- 22 Feb 2008
- 18,266
- 4,926
No. That's the passive form; "the way the toy is played/how the toy is played".Thanks for all your help!!!
グッド・トイの選考では、まず推薦されたおもちゃをいろいろな年代の人に実際に遊んでみてもらい、専門家が遊ばれ方を見て評価をします。
Is 遊ばれ方 the same as 遊び方 but more polite?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. That's the passive form; "the way the toy is played/how the toy is played".Thanks for all your help!!!
グッド・トイの選考では、まず推薦されたおもちゃをいろいろな年代の人に実際に遊んでみてもらい、専門家が遊ばれ方を見て評価をします。
Is 遊ばれ方 the same as 遊び方 but more polite?
How ただ is "Nevertheless" depends on what it is being connected with. But the rest seems like a basically fine translation.Thanks!!!
Also, I'm having a difficult time understanding ながらも.
ただ、ここ数年、社員を大切にしながらも営業を上げている企業が増えています。
Could the above sentence be translated as "Nevertheless, in the past several years, there have been more and more companies raising sales while valuing their employees."
I can't explain it well, but you don't see ながらも very often with a verb stem in the sense of "while also doing" or to describe the lesser of two actions taking place concurrently. Adding the も seems to nearly always indicate the "even though" or "in spite of" connotation. ☝Basically, I just don't get the point of ながらも in the sentence... my thought process goes, "wouldn't ながら be fine?"
Thanks in advance!!
As Elizabeth-san wrote, this ながらも connotes an adversative conjunction or a sense of "nevertheless/despite".Thanks! I'll type up the surrounding sentences for better context:
最近、企業の不祥事が相次いでいますが、問題を起こす企業には共通点があると思います。それは「社員を大切にしていない」ということです。「社員を大切にする」とは、給料が高いとか、福利厚生を充実させるということではなく、仕事を通じて成長できるとか、仲間と協力して物事を成し遂げる達成感が感じられるといったことです。問題のある企業はこれらをないがしろにし、利益だけしか見ていないのです。
ただ、ここ数年、社員を大切にしながらも業績を上げている企業が増えています。「社員を大切にするなどと甘いことを言っていたら、経営は成り立たない」といわれる中で、なぜそれが可能なのか。その条件を探ることが、本書の執筆理由です。
Basically, I just don't get the point of ながらも in the sentence... my thought process goes, "wouldn't ながら be fine?"
Thanks in advance!!
Thanks! I'll type up the surrounding sentences for better context:
最近、企業の不祥事が相次いでいますが、問題を起こす企業には共通点があると思います。それは「社員を大切にしていない」ということです。「社員を大切にする」とは、給料が高いとか、福利厚生を充実させるということではなく、仕事を通じて成長できるとか、仲間と協力して物事を成し遂げる達成感が感じられるといったことです。問題のある企業はこれらをないがしろにし、利益だけしか見ていないのです。
ただ、ここ数年、社員を大切にしながらも業績を上げている企業が増えています。「社員を大切にするなどと甘いことを言っていたら、経営は成り立たない」といわれる中で、なぜそれが可能なのか。その条件を探ることが、本書の執筆理由です。
Basically, I just don't get the point of ながらも in the sentence... my thought process goes, "wouldn't ながら be fine?"
Thanks in advance!!
「ながら」の検索結果 - Yahoo!辞書ながら 【▼乍ら】
(接助)
[2] 体言・動詞、および動詞型活用の助動詞の連用形、形容詞の連体形(古くは形容詞語幹)などに付いて、上の事柄と下の事柄とが矛盾する関係にある意を表す。…にもかかわらず。…ではあるが。…ているのに。
悪口を言われ―、少しも怒らない
若い―気がきいている
ながら【×乍ら】
[接助]
2 名詞、動詞型活用語の連用形、形容詞型活用語の連体形などに付く。内容の矛盾する二つの事柄をつなぐ意を表す。…にもかかわらず。…ではあるが。「学生―読書もしない」「知ってい―答えない」
I`m having a bit of trouble understanding this sentence. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
SN比向上のためのロックイン動作は、DSPが発生する正弦波をCMA外筒電圧に重畳させ、電子増倍管出力をそのままDSPが取込んで行ないます
Where exactly do you have a problem in understanding this whole sentence?
Could you please explain what you've got so far and which part is troublesome?
Where exactly do you have a problem in understanding this whole sentence?
Could you please explain what you've got so far and which part is troublesome?
Well, I think I get the first part which is talking about the lock-in operation improving the S/N ratio, after that I get a little lost. I guess the next bit is about the DSP generated sine waves being superimposed onto the CMA outer tube voltage. Is that the right way around? And then the next bit is talking about the electron multiplier output, which is captured by the DSP, I think? But I don't really get how the そのまま fits into it. Is this all along the right lines?
Oh, yes. Thanks for the reminder. It may be formal-sounding, but there are cases a pure unmodified noun can be followed by ながら. Isn't も optional, though, for like 学生ながら etc ?In addition, this might be confusing, but just ながら without も can mean "nevertheless/despite".
This ながら doesn't always express "doing an action", as you can see in the examples above; 若いながら, 学生ながら.
Yes, ながらも can be used for both cases.Oh, yes. Thanks for the reminder. It may be formal-sounding, but there are cases a pure unmodified noun can be followed by ながら. Isn't も optional, though, for like 学生ながら etc ?
:?
(literally) We do dissemination and education of the knowledge and skill for efficient operation.new12;672244 said:Hi guys, I hope someone can help me to translate this sentence:
効率の良い運用の為の知識及び技術の普及啓蒙を行います
I kinda get that its talking about some kind of knowledgeable and skilled instruction leading to efficient operation. But I don't get where the 普及 comes into it. Also is it saying that this instruction will be done, or should be done, or what?
Hello, I need help translating this phrase "楽に追い払える". I understand the verb but I don't know how should I translate raku. This the complete sentence:
竜殺しの剣あれば 楽に追い払えるかも しれないけれど
そのまま means "as it is" i.e. without any modification/change.
SN比向上のためのロックイン動作は、
DSPが発生する正弦波を
CMA外筒電圧に重畳させ、
電子増倍管出力 をそのままDSPが取込んで
行ないます
Core of this sentence is
ロックイン動作は、
行ないます
SN比向上のための modifies ロックイン動作
DSPが発生する正弦波をCMA外筒電圧に重畳させ、
This clause modifies 行います
it explains how "lock-in" is done.
I have no knowledge of these technical terms so I just approach from the sentence structure but I think you got it right until ~させ.
SN比向上のためのロックイン動作は、
(as for)lock-in operation improving the S/N ratio/lock-in operation to improve the S/N ratio
DSPが発生する正弦波を CMA外筒電圧に重畳させ、
superimiposing the sine waves generated by the DSP onto the CMA outer tube voltage
I do not know what is 電子増倍管出力 in English so I put it as [A]
電子倍増管出力をそのままDSPが取込んで行ないます
DSP operates (it) taking in A without modification.
Hope the above helps you to understand the sentence.
オージェ電子分光(AES)は、固体表面の研究においては、ベーシックアイテムというべき地位にありますが、多数の分析ヘッドや処理ヘッドを組み込んだ超高真空実験装置内にあっては、できるだけ省スペースで利用したいものです。
The main problem I have is with the 省スペースで利用したいものです. I really don't understand it, or how it links in with the rest of the sentence.
I think I understand that the first part is talking about when investigating basic elements of the AES that they have a fixed position. And then it is talking about a ultra high vacuum experimental device (which incorporates a number of analysis heads and processing heads. But its that last part I don't really get. And help would be greatly appreciated.