Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lots of reasons.-悪魔- said:Why is it that there are some words that are not written in Kanji even though there is Kanji for it?
Such as あなた、つもり、ください、かわいい、かっこいい、etc.. I'm sure there's tons of more examples.
Hmm, true enough but I think by "not written in kanji" he means "not written in kanji right there in that sentence" instead of "not written in kanji anywhere in the known universe"mikecash said:7. They are written in kanji. He just doesn't have wide enough reading experience yet.
I vote for 2,274 kanji whose ON readings are used in common words (excluding Proper Names). Then there's about ~30 or so* that are only used in common names with KUN readings followed by a small handful of kanji that are only used in common words with irregular readings.jonny-mt said:You need to know roughly 2500 kanji to be able to function fully in Japanese.
Another reason might be that hiragana or katakana are generally perceived to be more inviting, friendlier and less intimidating than their harsher, bolder respective kanji. It's very context dependent, but in a casual setting between intimates, therefore, you tend to see ボク or キミ more than 僕、君, かわいい not 可愛い, ください not 下さい etc. although IME can be a real hassle to click the wrong selection as you're scrolling down so there are just shorthand rules of thumb -- nothing hard and fast.There are also instances where it is more appropriate to choose the hiragana over the kanji because the usage does not quite fit the kanji meaning. ~てくる is a good example.
PaulTB said:Hmm, true enough but I think by "not written in kanji" he means "not written in kanji right there in that sentence" instead of "not written in kanji anywhere in the known universe"
... I'll spare you the smiley this time (I'm worried I'll push you over the edge into assicon retaliation).
I do.Buntaro said:How many people out there know the kanji for doko, koko, kore, naze, dore, etc?
I wouldn't be too sure of that. First of all I have quite a few Japanese books published 30, 40 years ago. The kanji / kana ratio is not noticeably higher than similar text published recently. What is the case is that I notice a few kanji used that I don't recall seeing recently - these mostly appear to be where there are several different kanji possible for a word.Buntaro said:It think it is part intentional, and part unintentional, but the Japanese language is becoming simplified over the years, especially when it comes to the topic of eliminating kanji. Thank God!