Why Japan make Chinese so angry

lexico · 10 May 2005

Who are you ?

miles7tp said:
Why China gets so angry?

1 China must get much ODA(Official Development Assistance) money from Japan.

Why angry ? Do you get angry when you get money ? Strange logic !

2 China plans to occupy Taiwan.

Should be happy !

3 Now, the Dalai Lama comes to Japan.

The Dalai Lama is not a PRC citizen, but a free Tibetan. Japan should not exploit him in any immoral way, if it understands morality.

Question: Do you work for the Foreign Ministry ?

lexico · 10 May 2005

miles7tp said:
I think Chinese and Korean have never read Japanese history textbook published by Fuso-sha.
They must read it before referring to education of Japan.
Chinese and Korean should make an effort to get freedom of speech and the press before blaming Japan.

Do you work for the Foreign Ministry ?

lexico · 10 May 2005

miles7tp said:
Someone fired shots at the Japanese army.

There are no evidences to indicate the Chinese soldiers fired guns first.

Truth or False, that is a question.

Why do you consider it truth?
Are you the judge of history?

On the night of July 7, 1937, what was Japan's Imperial army doing at the Lugou Bridge in Beijing, China, another country's capital ? Japanese military personnel being there is enough cause for immediate execution. How did anyone survive ?

Question: Do you work for the Foreign Ministry ?

Wang · 10 May 2005

lexico said:
The Dalai Lama is not a PRC citizen, but a free Tibetan. Japan should not exploit him in any immoral way, if it understands morality.

Japan does not exploit the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama went to Japan because he wanted to.

http://www.tibetlink.com/etib/home/detail.asp?iData=508&iCat=251&iChannel=1&nChannel=News

lexico · 10 May 2005

miles7tp said:
to Dream Time
You had better study reading.

All Chinese students get Anti-Japan education of all subjects.
They sing songs of fighting with Japanese in the musical textbook.
A story that child fights with Japanese appears in the textbook of Chinese language.
Chinese history textbook fans the flames of ill feeling against Japanese.
The number of victims is written exaggeratedly and the damage of a civil war is shifted onto Japan.
The fact that Chinese cruelly killed Japanese women and children is never written.
ﾂ催鞘?愿ｬﾅｽ窶毒陳鞘?堙??堋ｩ窶堙仰。

Korean history textbook is a fantasy.
Korean President and Korean say that our history has 5000 years. But 3000 years is a myth made in 12 century.
Korean dramatize history to keep self-esteem.
For a long time Korea had been giving many VIRGINS to China as present. Such virgins are sex slaves, aren't they?
Why do China and Korea never write this fact in their history textbook?
China never write the fact that China had destroyed, raped and plundered Korea in Chinese history textbook.
Why do not Korea make a strong protest against China?
:?
You can find many obvious wrong descriptions in Chinese and Korean history textbook.

You should try not to argue on an equal level, because your country has not come to terms with its criminal past, raising sufficient suspicions that it is returning to a militant, aggressive, expansionist country.
The Allied powers my have reinstated your country on condition that your country comply.
However, your status in Asia among Asian nations is that of contempt.
Your country is not fully reinstated as an equal.
So save your breath, 'cause a million apologies just might not be enough for anything after your outburst.

Question: Do you work for N. Korea, trying to make Japan look bad ?

kirei_na_me · 10 May 2005

lexico, you're starting to sound as frantic and out of line as this miles7tp character, as far as I'm concerned.

Calling someone an imbecile, asking if they have brain damage, and calling them "you citizen of a criminal state"(like all other coutries are free from blame) is, to me, acting just as common as the are. No?

Tim33 · 10 May 2005

Dream Time said:
it is a school book.

Misunderstanding. I mean pick up a English school history book not just a normal English history book. Still very differnt. So comparing a Japanese school history book to a normal English History book would be a wrong comparison.

English History books bend the truth and dont state all that really happened in WW2.

lexico · 10 May 2005

Wang said:
Japan does not exploit the Dalai Lama. The Dalai Lama went to Japan because he wanted to.

Exactly. I only pointed out that the Dalai Lama should have nothing to do with the recent demonstrations in China. Would he ? But miles7tp was not only making an irrelevant comment, but was also exploiting the Dalai Lama to deflect criticism on Japan. That is absolutely immoral in my opinion. What is your excuse, Wang ?

A5573A · 10 May 2005

DaLai LaMa

lexico said:
Exactly. I only pointed out that the Dalai Lama should have nothing to do with the recent demonstrations in China. Would it ? But miles7tp was not only making an irrelevant comment, but was also exploiting the Dalai Lama to deflect criticism on Japan. That is absolutely immoral in my opinion. What is your excuse, Wang ?

Believe or not, few Chinese know DaLai LaMa received the Nobel Prize.

I f I am not wrong, he is going to pass away. He attempts to commmunicate with Beijing to get a deal with Beijing so the Tibetans can "live" in a relative free land. Unfortunatedly, he has been challenged by some officials in exile government since his efforts to reach a concensus with Beijing remain unsuccessful. I don't know whether Tibet will become another East Turkistan or not, but once DaLai LaMa pass away, Beijing appointed BanChan LaMa has the authority to appoint next Dalai Lama (14th?).

A5573A · 10 May 2005

miles7tp said:
I think Chinese and Korean have never read Japanese history textbook published by Fuso-sha.
They must read it before referring to education of Japan.
Chinese and Korean should make an effort to get freedom of speech and the press before blaming Japan.

I think Koreans have freedom of speech, don't they?

lexico · 11 May 2005

A5573A said:
I think Koreans have freedom of speech, don't they?

Do I sound reserved at all ? But thanks for asking; I got to appreciate my freedom after being too comfortable.

edit: I should have qualified my statement.
1. In 1979-1983: There was censorship, and free speakers had to watch over their shoulders.

2. In 2004, I could publically criticise the president 3 km within the Presidential Residence and not get arrested or hassled.

3. As for freedom of press, there is criticism that the current government is attmpting to oppress the daily papers, but we manage to get all the news we need, perhaps too much ? ... It looks more like negotiating for more control or freedom.

A5573A · 11 May 2005

lexico said:
Do I sound reserved at all ? But thanks for asking; I got to appreciate my freedom after being too comfortable.

I think Chinese is able to come to this forum and chat---simply because this website is not monitored or blocked by our cyberpolice. In China, People enjoy limited freedom of speech online.

In 2004, I could publically criticise the president 3 km within the Presidential Residence and not get arrested or hassled.

In 2010, if you show a banner says "Free Tibet" in Tian An Men square, I don't think you can go away freely. ><''''''

That's it. It is what it is.

Why Japan make Chinese so angry

lexico

後輩

lexico

後輩

lexico

後輩

Wang

先輩

lexico

後輩

kirei_na_me

Where I'm Supposed to Be

Tim33

先輩

lexico

後輩

A5573A

先輩

A5573A

先輩

lexico

後輩

A5573A

先輩

Similar threads