A little bit of embedding to give evidence for a matter which in turn is evidence for a claim in argumentation on a point which supports a conclusion being argued for is super-dooper, A-OK !! It's fine, no problems. . ..
I reason that this thread has now gone into overkill, when compared to the immediate range of the topic created by, and in lines with the OP. Also, there is no real need to intermingle threads here which at best very questionably mesh towards the topic of the OP in argumentation.
As for the subject of background, we can say that there may well be epochs at which a hard line can be drawn, but that is only in theory. . . in the heat of the real game, there are no really hard and fast lines. We do have a thread on that matter anyway, already well supplied with the information and arguments--though it went downhill academically speaking.
Does anyone have any recent news on findings and observations from the tomb itself? I think it'd be great to bring such out here, and drop the other line of argumentation here--basically.