Re: 幾ら親戚 とはいえいえ: 言え
と: the quotation particle
幾ら
筆者は友人と話ができて良かったと思っていますか is supposed to be a question, isn't it?The author and his/her friend actually had a coversation. S/He thinks that's good.
What could prevent と思っていますか to be interpreted as "Am I thinking" or even "Are you thinking" or "Have you been thinking" instead of "Is s/he thinking"?Your interpretation is correct. The subject of 思っている is 筆者.
Perhaps in Japanese culture, one never says "Do I think" but "Do you think" or "Does s/he think" or "Do they think". Please comment.Yeah, if it's 筆者は友人と話ができて良かったと思いますか, the subject is the reader, i.e., "you".
This partly corroborate the above statement of mine.The subject of ~と思います is ALWAYS first person/the speaker in a declarative sentence. Similarly, in an interrogative sentence, the subject of ~と思いますか is ALWAYS second person, i.e., "you".
Is ~たいと思っています very common in Japanese conversations? I just want to ascertain whether "thinking of wanting" is one of common ways of saying one's wish or intention in Japanese language.話がしたいと思っています
I can't see any example of an affirmative statement of "You think" or "You are thinking".conclusion (the subject of 思う/思っている)
Yes, but it's more likely "even though we are relatives".Re: 幾ら親戚 とはいえ
Is it possible that the above words have the following meaning to have this fragment of sentence translated as "even though we may be relatives"?
That's a question to the readers. I wrote a fact i.e., the answer.筆者は友人と話ができて良かったと思っていますか is supposed to be a question, isn't it?
筆者は shows that the subject of 思っていますか is the writer. It can't have the meaning you listed.What could prevent と思っていますか to be interpreted as "Am I thinking" or even "Are you thinking" or "Have you been thinking" instead of "Is s/he thinking"?
私は~と思っていますか is non-sense since you are asking about your thoughts/feelings to the addressee. You must know it far more clearly than other people.Does one have to add 私は or あなたは in the beginning of the sentence to convey such idea?
Your question is unclear. 思っています can be translated "to think", not "to be thinking".Perhaps in Japanese culture, one never says "Do I think" but "Do you think" or "Does s/he think" or "Do they think". Please comment.
And "Do you think" is always 思いますか.
思います can be correct in the first sentence of the answer since it can be interpreted that the speaker exresses thier strong will
Would you mind to explain the above two statements? They seem to be contradicting each other.~と思っています also can be used when the speaker emphasizes thier opinion
I can see 思っています is a better option here but what if the speaker has the idea only for a short time, right at the time of speaking. That is he hasn't been thinking about it for long. Can 思います be used? I understand 思います is a non-past form, so it is also a present form too.it should be 思っています in the second sentence. 思います is the future tense here.
This is an honorific form, the same as お呼びになった, isn't it? But less honorific than the latter?先方がお呼びだよ。
Toritoribe said:Words or grammatical expressions are not corresponding in perfect 1-to-1 manner between different languages, as bentenmusume-san pointed out in another thread.
Again there is no example of affirmative statement for the second person using と思います or と思っています.〇日本の会社で働こうと思います。*1
×あなたは日本の会社で働こうと思います。
〇あなたは日本の会社で働こうと思いますか。*2
×彼は日本の会社で働こうと思います。
×彼は日本の会社で働こうと思いますか。
〇日本の会社で働くつもりです。
×あなたは日本の会社で働くつもりです。
〇あなたは日本の会社で働くつもりですか。*2
〇彼は日本の会社で働くつもりです。
〇彼は日本の会社で働くつもりですか。
〇日本の会社で働こうと思っています。*1
×あなたは日本の会社で働こうと思っています。
〇あなたは日本の会社で働こうと思っていますか。*2
〇彼は日本の会社で働こうと思っています。
〇彼は日本の会社で働こうと思っていますか。
This is something probably I'll never figure it out myself. It's good to be told. Thanks Toritoribe-san.The question ~(よ)うと思っていますか is a usual yes-no question, but ~(よ)うと思いますか often implies the questioner's blame (such like Do you really think so?
Are you suggesting 思っています for the third person hasn't got the connotation of emphasis on the third person's thinking?when the subject of 思っています is the speaker, 思っています emphasizes the speaker's opinion, or it shows that the speaker has been thinking it.
I remember I have only seen 思っている not 思う used for the third questions.conclusion (the subject of 思う/思っている)
I alluded to this in the other thread, but I still don't know what you're getting at here. It's weird in English, too...isn't it?Again there is no example of affirmative statement for the second person using と思います or と思っています.
It looks like either it is inappropriate for someone says what the addressee thinks or is thinking or other expressions are used for the same purpose.
I'm very sorry Toritoribe-san. I didn't know I was doing something wrong. I had supposed it would be hard for anyone jumping among threads to read the referenced material. In fact I prefer them all in one place like what you have done for me. Thanks again!necroposting
Thanks for the advice and reminder. In fact I'm doing the other way round. I can't really think adequately in Japanese yet. I'm trying to translate everything I think in English into Japanese. Then I translate it back into English. If the final English version is not the same as the initial English version, that means something has gone wrong. I'm not trying to map everything in Japanese into English. I'm trying to cover all the bases so that I can express everything in Japanese for all the thinking I'm doing in English. I might not have said "You said ..." or "You want ..." I just wish to cover all possible scenarios. When the situation arise I hope I'm ready. I've seen so many examples of ~たいと思います in sentences I was just asking if they're common. I had learnt that ~と思います is often used to soften the assertion of a statement. At the time I asked it didn't occur to me that ~たい statement is strong enough needed to be softened.You're introducing a lot of unnecessary confusion by literally translating Japanese expressions into English and then framing questions as "do Japanese people say (or not say) [English expression]?"
You could be right. I would try to correct or improve if I know where it goes wrong.you're directing your efforts in a potentially inefficient way
You're thinking about this the wrong way. It's not that "the first and third person have different forms". In fact, I'm quite certain Toritoribe-san has already pointed out how both ~たいと思う and ~たいと思っている can both be used in the first person, with different connotations (the former gives the sense that it's a thought that formed now, while the latter has the nuance that it's something the speaker has been thinking about for a while).However I understand these two don't behave like 思う where the first person and the third person have different forms.
Thanks! This is a great explanation of using 思う for asking a second person. I wish I had heard of it earlier. By the same token I suppose I could say 思っている if I ask a second person what s/he has been thinking.you're not using 思いますか because it's "the second-person form of 思う", you're using it because you're asking for their thoughts in that moment regarding a question you've just posed to them.
I referred to them as two different forms because I understand the first person can have two different forms with two different connotations as Toritoribe-san had explained. What I didn't understand at the time was why the third person can have only one form that implies s/he has been entertaining the thought for a while. Though I might still not fully understand after your explanation the way how Japanese people think I'm leaving it at this so long as I know for sure I can only use 思っている for the third person.It's not that "the first and third person have different forms".
Thank you! I shall bear that in mind.I would advise against thinking of it as "how the Japanese people think" and instead thinking of it as "how the Japanese language works."
Could Toritoribe-san advise on how one should do in order not to be regarded as necroposting?necroposting