Tsuyoiko
DON'T PANIC!
- 11 Mar 2005
- 3,136
- 165
The non-theists on the forum (especially Mycernius) are being quite easy-going trying to attack the errors present in scripture. In all honesty, however, I see no reason why this should be done.
For the moral high ground. For example, one good reason to attack creationists is for their lack of scientific knowledge. Having a good knowledge of their scriptures prevents them from making a counterattack on the same grounds.
I see no need to continue in this thread !
It's a waste to discuss religions and faith.
That's why I avoided this thread 'til now ;-)
if you wan't me to give Koran scientific miracles . i can
Go on then.
No one is denying the existence of a God. You scientifically cannot deny the existence of anything 100%.
Although it's not possible to prove it beyond any possible doubt, I think it's possible to prove the non-existence of creator gods (including those of all major religions) beyond all reasonable doubt.
Traditionally, god was used to explain phenomena such as the existence and design of the universe. Modern science can explain these without reference to god, making god epistemically unnecessary, i.e., god is not required to explain anything. Similarly, science has shown the ether and crystal spheres around the planets to be epistemically unnecessary.
The theologian will try to counter by pointing out that there are some things science can't yet explain, the origin of life being the old chestnut, and that therefore god is necessary as an explanation for these: the god of the gaps. But in order to claim this, they must demonstrate it; this brings them back to square one because it reiterates the fact that the burden of proof is on them.
While this doesn't prove the non-existence of god with absolute certainty, I think it allows us to deny the existence of god in the same way that we deny the existence of the ether - a) because there is no evidence for it; and b) because it is epistemically unnecessary.
And I realise Dawkins got there before me...
Articles
1
2
3
i'm a Moslem, i believe because i know that my religion is the only true religion
why.?
first, because iman.
second, because i read Al-Qur'an, i learn and understand the contents
third, because i read As-Sunnah, i learn and understand the contents
the fourth and so on, because all about Islam has been proven true
I read and understood Crime and Punishment but I don't worship Raskolnikov, or even Dostoevsky (not quite anyway ;-)).