Henrik Ibsen " An Enemy of the People". What can we learn from it?

[Kulern]

Just curious what you think of it?

An Enemy of the People - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[mdchachi]

That's a play mirroring real life. Brings to mind Erin Brockovich.

 

[Kulern]

That's a play mirroring real life. Brings to mind Erin Brockovich.

I will be honest. I had some racist views of Hindus. Because of the whole "Cow smearing stuff inside house thing"

So i was thinking like a majority. I didn't think further? I was thinking within context of logic, but it also gives the idea of cultural supremacy. And thats where i made an error.

In reality. I think seperation of Communism and State (Reason? Communists are Opportunists and double standarded valued people), aswell as seperation of Religion and State. Is way to go. To make Government be neutral. When it comes to religion. I view it as a spiritual experience. With Abrahamic ones it is mostly based on loyalty.

But what i think can be solution to world peace. As a living way? Are furries.

Yes i might be sounding silly. But i use the logic of "Original Cavemen". Cavemen didnt have culture, history, language or tribes... before they did. I feel furries can be a reincarnation of this. Of what true world peace looks like.

Am i right or wrong? Or what do you think?

I think getting rid of Opportunism. And also having Admins and Mods being the one to keep the peace. Is one way to do it.

 

[Kulern]

Outside my off topic rant on world peace.

Topical news

 

[mdchachi]

And also having Admins and Mods being the one to keep the peace.

That's the authoritarian way. Putin, Viktor Orban, Xi Jinping, Trump. They all want to be the "Admin" with their chosen "Mods."

 

[Kulern]

That's the authoritarian way. Putin, Viktor Orban, Xi Jinping, Trump. They all want to be the "Admin" with their chosen "Mods."

Oh i dont mean free speech should be banned. But that if one becomes, yknow super angry or extreme. Interms of rage baiting i mean. That one can try to tone it down.