Do you think we really landed on the moon?

[ChrisGR]

Yeah we landed on the moon but not on 1969. (i believe)

 

[Mycernius]

Yeah we landed on the moon but not on 1969. (i believe)

*sign* Neil Armstrong walkied on the moon in 1969, despite how much convoluted BS the conspiracy theorists come up with. Every claim has been debunked. Mythbusters even did a programme that debunked all the BS the moon hoaxers come out with. Their problem is that once theior pet idea has been debunked, instead of reviewing the evidence they make up more crap. Like a religion, you cannot shake them from their irrational beliefs. It takes them to do that.
Here are a few vids from shanedk on youtube dealing with these people.:
[YOUTUBE]v2qEEoQCb2I&feature=channel_page[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]ByiMQXVyY74&feature=channel_page[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]hyQV1s9uGqk&feature=channel_page[/YOUTUBE]

Look up episode three as well. They where his initial vids dealing with moon BS. Because of haoxers refusal to take in these vids and them coming up with more BS that he had to do Episode 9.

 

[Emoni]

Mycernius, thanks for posting that. Myth Busters did a GREAT job busting the "we didn't go to the moon" conspiracy (which had me guessing sometimes since there were some good arguments at times)

I don't hold it against people questioning if the moon, I'm glad they do. It would be a shame if people DIDN'T question arguments that were proposed and point out odd quirks that don't seem to fit.

 

[Elizabeth]

You don't even need to go to the Moon Rocks, the best rebuttal to harebrained allegations of a "Moon Hoax," is common sense.

Do you think we really landed on the moon?

http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1...hoax_theories/

Renowned astronomer Sir Patrick Moore fiercely refutes the hoax claims and makes it clear how he feels about those that make them. "Their ignorance of science is so complete that it's pointless to try and argue with them," says Moore. "Any idea of it being hoaxed is quite frankly insane." If it is a giant conspiracy, it is on a global scale and involves thousands of people, including Nobel Prize- winning scientists and experts from all over the world, as well as the silence of many governments that would be only too happy to prove that the United States staged the moon landings.

 

[bakaKanadajin]

I think we went to the moon.

I just don't believe we were told all of what they know about it. That is, what they found there.

I don't think they've told us all of what they know about the discoveries made by the Mars rovers either, which are still rolling around up there. NASA and the European space agency both have orbiters there as well, looking at..?

As history shows, getting the full story about an event often proves difficult until much later after everyone has either forgotten or it finally serves some purpose to let the info. out.

 

[Tsuyoiko]

Here is a link to the photos on NASA's site:

LRO Sees Apollo Landing Sites

 

[ChrisGR]

Ok first of all i am not english or american so i am not used to use fancy and science words so what i say may sound simple.

*sign* Neil Armstrong walkied on the moon in 1969, despite how much convoluted BS the conspiracy theorists come up with. Every claim has been debunked.

Are you sure?

Mythbusters even did a programme that debunked all the BS the moon hoaxers come out with.Their problem is that once theior pet idea has been debunked, instead of reviewing the evidence they make up more crap. Like a religion, you cannot shake them from their irrational beliefs. It takes them to do that.

OMG, are we talking seriously here right??? Do you realise what youre doing? i watch mythbusters every weekend... its a TV show! i watch that to crack me up, the guys are really funny and i have watched their show about moon and you are taking seriously their experimentS???? no wonder why theres a stereotype that americans are easily propaganded by the media (i dont believe that, dont name me as a racist).
What's more their footage is MONTAGED (edited) on camera they may show that for example are putting 1/6 earth gravity on the vacuum but who tells me what they were really doing? were you there? on the other hand, how do you know if this show was bribed by NASA to "prove" to common people... (thats why they were so happy when they were done, jk)
omg and YOU are the person to tell me if conspiracists make up more crap while youre sitting on the couch and accept every crap you are being shown??? do you believe in batman too?
AS for the vids on youtube, you can watch mine, its me playing tennis with my cousin.
But if you want some response, check this series if you have time...
i bet you do. youtube.com/watch?v=b_dX0nx9644

 

[FrustratedDave]

Ok first of all i am not english or american so i am not used to use fancy and science words so what i say may sound simple.
Are you sure?
OMG, are we talking seriously here right??? Do you realise what youre doing? i watch mythbusters every weekend... its a TV show! i watch that to crack me up, the guys are really funny and i have watched their show about moon and you are taking seriously their experimentS???? no wonder why theres a stereotype that americans are easily propaganded by the media (i dont believe that, dont name me as a racist).
What's more their footage is MONTAGED (edited) on camera they may show that for example are putting 1/6 earth gravity on the vacuum but who tells me what they were really doing? were you there? on the other hand, how do you know if this show was bribed by NASA to "prove" to common people... (thats why they were so happy when they were done, jk)
omg and YOU are the person to tell me if conspiracists make up more crap while youre sitting on the couch and accept every crap you are being shown??? do you believe in batman too?
AS for the vids on youtube, you can watch mine, its me playing tennis with my cousin.
But if you want some response, check this series if you have time...
i bet you do. youtube.com/watch?v=b_dX0nx9644

Let me guess, you don't do too good at science?

 

[ChrisGR]

Let me guess, you don't do too good at science?

No, i am in one of the best university sections in my country called electrical engeeniring and computer techology.
How about you? what is your job?

 

[Haruspex]

OMG, are we talking seriously here right??? Do you realise what youre doing? i watch mythbusters every weekend... its a TV show! i watch that to crack me up, the guys are really funny and i have watched their show about moon and you are taking seriously their experimentS???? no wonder why theres a stereotype that americans are easily propaganded by the media (i dont believe that, dont name me as a racist).

This here be the flag of England.

 

[Half-n-Half]

No, i am in one of the best university sections in my country called electrical engeeniring and computer techology.
How about you? what is your job?

Learning electrical engineering and computer technology, or even a more science related field like physics or chemistry, is vastly different than actually doing science. Why would NASA bribe a TV show to debunk moon landing conspiracy theories? If it's to save face, then why don't they bribe TV companies to not show footage of the Columbia shuttle exploding and say it never happened?

What's more their footage is MONTAGED (edited) on camera they may show that for example are putting 1/6 earth gravity on the vacuum but who tells me what they were really doing? were you there?

Were you there when dinosaurs were around or when Abraham Lincoln was assassinated? Direct observation is not necessary to know an event occurred, and in fact most of science depends on this.

 

[ChrisGR]

[IMG
This here be the flag of England.

Check wikipedia about the show smarty boy.

 

[ChrisGR]

Learning electrical engineering and computer technology, or even a more science related field like physics or chemistry, is vastly different than actually doing science.

Do all of the people that believe in 1969 have good relation with science??? no... but i didnt question anyone's opinion by moking his relationship with science. (except that guy who asked me cuz that was kinda provocative).[/QUOTE]

If it's to save face, then why don't they bribe TV companies to not show footage of the Columbia shuttle exploding and say it never happened?

Because that would be too suspicious, but mythbusters is like a "social" show so its more easily... hey i am not saying that they bribed it, i am not so conspiracist... i just think that
they(mythbusters) wanted to go with the wave cuz if they had shown sth not-ordinary that could cause degrations on the number of their watchers... dont you think?

 

[Haruspex]

Because that would be too suspicious, but mythbusters is like a "social" show so its more easily... hey i am not saying that they bribed it, i am not so conspiracist... i just think that
they(mythbusters) wanted to go with the wave cuz if they had shown sth not-ordinary that could cause degrations on the number of their watchers... dont you think?

They are called 'Mythbusters'. It would be pretty odd if they, instead of 'busting' them, would protect conspiracy theories.

 

[ChrisGR]

They are called 'Mythbusters'. It would be pretty odd if they, instead of 'busting' them, would protect conspiracy theories.

for a serious matter like that (and because there are some people who actually believe everything they bust) imagine the outcome...
its not about proving if the myth of robin hood with the arrows was real
its about if american people gave their govenverment billions dollars for a movie.

 

[Haruspex]

for a serious matter like that (and because there are some people who actually believe everything they bust) imagine the outcome...
its not about proving if the myth of robin hood with the arrows was real
its about if american people gave their govenverment billions dollars for a movie.

The whole landing is not a current event. The Soviet Union is now gone, and the money had been spent. People carry on with their lives. Whether or not the landing's been staged, who really gives a damn anymore? I mean, yeah, some people appear to be curious, but thats all, curiosity, not interest. If it turned out that the whole thing was staged, American taxpayers would simply shrug, complain a bit, then return to their old routine.

 

[Mycernius]

Let us see on the hoax debunked.
Clavius Moon Base - debunking the moon hoax
A collection of not only amateurs, but professionals.
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm
This one answers a lot of the regular BS hoaxers come up with.
http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2008/01/26/sky-at-night-moon-hoax-debunked-by-patrick-moore/
Sky at Night programme with Patrick Moore debunking hoax BS. I have a lot of respect for this man.

We have a thread over on RichradDawkins.net covering a similar topic. We have some nutter there also claiming we didn't go. So far his evidence has amounted to zero. I should also point out that this member also thinks that the earth is 6000 years old.

 

[ChrisGR]

Let us see on the hoax debunked.
Sky at Night programme with Patrick Moore debunking hoax BS. I have a lot of respect for this man.
We have a thread over on RichradDawkins.net covering a similar topic. We have some nutter there also claiming we didn't go. So far his evidence has amounted to zero. I should also point out that this member also thinks that the earth is 6000 years old.

Don't compare me with him... i am no idiot... i dont believe that Obama is an alien or that the earth is flat or any f***n bull crap that any stupid guy says... here in this thread we are talking about this specific matter which is not very irrational to say that it was a fake since there were "spent" billions of dollars and think about the honesty of your leaders...
Anyway, i dont know why we argue, its not my problem i didnt give any money to go to the moon, your father and mother did so its very logical that you believe its real.
If i gave money for that i propably would be thinking the same thing.
I wont talk about this in this thread at all anymore since it has no meaning... (only if someone insults me and to give a link url).
Thank you.

 

[Haruspex]

i didnt give any money to go to the moon, your father and mother did so its very logical that you believe its real.

For the second time.

=/=

 

[Mycernius]

For the second time.

=/=

Thanks Derfel.
ChrisGR, learn your flags.

I wont talk about this in this thread at all anymore since it has no meaning... (only if someone insults me and to give a link url).
Thank you.

Touchy aren't you? I didn't insult you and I gave you links about debunking the moon hoaxers. If you can't be bothered then meh.

 

[ChrisGR]

Thanks Derfel.
ChrisGR, learn your flags.

I know the flags but you are not the only one who i talk to this thread.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iBVTQrzLdiPuDuEzxgn__2bzpw0gD99FPS2G0

 

[Hezam]

ChrisGR,No one mean to insult you m8 ^^
i assure you everyone want to say his point of view without refusing the other's opinion.
i Argued with some kind people here while i dont know that they are very kind.
i stoped Mistrust and i am trying to understand people as they are ^_^

cheers ^^

 

[Elizabeth]

Don't compare me with him... i am no idiot... i dont believe that Obama is an alien or that the earth is flat or any f***n bull crap that any stupid guy says... here in this thread we are talking about this specific matter which is not very irrational to say that it was a fake since there were "spent" billions of dollars and think about the honesty of your leaders...
Anyway, i dont know why we argue, its not my problem i didnt give any money to go to the moon, your father and mother did so its very logical that you believe its real.
If i gave money for that i propably would be thinking the same thing.
I wont talk about this in this thread at all anymore since it has no meaning... (only if someone insults me and to give a link url).
Thank you.

You're not picking up on the Richard Dawkins thread ? Uh, speaking of self-righteous, arrogant, ignorant, bigoted, rude to the extreme and the mirror image of what you intend to criticize... sorry. I REALLY, REALLY despise the man. Just couldn't resist.

 

[Emoni]

Richard Dawkins? Wow, if I was compared to him I'd consider that an extreme compliment. The guy is quite brilliant, a great debater, and very gutsy. He just isn't the most smooth sort of guy.

 

[ChrisGR]

You're not picking up on the Richard Dawkins thread ? Uh, speaking of self-righteous, arrogant, ignorant, bigoted, rude to the extreme and the mirror image of what you intend to criticize... sorry. I REALLY, REALLY despise the man. Just couldn't resist.

I didnt quite get you there... could you repeat please? thx