This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Transliterating Japanese

Which Transliteration system do you prefer?

  • Hepburn

    Votes: 13 86.7%
  • Nihon-shiki

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kunrei-Shiki

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • JSL

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Wapuro

    Votes: 1 6.7%
  • Other (specify below)

    Votes: 1 6.7%

  • Total voters
    15
Interesting how this topic got so far off track so quickly...
Anyway, I recently found out that most professional non-native transliterators use the Hepburn system.
 
Just a thought that occurred to me recently: Although we may not think of it, we are transliterating as we write Japanese with our computers. An overwhelming majority of people use the standard QWERTY key layout (even in Japan), and as we use IME or whatever input method, we are typing a romanized version of Japanese.

When I am actually writing Japanese words in romaji, I use Hepburn, but when I type using IME, I use whatever method allows for the least number of keystrokes.
 
When I am actually writing Japanese words in romaji, I use Hepburn, but when I type using IME, I use whatever method allows for the least number of keystrokes.

Same. There is no way to get ぢ or づ from an IME using Hepburn style (unless you type something like ちかずく and it corrects you).
 
I don't know what it's called, but I used the following things:

ち = Chi
つ = Tsu
づ = Zu
ぢ = Ji
し = Shi

... and you get the idea

-Tommy
 
Tomii, check the link to wikipedia I posted earlier in the thread.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…