KrazyKat
先輩
- 17 Jan 2006
- 470
- 9
So I was reading a book, and a passage seems to be written in some kind of classical Japanese, using ki on i adjectives and sonata and so on.
Anyway they seem to be using the (nai-stem)-n, ending as a positive (I think), where as normally this would definately be a negative so I'm a bit confused. Here is a bit from the passage:
そなたらもまた、闇をまもるヒョウル<闇の守り人>とならん。
ヒョウル<闇の守り人>となりて、 母なる山の命をまもらん。
also they use narite, there. Is that the classical from of natte?
Also the use of naru there between haha(?) and yama, I have an idea of what thats about but can someone give a good explanation? And of taru when it is used between nouns like that, sorry no example at hand though. I don't think these are clasical Japanese though?
ふるきカンバルの王は死に、新しきカンバルの王うまれたり!
is the tari ending just the past tense?
Thanks for your help!
Anyway they seem to be using the (nai-stem)-n, ending as a positive (I think), where as normally this would definately be a negative so I'm a bit confused. Here is a bit from the passage:
そなたらもまた、闇をまもるヒョウル<闇の守り人>とならん。
ヒョウル<闇の守り人>となりて、 母なる山の命をまもらん。
also they use narite, there. Is that the classical from of natte?
Also the use of naru there between haha(?) and yama, I have an idea of what thats about but can someone give a good explanation? And of taru when it is used between nouns like that, sorry no example at hand though. I don't think these are clasical Japanese though?
ふるきカンバルの王は死に、新しきカンバルの王うまれたり!
is the tari ending just the past tense?
Thanks for your help!