I'm with Tosh on this one: "stay away from romaji".
When I was starting out, I always thought that the urgings of more experienced learners to only read Japanese in kana or kanji were a little over the top (even verging on being pretentious). Still, having studied for a couple of years, I'm convinced it's the only way.
For travellers who need a few phrases for their trip to Japan, the familiar alphabet is the only useful option. For anyone intending to study above that level, using romaji can only be counterproductive in the long run.
The writing system of Japanese is not only intrinsically linked to the language itself. Still, it is also perhaps the most fascinating things about the language and, therefore, something that learners should be encouraged to get into.
Surely a quality site like Japan Forum should avoid using romaji, which seems to be used mainly only by the worst textbooks that are out there. I don't mean that it should exclude absolute beginners, but rather that it should be showing newcomers to the language how surprisingly easy and rewarding learning kana, kanji can be.
I suppose the written language was the main thing that got me into learning Japanese in the first place, which makes me a little biassed, and maybe I've misunderstood the main point of this thread and responded inappropriately, but, hey, I'm still right. Probably.