No one will agree nor belive even if we show many proofs.
If you show proof confirming that you think and believe matches what you say you think and believe, this is absolutely valueless to proving the existence of a deity. If you show reproducible, testable, and verifiable evidence that can be compared with other scientific data in various fields, then you would convince almost any non-believer. However, there is absolutely no scientific evidence for the existence of such a being, and no "Some guy says there is in an old book" doesn't count.
hello derfel
We are human beings and live a short life and you are not denying the existence of account to God and ask about good and evil it is a good thing that we are looking for the right and there is no multiplicity of religions is the religion of the one true love so that we are looking for entering heaven without a death on it and I think that eternal life in heaven need Some suffering in the world and help the needy
No one is denying the existence of a God. You scientifically cannot deny the existence of anything 100%. We are saying that it is HIGHLY improbable because absolutely no evidence suggests or shows that such a thing exists.
The burden of proof for PROVING something is on your head, not ours. Please look up the teapot argument.
However, saying any of this is like talking to a wall, just like above example. That is a core aspect of religious behavior. I know that those who are religious on this thread will do one of two things when faced with theories or scientific facts of opposing arguments to their religion.
1) Totally misunderstand science, logic, and the scientific method for showing evidence and how the process works on a basic level.
2) Purposefully and completely ignore any opposing finding, no matter how much testable, and verifiable evidence supports what is stated, and then hide behind "Cause it says it in my holy book, so it must be 100% true no matter what so I HAVE to believe it."
I just recently was talking to a student, she was a hard-line Christian extremist, and joking that I was gay, then telling me how it is sinful, and that it is against nature. I quickly and easily told her that she was not only basing her beliefs on arbitrary logic, but also entirely wrong that it is against nature as it shows up in nature in many thousands of different instances. I sent her a link to Nation Geographic's article on homosexual behavior and her typed response was literally, "lalallala I'm not going to read."
That is the mindset of religion in a nutshell, and the damage, hurt, hate, and pain caused by that sort of behavior is often very apparent in anything opposed to for "religious reasons." Freedom of religion, yes. However, if you dare impose your religion on me, or other people to condemn or cause hurt, or lower someone, expect a verbal *** kicking. Impose religious insanity via physical methods, and expect a full-blown traditional *** kicking.
I totally agree. Well said. I was recently on a bus trip and one guy was talking to another how, "if religion was combined with science we would have a perfect understanding of the world and everything!" My thoughts instantly went to, "OMFG I don't want to even bother getting involved in a conversation that void of reasoning..."
