Analysis of a post-election survey of 908 randomly selected voters revealed that those who had the campaign vehicle pass near their homes were about twice as likely to vote for that male candidate compared to the average among all respondents. Conversely, those whose homes were located over 1 kilometer away from where campaign vehicles passed only voted for him at a rate of about one-sixth of the average. However, there was no significant difference in the favorability rating of the candidate. Miura initially hypothesized that "increased favorability would lead to more votes" and was surprised by the finding that voting increased without a corresponding rise in favorability. "In urban elections, the situation might be different, but it has been shown that campaign vehicles have a certain effect in encouraging voting. Even though criticism is prominent, it is not likely to lead to a sudden decrease in candidates using such vehicles to make repeated chants," she commented.