It was by the voice vote that the resolution was passed, therefore no written record who voted it was kept.
I am looking for media coverages about the 10, but unfortunately my poor English search skill prevents it.
MSNBC shows a bit different point of views, but no follow-up coverage about the 10.
Interesting enough, the Akahata, the paper of Japan Communist Party, also covered the news. JCP has been anti-US, but in this time they like the 10.
It seems the thank you Japan resolution also passed, but the US greatness of political balance is not the stupid resolution (the thank you one), but the absence of majority of members.
I am looking for media coverages about the 10, but unfortunately my poor English search skill prevents it.
MSNBC shows a bit different point of views, but no follow-up coverage about the 10.
The comment from someone in Niigata is interesting to read.CONGRESS TAKES UP CONTROVERSIAL MEASURE
From NBC's Mike Viqueira
Many of us view the goings on here in your US House with bemusement or even disdain. The rap is that the "people's House" occupies itself with naming post offices and passing "sense of Congress" resolutions that are sops to one special interest or another and have no real impact. Everything else -- the important stuff -- gets mired in partisanship.
MSN | Outlook, Office, Skype, Bing, Breaking News, and Latest Videos
Interesting enough, the Akahata, the paper of Japan Communist Party, also covered the news. JCP has been anti-US, but in this time they like the 10.
Sukotto, right. I know the US passed resolutions against Chinese human right issues so many times. My concern is that some nationalistic Korean posters will claim the resolution would be the only and clear-cut evidence of this issue in years later.Plus these type of resolutions are passed by many different countries
It seems the thank you Japan resolution also passed, but the US greatness of political balance is not the stupid resolution (the thank you one), but the absence of majority of members.