is incorrect. The society who own the page linked above was founded in 1920 by native speakers (although the main people involved worked or studied abroad; 山下芳太郎 was a diplomat, so that probably had some influence on his views).Super-Elite Europeans are attempting to dumb-down Japanese society.
But plant operator TEPCO, which has been lambasted internationally for what critics say is its hapless handling of the catastrophe at Fukushima, used the wrong Chinese character for Abe's surname.
Does Japanese Really Need Kanji? | Japan Forum
In the above thread I made a point about how kanji is ridiculous for names, because just by seeing the kanji, you don't know how to actually read it half the time. People's names get written wrong and read wrong, and its a constant source of unnecessary frustration and embarrassment. I so wish I could post this there, but:
TEPCO apologizes for getting Abe's name wrong during his visit to Fukushima ? Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion
Not just the idiots at TEPCO, really anyone could have made the mistake, and despite all the hands the suit must have passed though, no one would have noticed. This is not a simple typo. It can't be. If Obama's name was misprinted Oboma, I bet someone would have noticed real fast, and it would be a genuine typo. You don't choose an entirely wrong kanji by accident and it fools a bunch of people. I guarantee the wrong kanji was chosen simply because of the complications created by trying to fit the square peg of Chinese Characters into the round hole that is the Japanese language. And that is why nobody noticed until Abe himself pointed it out.
Your name example is pointless, every language has counterintuitive pronunciations and it does not stop at English. Going off your logic I suppose we should get rid of the Roman alphabet b/c names cause confusion in some cases. I don't know how many times I have heard someone miss pronounce someones's name and have to be corrected the name holder
The fact is that if you understand Kanji you are more than likely to get the reading correct and I don't believe that incorrect readings of a name in Japanese happens more often than in English.
Again your argument pointless.
I know it is difficult for you, but try not to confuse yourself with anyone else.I think you meant to say that arguing with you is pointless?
It usually only hurts when I read your garbage comments.No, you don't throw out a whole alphabet because of spelling variations. You reform the alphabet and the spellings (reform dude. I don't what part of that word makes your brain hurt).
I didn't say any of that, you just did. Again ,you either purposefully make up things to suit yourself or you really are low end of the IQ scale. But, just to entertain your feeble brain, there are more than just Sean and Shawn in regards to counterintuitive pronunciations and your single example to try and validate your name example in Japanese holds absolute no merit what so ever. Further more, Sean and Shawn are great examples of counterintuitive pronunciations that have become common place and most of society would be able to tell the difference, on the other hand Japanese population will have problem reading pronouncing the names 隆 and 孝 correctly.For example, what purpose do the letters C, X and Q serve? None as their pronunciations are all available in S,K, Z and W and combos of them.
You say you see no difference between Sean and Shawn and 隆 and 孝? I believe you really can't. Yes, I believe you!
your single example to try and validate your name example in Japanese holds absolute no merit what so ever.
on the other hand Japanese population will have problem reading pronouncing the names 隆 and 孝 correctly.
Better start a thread about the how the English language needs a huge overhaul Zorro.
But, you are suggesting throwing away all Japanese Kanji characters. So throwing away all the Latin characters in favor of something more practical is certainly needed in the English language and this would also be considered reform,
This issue was raised up I think sometime before in Japan but it never got passed.
Do you think they should keep kanji? Kanji is makes it more difficult to learn Japanese, and hiragana and katagana could be used to write any word. Since Kanji is basically a copy of Chinese and hiragana and katagana are more Japanese unique, I don't see why kanji should be kept.
What do you think?
If they did that, they'd simply write those same words in Hiragana which wouldn't solve the problem.However, seriously I feel that they should abolish Katakana. Katakana is a severe roadblock to the Japanese to be fluent in English. Actually it's a joke to teach English to the school kids writing it in Katakana
However, seriously I feel that they should abolish Katakana. Katakana is a severe roadblock to the Japanese to be fluent in English. Actually it's a joke to teach English to the school kids writing it in Katakana
mdchachi said:If they did that, they'd simply write those same words in Hiragana which wouldn't solve the problem.
The "problem" I was referring to was what EmbJapan mentioned -- that of teaching/learning English in Japan.More to the point, there's no "problem" at all. Loanwords in a language do not exist to help native speakers of that language become fluent in the foreign language from which they were derived -- and honestly it's kind of a bit ethnocentric to suggest this.
Should the English language adopt katakana/hiragana/katakana so that native English speakers become stop reading "karaoke" as "carry-okee", "karate" as "kuh-RAH-tee", etc., and therefore become better at pronouncing Japanese? What about all the countless words borrowed from other languages? Going back to Japanese, how do you propose that the Japanese language represent the countless words that are derived from languages other than English (アルバイト) or coined in Japanese to begin with (パソコン, コンセント, etc.)
If you want to criticize Japanese people's English ability, fine, I suppose -- though again, I would argue it's a lot better than, say, 99% of American/British native English speakers in literally any foreign language -- but the root cause for this would be in the school system and the way in which English is taught (and simply the fact that English and Japanese are two completely unrelated languages meaning that they are hard for speakers of the other language to learn), not simply the fact that loanwords exist and are pronounced using the sounds of the Japanese language.
Because it's the lingua franca of international business. In my current company it's shocking the lack of English capability of some people. Not just vocally but even written. Of course to be fair, these people whose career was spent on the domestic market probably never expected to be thrust into an international company like they were after they purchased an American company. Lucky for them they can get by somewhat with Deepl. Plus the help of others like myself and some of the Japanese who are more bilingual. The good news is this situation helps keep me gainfully employed.Why is it incumbent upon Japanese people to master English when the vast majority of non-Japanese-speakers will never come close to anything approaching reasonable proficiency in Japanese?