At another press conference on February 20th, they more or less admitted that they were not willing to let the film be shown in Japan and let public discourse decide the merits of the film. They argued that showing it here was harmful. Their grievances include:
- Unauthorized Use of Hotel Security Footage: Itō, they claim, broke an agreement by including surveillance footage of her being dragged into a hotel room. This, they argue, is a violation of privacy laws, an agreement to only use the film in court, and could deter future cooperation from hotels in similar cases.
- Inclusion of Private Conversations: The film features the voice of an investigator and a taxi driver, individuals who did not explicitly consent to being part of the documentary. At least, they did not consent according to the lawyers.
- Recording Conversations with Her Own Lawyer: The most dramatic claim is that Itō recorded a conversation with Nishihiro without consent and used it in the film—a supposed violation of attorney-client trust.
These are serious accusations, but let's be blunt: they reek of a distraction, an attempt to shift the narrative away from the real issue. In their obsession with legal minutiae, these lawyers have lost the plot. Worse, they've done something far more damaging: they have publicly undermined their own former client, reinforcing the very systems of intimidation and isolation that make sexual violence cases nearly impossible to prosecute.