Actually, there are two questions. One question is in the title of the the thread and is as follows:
What do you want to beileve?
The title, in and of itself, is pretty meaningless. That is so, in that any perceiving soul can and should understand that it is ground on no terms of application range, therefore is freely open to all possible terms--making it so broad in applicable range that it becomes useless as a tool for argumentation of any sorts.
The second question is as follows:
So after death what do you want it to happen?
While we may construe due to general background setting, what the question may be more specifically asking, in actual linguistic terms we again do not have any solid terms given. We can, based on such general bacground setting assume that the questioner is talking about 'what we wish would happen to our conscious awareness after we have died,' yet that is by no means explicitly determinable. The questioner could have just as easily been talking about 'what we wish would happen in human affairs on earth after we have died.' In fact,
this interpretation has the most going for it !!
In the OP, some statments are made which are quite totally disconnected from the questions that have been asked. We could, in making assumptions, draw lines between several imagined dots, but they are imagined nevertheless--there is no need whatsoever from within the communicated terms of the OP to address them as being connected in any way in the first place. For that reason, we can strike those statments out; they cancel out, so to speak.
What do I want to believe? I want to believe that by the end of August, I'll have trimmed up my waist size, put on the six-pack look (so the young girls on the beach will still turn their heads as I strut by) and tone up my muscles overall, otherwise. I also want to believe that the little lady will become, therefore, even more enthralled over wanting to believe that she'll be all over me . . . like newly found lovers of a Latin breed of the southern realms. . . yeah. . . that's what I want to believe.
PS: This is not, by any means, an effort to attack or to belittle you personally, thatsme san--I am honest about that. It is, nevertheless, a fully logical and practical example designed to encourage thought and deep consideration in posing questions for this
Serious Discussions area. If our OPs are weak, overly broad, and seemingly without clear direction, much of the following posting after such OP, will only reflect the same--I mean, that even happens when an OP is clear, defined, and well thought out, so how much more so, when an OP itself is not. Let's all be careful about that please.