , we should honor the guest even if he was enemy occupier or hack our phones , whatever , and at lest they should support bad government like when they sent prohibited weapons to mubarak and like when the son of gudafi go to isael (As Yedioth Ahronoth said ) also as wikileaks said
hazem , let the zionist entity life in peace on our blood and our land
 
Last edited:
Hezam: When did you start spewing this nonsense again? I am your friend, so try not to take offense to what I'm going to say. Israel is allegedly involved whenever there is unrest in the Middle East, don't you think that is a bit absurd? What you're saying makes it sound like the future action would be to attack Israel. I fear what you're saying now is propaganda mixed with Antisemitism. I am in full support of Libya and all Arabic countries going through unrest right now. The UN is not a trick. What we need in the world is a stronger United Nations. We're coming to the point in history where we can no longer cling to our nationalities and do what's best for one group of people, but not for another. We are all equal. Be they Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Hindi, Buddhist, or whatever religion people may adhere to.

I'm really sad that you're talking like this at a time where we all need to work together to ensure no more Libyans are murdered by Gaddafi's forces, that the Libyan people can have a country they are proud of. I cannot stress enough how insane what you're saying is. What do you propose is done after Libya is liberated from Gaddafi? Do you seriously have that little regard for the Israeli people based on a bunch of ridiculous propaganda? Well, hey! People have believed that sort of trash before, didn't end well for them though. Don't you think it would be better to put all the Israeli hate on the back burner and take a better stance based on common sense and logic?
- the UN it self is not the trick,It has been used as an excuse several times ago to declare wars against many countries.
- Thor,Do you know about Sykes–Picot Agreement ?
Here Sykes–Picot Agreement
- My friend Thor,Do you know what Semitic is ?
Here Semitic

What we need in the world is a stronger United Nations. We're coming to the point in history where we can no longer cling to our nationalities and do what's best for one group of people, but not for another. We are all equal. Be they Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Hindi, Buddhist, or whatever religion people may adhere to.
i strongly agree.

RolandtheHeadless said:
You illustrate the exact reason why I think my country should stay out of the Middle East: You people tend to blame the US for everything that's wrong in your own countries, cry for our help when disaster strikes, and blame us again if things go wrong.
1- Calm down.
2- They US will not leave the middle east ( even if u insist ).
3- Don't speak like WE and YOU because you are talking about system and not people (unless you support every single thing the US government did).

RolandtheHeadless said:
These dictators are YOUR people, not OURS. So YOU deal with them -- I don't want my country meddling over there anymore.
You Are Totally Wrong.
I dont want to dig up deep in history but you forced me to.
Who do you think made all this mess in the map ?
Read carefully please :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes–Picot_Agreement
 
Everybody I should apologize. At the start of this thread I made an incorrect statement:

What to do? Blame United States.

It should have read:

What to do? Blame United States and Israel.

Again, my apologies for any misconception that may have created.
 
I fear what you're saying now is propaganda mixed with Antisemitism.
- My friend Thor,Do you know what Semitic is ?
Here Semitic
When Westerners use the words "antisemitism", "antisemite", "antisemitic", they almost never mean hatred of Semitic peoples in general, but rather hatred of Jews specifically. It's not consistent, but that's just the way the word evolved:
"While the term's etymology might suggest that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, the term was coined in the late 19th century in Germany as a more scientific-sounding term for Judenhass ("Jew-hatred"), and that has been its normal use since then."​
That's from the lead paragraphs of Wikipedia's Antisemitism article. The Etymology and usage section of that article is especially interesting; it turns out that it was German proponents of such activity who made the term widespread.
 
Everybody I should apologize. At the start of this thread I made an incorrect statement:

What to do? Blame United States.

It should have read:

What to do? Blame United States and Israel.

Again, my apologies for any misconception that may have created.
dude,Do u have any point here ? i ADVISE you to read the brittain newspaper and news websites like guardian and ruiters...etc.
If you can understand german language then go read the german newspaper,if you understand french language go read their newspapers,Spanish,Sweden,....etc
READ what the high educated people write,read their articles,read read read.

I dont blame the US or any other governments for the other's mistakes,Stop this nonsense.

The American-European reporters (honest ones) sided with Arab people after they saw what happens.
We appreciate it,And we will never forget them.

To be continue...
 
Robert Fisk: Right across the Arab world, freedom is now a prospect:
From the mildewed, corrupted dictatorships is emerging a people reborn. Not without bloodshed and violence. But now at last, the Arabs can hope to march into the bright sunlit uplands
American diplomats – US consuls in Beirut, Jerusalem, Cairo and other cities – NGOs across the region and thousands of American missionaries, pleaded with the State Department and with President Wilson to create one modern Arab state stretching from the shores of Morocco to the borders of Mesopotamia and Persia. This, they believed, would bring a large part of the Muslim world into the democratic orbit of Europe and the West.


Of course, the Sykes-Picot agreement which had already secretly carved up the Middle East, a dying Woodrow Wilson and America's lurch into isolationism put paid to any such fanciful ideas. Besides, who knows if some Arabs might have preferred the "civilisation" of Rome and, just over a decade later, of Madrid and Berlin, to the supposedly decadent democracies elsewhere in Europe? In the end, the Second World War scarred Tunisia, Libya, Egypt and Lebanon and left the rest comparatively unscathed. But this is the moment to recall the might-have-beens of history. For it is now just possible to recognise a future world in which we may be able to travel from Morocco to the Iraq-Iran border without a visa in our passports. Whether Arabs will be able to do this as speedily, of course, is another matter.

What is not in doubt is the extraordinary tempest passing through the region, the spectacular break-up of the Arab world which most of us have known for most of our lives and which most Arabs have known for most of their lives. From the mildewed, corrupted dictatorships – the cancer of the Middle East – is emerging a people reborn. Not without bloodshed, and not without much violence in front of them as well as behind them. But now at last the Arabs can hope to march into the bright sunlit uplands. Every Arab friend of mine has said exactly the same thing to me over the past weeks: "Never did I believe I would ever live to see this."


We have watched these earthquake tremors turn to cracks and the cracks into crevasses. From Tunisia to Egypt to Libya, to Yemen – perhaps only 48 hours from freedom – to Morocco and to Bahrain and, yes, even now to Syria, the young and the brave have told the world that they want freedom. And freedom, over the coming weeks and months, they will undoubtedly obtain. These are happy words to write, but they must be said with the greatest caution.

Despite all the confidence of D Cameron, Esq, I am not at all sure that Libya is going to end happily. Indeed, I'm not sure I know how it is going to end at all, although the vain and preposterous US attack on Gaddafi's compound – almost identical to the one that was staged in 1986 and took the life of Gaddafi's adopted daughter – demonstrated beyond any doubt that the intention of Obama is regime liquidation. I'm not certain, either, that Bahrain is going to be an easily created democracy, especially when Saudi Arabia – the untouchable chalice almost as sacred from criticism as Israel – is sending its military riff-raff across the border bridge.

I have noticed, of course, the whinging of the likes of Robert Skidelsky who believes that the Bush-Blair fantasy "liberation" of Iraq – which has ended up with the country effectively controlled from Tehran – led to the street uprisings today "But Western democracies' combination of freedom and order... is the product of a long history that cannot be replicated in short order," he has been saying. "Most non-Western peoples rely upon the ruler's personal virtues, not institutional limits on his power, to make their lives tolerable." I get the point. Arabs cannot be trusted with democracy – indeed they aren't ready for it like we smug Westerners are and, er, the Israelis of course. This is a bit like Israel saying – as it does say – that it is the only democracy in the Middle East, and then trying to ensure it stays that way by pleading for the Americans to keep Mubarak in power. Which is exactly what happened in January.

But Israel is a case worth examining. Usually capable of considerable forethought, its government and diplomats and overseas supporters have been hopelessly lazy and cackhanded in their response to the events thundering across the Arab world. Instead of embracing a new and democratic Egypt, they are sullenly warning of its volatility. For Israel's government, it now appears, the fall of dictators whom they have many times compared to Hitler is even worse than the dictators' preservation. We can see where the problem lies. A Mubarak would always obey orders – via Washington – from Israel. A new president will be under no such pressure. Voters in Egypt do not like the siege of Gaza. They are outraged by the theft of Arab land for Israeli colonies in the West Bank. No matter how big the bribes from Washington, no elected Egyptian president is going to be able to tolerate this state of affairs for long.

Talking of bribes, of course, the biggest of all was handed out last week – in promissory notes, to be sure – by the Saudi monarch, who is disbursing almost $150bn around his merry kingdom in the hope of being spared the wrath of his people. Who knows, it may work for a time. But as I always say, watch Saudi Arabia. And don't take your eyes off it.

The epic we can afford to forget, however, is the "war on terror". Scarcely a squeak from Osama's outfit for months. Now isn't that strange? The only thing I heard from "al Qa'ida" about Egypt was a call for the removal of Mubarak – a week after he had been deposed by people power. The latest missive from the man in the cave has urged the heroic peoples of the Arab world to remember that their revolutions have Islamic roots; which must come as a surprise to the people of Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain et al. For they all demanded freedom and liberation and democracy. And there, in a sense, is the answer to Skidelsky. Does he believe they are all lying? And if so, why?

As I said, there is much blood still to flow. And many a meddling hand to turn new democracies into time-serving dictatorships. But for once – just once – the Arabs can see the broad sunlit uplands.


Everyone Please read the article...

Source : independent
 
When Westerners use the words "antisemitism", "antisemite", "antisemitic", they almost never mean hatred of Semitic peoples in general, but rather hatred of Jews specifically. It's not consistent, but that's just the way the word evolved:
"While the term's etymology might suggest that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, the term was coined in the late 19th century in Germany as a more scientific-sounding term for Judenhass ("Jew-hatred"), and that has been its normal use since then."​
That's from the lead paragraphs of Wikipedia's Antisemitism article. The Etymology and usage section of that article is especially interesting; it turns out that it was German proponents of such activity who made the term widespread.
SO where are not count ? our blood is not worthy ?
there is nothing like anti-jewish or anti-semitic in Islamic world since 1400 years ago,it came from Europe,Jews were doctors,business men,factories owners in Islamic world,just like muslims and christians during the Caliphate.

Read the news now in Aljazeera website and see what israel did today and yesterday,they bomb people and killed 4 Innocents and 6 kids injured and 5 women too.
 
Eugene Robinson :Opinion Writer
In the Mideast, U.S. policy is still driven by realism
Source : Washingtonpost
Link Here
Anyone looking for principle and logic in the attack on Moammar Gaddafi's tyrannical regime will be disappointed. President Obama and his advisers should acknowledge the obvious truth: They are reacting to the revolutionary fervor in the Arab world with the arbitrary "realism" that is a superpower's prerogative.
Faced with an armed uprising by democracy-seeking rebels, Gaddafi threatened to turn all of Libya into a charnel house. The United States and its allies responded with overwhelming military force that is clearly intended to cripple the government and boost the revolt's chances of success.

Thus begins our third concurrent Middle East war. No one has the slightest idea how, or when, this one will end.

I have to admit that I, too, would have found it hard to stand idly by as Gaddafi drenched the streets of Benghazi in blood. But what makes it any easier to watch other despots do the same thing?

In Yemen, forces loyal to dictator Ali Abdullah Saleh have slaughtered dozens of defenseless protesters seeking democratic reform. Saleh, who has ruled the nation for 33 years, clings desperately to power despite having been abandoned by many of his political supporters and some of his generals. He has shown nothing but defiance. "Every day we hear a statement from Obama saying, 'Egypt, you can't do this, Tunisia, don't do that,'" Saleh said in a speech earlier this month. "Are you president of the United States, or president of the world?"

But there has been no U.S. military intervention. Saleh has been seen as a valuable ally in the fight against al-Qaeda, which has perhaps its most active — and potentially dangerous — base in Yemen. Attacks against the United States have been planned and staged there. Saleh, therefore, is a useful tyrant. He gets nudges, not bombs.

In Bahrain, the ruling al-Khalifa royal family has responded to peaceful demonstrations with violent repression. While the world's attention was focused on the unfolding tragedy in Japan and the looming tragedy in Libya, Bahrain's leaders brutally cleared Pearl Square of its protest encampment and even destroyed the towering monument that had become the pro-democracy movement's most powerful symbol.

But for Bahrain, too, we have polite words rather than decisive action. Why? Because the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is based there, astride the Persian Gulf shipping lanes through which 40 percent of the world's seaborne oil shipments must pass. The base gives the United States a way to counter Iran's growing power.

Also, the al-Khalifas are close allies of the Saudi royals, who are desperate to keep the protests in Bahrain from spilling over into the nearby kingdom. The Saudi rulers sent troops to help crush the Bahrain demonstrations and have banned any kind of pro-democracy agitation at home. For the House of Saud, however, the White House has barely managed to choke out a tsk-tsk.

Why is Libya so different? Basically, because the dictators of Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia — also Jordan and the Persian Gulf sheikdoms, for that matter — are friendly, cooperative and useful. Gaddafi is not.

You will recall Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's initial assessment that the regime of Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak was "stable." We knew that Mubarak was brutal and corrupt, but only when it became clear that his hold on power was slipping — and that the Egyptian military establishment would not fire on peaceful Egyptian citizens — did the administration position itself on the right side of history.

In explaining why the U.S. would join in establishing the Libyan no-fly zone, which immediately became much more, Obama tied himself in rhetorical knots. If Gaddafi were to commit atrocities against his people, Obama said, "The entire region could be destabilized, endangering many of our allies and partners." Well, duh. As he no doubt has noticed, the region is already destabilized. Friendly regimes are already being threatened, but not by Gaddafi. They are endangered by the democratic aspirations of their own people.

Gaddafi is crazy and evil; obviously, he wasn't going to listen to our advice about democracy. The world would be fortunate to be rid of him. But war in Libya is justifiable only if we are going to hold compliant dictators to the same standard we set for defiant ones. If not, then please spare us all the homilies about universal rights and freedoms. We'll know this isn't about justice, it's about power.


i swear it's not me who said that article ....
 
dude,Do u have any point here ? i ADVISE you to read the brittain newspaper and news websites like guardian and ruiters...etc.

Uh, did you even read the Guardian, because if you did, you'd know they actually support the UN Resolution and the intervention. Key Point:

If there was any doubt last week in the resolve of western powers to come to the aid of Libya's people, there is none now. Last night's military action by Nato forces, raining scores of missiles on targets across the country, signals the utmost determination to fulfil the United Nations mandate to protect civilians from violent repression by Colonel Gaddafi.

It was reasonable to hope that the Security Council vote alone might have discouraged Gaddafi. But a more bloody response was also predictable. Following the familiar patterns of a cornered tyrant, Gaddafi claimed to be implementing a truce, quibbled with UN terms and attacked the rebel stronghold at Benghazi.

An immediate, robust mobilisation of British and French forces was the necessary reply. Gaddafi's feint of a ceasefire was a ploy to cover aggression; the coalition had to put him swiftly in check.


So maybe you should take your own advice.

If you can understand german language then go read the german newspaper,if you understand french language go read their newspapers,Spanish,Sweden,....etc
READ what the high educated people write,read their articles,read read read.

Excuse me, how much do you read in a day? I do this for work; its my job to go through dozens of papers, read articles and utilize them for research. Frankly I don't see you doing that at all. You probably are on some other forums or messaging system, see some articles that plausibily support your point of view and bring them here claiming you know the truth. Then when challenged about the veracity of your claims, you turn and say we don't know the truth.

And posting one article from the Washington Post doesn't impress me. How many articles from Eugene Robinson have you read before? How many articles from the WaPo have you read period? Do you have a WaPo account?


I dont blame the US or any other governments for the other's mistakes,Stop this nonsense.
The American-European reporters (honest ones) sided with Arab people after they saw what happens.


Seriously how inconsistent can you be. I predicted a month ago that one of these revolutions will be crushed by a violent repression; You went on and on about how the Arabs will revolution will sweep these dictators out of power and that America hand needs to be cut.

Now hundreds, if not thousands are dying by the hand of Qaddaffi's forces and the Arab League, the UN and the Western Powers actually are trying to do something.

Your response? The UN and the West didn't do enough.

On the face of it there is only one consistent thing about your posting. Its that you're blatantly anti American and don't have a real perspective on this area. Everything we say is wrong so long as it doesn't support your pre-conceived notions about American and Western guilt about what is going on in the Middle East.
 
Hopefully Gaddafi's days are now numbered. And lets hope a snatch squad is sent in to Tripoli to arrest him, take him to the Hague, and see him charged with war crimes against humanity.
 
Revolution in Syria :



4th Dictator
basharelassad-1.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
over 500 killed till this moment in Syria ..
Dead bodies in fridge :
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On an unrelated note: Osama Bin Laden has been killed by US forces. The BBC article can be found here.
 
Secret Desert Force Set Up by Blackwater's Founder

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — Late one night last November, a plane carrying dozens of Colombian men touched down in this glittering seaside capital. Whisked through customs by an Emirati intelligence officer, the group boarded an unmarked bus and drove roughly 20 miles to a windswept military complex in the desert sand.
The Colombians had entered the United Arab Emirates posing as construction workers. In fact, they were soldiers for a secret American-led mercenary army being built by Erik Prince, the billionaire founder of Blackwater Worldwide, with $529 million from the oil-soaked sheikdom.

Mr. Prince, who resettled here last year after his security business faced mounting legal problems in the United States, was hired by the crown prince of Abu Dhabi to put together an 800-member battalion of foreign troops for the U.A.E., according to former employees on the project, American officials and corporate documents obtained by The New York Times.

The force is intended to conduct special operations missions inside and outside the country, defend oil pipelines and skyscrapers from terrorist attacks and put down internal revolts, the documents show. Such troops could be deployed if the Emirates faced unrest or were challenged by pro-democracy demonstrations in its crowded labor camps or democracy protests like those sweeping the Arab world this year.

The U.A.E.'s rulers, viewing their own military as inadequate, also hope that the troops could blunt the regional aggression of Iran, the country's biggest foe, the former employees said. The training camp, located on a sprawling Emirati base called Zayed Military City, is hidden behind concrete walls laced with barbed wire. Photographs show rows of identical yellow temporary buildings, used for barracks and mess halls, and a motor pool, which houses Humvees and fuel trucks. The Colombians, along with South African and other foreign troops, are trained by retired American soldiers and veterans of the German and British special operations units and the French Foreign Legion, according to the former employees and American officials.

In outsourcing critical parts of their defense to mercenaries — the soldiers of choice for medieval kings, Italian Renaissance dukes and African dictators — the Emiratis have begun a new era in the boom in wartime contracting that began after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. And by relying on a force largely created by Americans, they have introduced a volatile element in an already combustible region where the United States is widely viewed with suspicion.

The United Arab Emirates — an autocracy with the sheen of a progressive, modern state — are closely allied with the United States, and American officials indicated that the battalion program had some support in Washington.

"The gulf countries, and the U.A.E. in particular, don't have a lot of military experience. It would make sense if they looked outside their borders for help," said one Obama administration official who knew of the operation. "They might want to show that they are not to be messed with."

Still, it is not clear whether the project has the United States' official blessing. Legal experts and government officials said some of those involved with the battalion might be breaking federal laws that prohibit American citizens from training foreign troops if they did not secure a license from the State Department.

Mark C. Toner, a spokesman for the department, would not confirm whether Mr. Prince's company had obtained such a license, but he said the department was investigating to see if the training effort was in violation of American laws. Mr. Toner pointed out that Blackwater (which renamed itself Xe Services ) paid $42 million in fines last year for training foreign troops in Jordan and other countries over the years.

The U.A.E.'s ambassador to Washington, Yousef al-Otaiba, declined to comment for this article. A spokesman for Mr. Prince also did not comment.

For Mr. Prince, the foreign battalion is a bold attempt at reinvention. He is hoping to build an empire in the desert, far from the trial lawyers, Congressional investigators and Justice Department officials he is convinced worked in league to portray Blackwater as reckless. He sold the company last year, but in April, a federal appeals court reopened the case against four Blackwater guards accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in 2007.

Source :
New York Times
Secret Desert Force Set Up by Blackwater's Founder (Published 2011)


Is it not clear ?
 
Arab Spring reached Spain ...Spanish people are going to do like Arab did in Tunis and Egypt..etc

We Are with You Spanish people ...
 
Back
Top Bottom