This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Economy Japan's labour force to face deficit of 11m workers in 2040

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,057
Reaction score
18,914
According to a study by the independent think-tank Recruit Works Institute published yesterday, Japan will face a shortage of more than 11 million workers by 2040, underscoring the nation's economic challenges as its population ages rapidly. The worker supply is expected to shrink by about 12% in 2040 from 2022, even as labour demand remains steady.




If you think that Japan would contemplate opening the floodgates to immigration, you're wrong:



The labour shortfall will not affect Tokyo but every other corner of Japan:



Source: Japan to Face 11 Million Worker Shortfall by 2040, Study Finds
 
The labour shortfall will not affect Tokyo but every other corner of Japan:
Yes. Now even the entire staff at Oteshima Elementary/Junior High School is out of a job (I assume but maybe they will keep the payroll going?)

Source: A Japanese girl just graduated from junior high as a class of one, as the "light goes out" on a small town.
 
Should the year in the heading of the thread be 2040 not 2024?
 
With all the advances in technology and AI, it makes me wonder why they aren't genuinely being used to solve problems like these (and in general, to make live easier for human beings) rather than mostly to enrich tech CEOs and wealthy investors while people either work harder than ever for less compensation.
 


It's the CEOs who pay for the technology and the research into AI, and they want their ROI. None of us will see the day, but I'm optimistic that humankind will not always be guided by greed.


 
Definitely technology is being used to tackle these problems too. Here are a few examples
this article talks about the gap between the promise and the reality.
 
Japan's relative decline in global economic standing and a similar ageing crisis worldwide means that boosting immigration is not the most viable solution over the long term, the study led by chief researcher Shoto Furuya said. Earlier research by the Value Management Institute said Japan needs 6.74 million foreign workers by 2040, or nearly four times the number it had in 2020, to achieve an average annual growth of about 1.24%.

This line of thought strikes me as very unusual. Furuya says "Boosting immigration is not the most viable solution over the long term", and yet all they require is 6.7 million foreign workers by 2040? And the researcher contrasts that with the 2020 level, by saying its "nearly" four times the number it had in 2020, as if it is out of the question to boost the number by 4 over the course of nearly two decades.

First of all, 2020 was an extraordinarily low year because of Covid, no? And in the second place, Japan is already not exactly encouraging immigrants, so the base number is already very low. Its not the number of immigrants one would expect of a country that desperately needs immigrants. This whole idea of "we couldn't possibly boost our currently low immigration base over the next 17 years" seems like a massive avoidance mechanism. It's like a kid who won't eat broccolli, and the mother says to eat two pieces, and the kid says "I couldn't possibly eat two pieces, because my current intake is zero pieces".
 
I learned that the trick to picky eaters is not to negotiate or demand, but to present options: "Which do you want to eat first, some broccoli or some carrots?" You don't need to be controlling, you just calmly and firmly offer options that don't include not doing the thing that needs to be done. I don't know if this works because it gives the impression of free will or because it doesn't invite the urge to rebel against orders, but I've seen it work wonders with my nephews and nieces.

In a lot of ways this makes me want to draw parallels to the climate crisis: Japan is staring down a freight train that's moving very slowly but inevitably towards it, and the consequences of failing to act will only compound as time goes on. So I guess the question would be: Do they want to call for help or try to switch tracks on their own? Because the alternative is to get crushed.

I can understand Japan's hesitancy to fling the doors open; although the country is far from homogenous that illusion persists, so they're afraid of the sudden changes that a massive demographic shift might cause. This insular attitude and xenophobia go hand-in-hand with plain ignorance, as I think most of the people who are really worried about diluting Japanese culture are poorly traveled and completely oblivious, or have extremely limited experience with foreign people and cultures. We can't necessarily ignore them or drag them kicking and screaming into reality, but they must be fully informed of the consequences of each decision made, and then hopefully the adults in charge will proceed with the necessary measures to save the country.
 
So we can give Japan a choice. More immigration or Soylent Green the old people.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…