Actually, you have provided no counter argument here
If you mean no counter evidence, I have seen no direct evidence and that is why I asked for it. There is as yet no direct evidence either way, which I find astounding given Japanese rigorousness on the issue. All this running around with no proof its the right direction?? No one has cobbled together some data proving the national obsession was bearing fruit? What a joke!
If you mean a counter to his "evidence",... that I provided. What he provided is NOT evidence that flu transmission rates have been affected at schools in Japan, any org in Japan, or Japan itself. Its self-evident!
Clearly what he provided was theory and controlled experiments, which cannot be accepted as proof of events in the real world.
and have not addressed the other poster at all. You simply straw-manned his argument, and you did it by disregarding facts.
Nonsense. There is no straw man. I have not disregarded anything. I agreed that in theory and controlled experiments, hand washing and masks have an effect.
But that DOES NOT, CAN NOT prove anything with regards to the question of if flu transmission rates have actually been affected.
Does anyone even believe they have been affected by casual observation even?? And I do not mean casual observation from Switzerland and Canada!
And there are even bigger questions with regard to all this that I don't see anyone asking, and I have only touched on. Like: what will this mean for natural immunity? Will this have any effect on the creation of super bugs?
Do you really believe the Japanese are even vaguely considering such questions?? Yet they are going full speed ahead!