Many of the so-called homonyms have in fact different accent patterns, which enables to make the difference between them in the spoken language. But the writing system doesn't mark the accent, so kanji are very useful there. Also, the writen language uses much more complex words than the spoken language, but their meaning can sometimes easily guessed from the kanji.ajm said:Several posters have brought up the well-heard argument that the sheer number of homonyms alone makes kanji irreplaceable.
If that is true, how do people manage to communicate in every-day, spoken Japanese, where there are no kanji?
I agree for 1, maybe 2. 3 is unnecessary if we mark word accent by a diacritic (ex: ' ). 4 is also unnecessary: we can just put a space between the word and the particle-Rudel- said:Let's say they did abolished the Kanji (Except for En, and the numbers)...What would the new rules be
1. Spaced out words
2. All foreign words are Katakana
3. Words that have the same sounds/spelling, will be distinguished by a new tick mark. (*) as apposed to the traditional (" ツ≫?ケ)
4. Particals will be identified by using the apostrophe between the word and partical.
-Rudel- said:Let's say they did abolished the Kanji (Except for En, and the numbers)...What would the new rules be?
1. Spaced out words
2. All foriegn words are Katakana
3. Words that have the same sounds/spelling, will be distinguished by a new tick mark. (*) as apposed to the traditional (" ツ≫?ケ)
4. Particals will be identified by using the apostrophe between the word and partical.
Example: 窶堋ー窶堙ア窶堋ォツ 窶堙??堋キ'窶堋ゥツ。 窶堙ュ窶堋ス窶堋オ'窶堙債 ニ但ニ陳?椎?ニ谷'窶堋ゥ窶堙ァツ 窶堋ォ窶堙懌?堋キツ。ツ 窶堙坂?堋カ窶堙溪?堙懌?堋オ窶堋スツ。ツ 窶堙??堋シツ 窶堙ヲ窶堙ォ窶堋オ窶堋ュツ。
Confusing indeed. May take several years to get Japan to switch over and have all students that are currently in school learn the new way.
That's what Noah Webster did in America, and the reason why Americans spell some words differently to British English. Actually the silent letters in English were pronouced in the past, so 'Knife' would be said as it is spelt as goes for 'Know' and 'Knight'. Over the years the letters have lost their sound to become silent. That is why English now can be so difficult to spell. But this is found in other languages, even in Japanese. In some cases the 'u' or 'i' sound is lost ie: Desu, hajimemashite (Correct me if I'm wrong)Ewok85 said:And for who would these changes have a benefit?
Lazy students of Japanese who think its "too hard/complex/absurd"
Theres some things I'd like to change about english, such as a standard English (English English). None of this American/Australia english etc. Abolish silent letters (which would just cause the same hononym problem...). Proper teaching of how grammar works.
Silverbackman said:The main reason why I am a little against kanji is not only because of the difficulty, it somewhat shows that all Japan is a copycat from China. I mean, if you want to learn kanji why not study Chinese, which is more China unique than Japan unique. Japan's evolution of Hiragana and Katakana are Japan, kanji isn't necessarily Japan.
Good, healthy line of reason you have there and it's generally assumed true. Nevertheless, the middle part would make more sense if it was the other way around. Sharing the written langauge was the cause of these areas becoming related, at least during the historical period. I could be proven wrong, but that seems to make more sense right now.P_RayDub said:I kinda figured that kanji was originaly invented by China, but so what? Most of Asia copy from eachother. China, Japan, Korea, all of them are related to one another so it's only natural to for each of those countries to borrow ideas. Why ruin a good thing?
RinoaRita said:On the other hand, I was trying to read natsume soseki's sanshiro in japanese and I couldn't get through the first page because of all the kanji. I read the translated version in one night. I'd like to think of my self as fleunt conversationally. However, reading kanji is the biggest obstacle to me reading japanese literture. Maybe more books should have furigana?
All recent publications of classic works have footnotes to explain conventions and readings that can no longer be found in modern Japanese. Natsume Soseki is actually relatively easy for a native Japanese with some education and is read by junior high school and high school students in Japan. Making it easier than what it is now is unthinkable for me.Glenn said:Note that Soseki wrote during the turn of the twentieth century, before the Japanese orthography was standardized. There were lots of kana conventions that would cause you headaches when trying to read his original prints, too. A lot of the kanji that he used are nowadays obsolete and/or simplified.
That sounds like what I went through reading Shakespeare's plays in high school and college. Of course, Soseki is much closer to contemporary.
A Gentle Knight was *****ing on the plaine,
Y cladd in mightie armes and siluer shielde,
Wherein old dints of deepe wounds did remaine,
The cruell markes of many' a bloudy fielde;
Yet armes till that time did he neuer wield:
His angry steede did chide his foming bitt,
As much disdayning to the curbe to yield:
Full iolly knight he seemd, and faire did sitt,
As one for knightly giusts and fierce encounters fitt.
But on his brest a bloudie Crosse he bore,
The deare remembrance of his dying Lord,
For whose sweete sake that glorious badge he wore,
And dead as liuing euer him ador'd:
Vpon his shield the like was also scor'd,
For soueraine hope, which in his helpe he had:
Right faithfull true he was in deede and word,
But of his cheere did seeme too solemne sad;
Yet nothing did he dread, but euer was ydrad.
Got in the mile-high club did he?Mal said:A Gentle Knight was *****ing on the plaine
Got in the mile-high club did he?
Well you know what they say,Mal said:Well played. Golf clap.
Silverbackman said:The main reason why I am a little against kanji is not only because of the difficulty, it somewhat shows that all Japan is a copycat from China. I mean, if you want to learn kanji why not study Chinese, which is more China unique than Japan unique. Japan's evolution of Hiragana and Katakana are Japan, kanji isn't necessarily Japan.
Shooter452 said:Several people I knew on Okinawa related to me that they did not know more than half of the characters in kanji, while they regularly used and were quite comfortable with the phonetic characters (Hiragana/Katakana?). But they said that kanji was a part of the cultural soul of Japan and none were eager to discard it. While these individuals hardly constituted a random sampling of the Japanese people, I got the impression that this was a widespread feeling.
[/I]