That's because they're in charge. They allow us to do things. We all know it.Interesting video. It's significant that it was fairly even-handed about why men and women don't want to get married, but the article title firmly focuses on women not wanting to marry.
I'lll have to think on this one for a while. (just trimmed my beard today)... The management of unwanted hair growth in what were once non-designated areas.
Anyway, what do you think about all this?
Gen Z men are more likely to believe that a wife should obey her husband than other generations, research has revealed.
Your mistake is saying "Japanese women are..." Or any statement such as "<Group of people> are..." It comes down to individuals and everybody is different at an individual level. Even if your statement is true on average (which I don't believe it is), it doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people who are not that way.Based on what I've read, Japanese women are obsessed with working 80 hour weeks, and how dare men assume that if they get married and have kids they stop working to raise them. This is the exact reason I've just decided not to move to Japan anymore, I'm still wanting to move to a different country, but I'm not trying to date nor marry a woman who wont put aside her work to marry and raise a child. So, the expectation of marriage and slashing their work hours for potential children is probably what deters them from even dating in the first place. (Remember that this is only my opinion, and I expected it to be treated as such.)
The New York Times, a leftist, woke, liberal, however you want to call it, makes a few fair points:Your mistake is saying "Japanese women are..." Or any statement such as "<Group of people> are..." It comes down to individuals and everybody is different at an individual level. Even if your statement is true on average (which I don't believe it is), it doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people who are not that way
This means over 50% are interested in marriage or dating. As for who works, doesn't work, should be mutually agreed upon by the couple. Preferably before marriage.1. Loss of Independence. In a 2023 survey, around 40% of Japanese women said that marriage or dating "puts a limit on my activities and lifestyle."
My take: How dare we expect you to slash your work hours to raise a child.
You're assuming they want to work. I think many/most would be happy not to work. But economic realities require them to work unless their partner makes enough to allow them not to.2. The "Double-Burden" Most Japanese women don't want to work full time and raise a child.
My take: How dare we expect you to slash your work hours to raise a child, expect you to do household chores, etc.
Not working, lack of independence is a big risk. If their partner ends up being a loser or, worse, abusive, then they are stuck in a miserable, even life threatening, situation.3. Financial Independence. As they progress through their jobs, most women don't need to marry for economic security.
My take: Yes, because money is far more important than marrying, and raising a child. You go, girl.
It's difficult to find a good partner.4. Lack of suitable partners. Many women don't want to be the only one doing household chores or raising the child by themselves.
My take: I actually understand this. I don't want my wife to force me to do everything on my own, so this one gets a pass, because this is the mans fault.
I really don't think most men are like that. Many men just expect their marriage to be an extension of their mothers. So for the woman in those situations it's basically like having another child in the house with no real benefit. And, sadly, many men are abusive. So while men have high expectations for a caring, loving, beautiful wife, women often get stuck with abusive, deadbeats.5. Marriage-hunting fatigue. Many women are exhausted by the high expectations and rigid gender roles.
My take: Yes, because it's so shocking that most men want to treat the wives like a queen without her having to lift a finger.
Jung is a product of his times. Though I'm not sure your conclusion follows from his theories anyhow.To explain my last take, psychologist Carl Jung explained that most men find individuality, and that without a wife, men become one-sided and rigid. according to Jung, men also over-identify as the strong, successful career persona, which leads to hidden insecurity, and that without a women for a man to love, he cannot truly be bound in the concrete world, and describes the rejection of a mans "feminine side" (which, to be very clear, he means the part of a man that craves emotional, intimacy, and love) as weak, or insecure masculinity. In conclusion, while somewhat unrealistic, many men feel as though treated their wife like a queen, recognizing her value, is the best kind of married life they can have.
It's not just "a big risk", it's economic blackmail of the worst type:Not working, lack of independence is a big risk. If their partner ends up being a loser or, worse, abusive, then they are stuck in a miserable, even life threatening, situation.
I don't see how me listing some reasons, and giving my honest opinion, implies that I do not consider myself unable to sexually attract a woman. None of that up there is me giving my two cents on why Japanese women dont want to marry, it's just me listing some reasons and giving my two cents on THOSE reasons. So saying something I said reeks of "Incle-ism" is by extension calling me an incel, when in fact you know absolutely nothing of my love life, so I kindly ask you to please do not use such words to describe me. And honestly, throwing that line in just feels like you're trying to get a cheap shot on a 16 year old (16 on Monday) kid.It's not just "a big risk", it's economic blackmail of the worst type:
The man claims "it's better" if the wife is a sahm 'for the kids's sake', which--if it works out that way--effectively ruins the wife's future and creates a huge dependency on the husband...
...who because of that misogynistic economic leverage, can then abuse the stay-at-home spouse, increasing demands in any way they want, while the sahm has been checkmated. The husband can even leave her for a newer, younger model, while the sahm is vulnerable.
Not that it needs to be placed there in order to recognize it, but in any other context, it's power harassment. Undue/unfair advantage, plain and simple--cloaked in the BS reasoning of, "do it for the children", or like the rest of the above, "it's a woman's place".
If the kids are so important, the husband should be bending over backwards trying to help, and/or take over child-rearing from the wife.
**
@mdchachi The post you replied to reeks of incel-ism. I admire the apparent patience in your response.
It is not a cheap shot. You are, as you point out yourself, a 15-year-old boy and you're commenting on the lives of grown, working women on the other side of the globe with such infuriating callousness. When I read your initial post, the one @mdchachi so diligently commented on, it made me proper angry and, if you had been older gave me 'red flag' vibes.I don't see how me listing some reasons, and giving my honest opinion, implies that I do not consider myself unable to sexually attract a woman. None of that up there is me giving my two cents on why Japanese women dont want to marry, it's just me listing some reasons and giving my two cents on THOSE reasons. So saying something I said reeks of "Incle-ism" is by extension calling me an incel, when in fact you know absolutely nothing of my love life, so I kindly ask you to please do not use such words to describe me. And honestly, throwing that line in just feels like you're trying to get a cheap shot on a 16 year old (16 on Monday) kid.
I don't know how to put into words of why my mind doesn't listen to your guys opinions, so maybe you guys can explain that to me. This is my best attempt though.It is my honest opinion that you lack the maturity, life experience, and worldliness to be able to make objective, unbiased comments on these issues. I'm not trying to be mean; I'm pointing out that your views of the world are extremely unnuanced. That when the grown men of this forum, who have this maturity, who have lived the life-experience, take the time to give perspective, to explain why your opinions are naive or uninformed, or come across as old-fashioned and, quite frankly, a little sexist, you really should listen. Because I'm a woman and I have a feeling you won't listen to me.
I'm pretty sure he was commenting on your attitude, not your love life. But you're right in that it probably wasn't the best choice of word.And yeah. That was a cheap shot. I've been in a relationship before, so calling me an incel was just plain incorrect.
While true I also want to mention in older households the wife got the paycheck and often had significant secret savings, my mother in law sure does even though she was a sahm. It helps a lot but I would still say all your dangers above are still relevant. This is called hesokuri. Hesokuri And OkozukaiIt's not just "a big risk", it's economic blackmail of the worst type:
The man claims "it's better" if the wife is a sahm 'for the kids's sake', which--if it works out that way--effectively ruins the wife's future and creates a huge dependency on the husband...
...who because of that misogynistic economic leverage, can then abuse the stay-at-home spouse, increasing demands in any way they want, while the sahm has been checkmated. The husband can even leave her for a newer, younger model, while the sahm is vulnerable.
Not that it needs to be placed there in order to recognize it, but in any other context, it's power harassment. Undue/unfair advantage, plain and simple--cloaked in the BS reasoning of, "do it for the children", or like the rest of the above, "it's a woman's place".
If the kids are so important, the husband should be bending over backwards trying to help, and/or take over child-rearing from the wife.
**
@mdchachi The post you replied to reeks of incel-ism. I admire the apparent patience in your response.