Emoni
先輩
- 20 Sep 2003
- 1,779
- 67
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nice gaijin said:I saw this and was just shocked that such a thing would get by JR's design office
Dutch Baka said:shocked because of they have the train in the building? or the bad design that the train is in the building, because there was no space above it. where else should they have put the train? in the woman? I understand the add, but they should have chosen a different design *company lol*
a building with two towers, to say the least.Emoni said:Where should they have put the train you ask? Well... they could have put it on a train track. Why would NiceGaijin be "shocked" by the bad design, and not that it is about to ram into the Shinjuku Government building?
JR Guy #1: "Dude! Where should we put the train?"
JR Guy #2: "Um... dunno."
JR Guy #1: "I KNOW!!! Lets put it in the sky! That would cool!"
JR Guy #2: "Wow! Ya! And we could have it screaming towards a government building!"
JR Guy #1: "Wow... that is even better! We are SOOO getting to go home before 11:30pm tonight!"
Anyway, putting the train on the ground might have been a slightly better idea...
I don't think it's particularly insensitive either. The whole point is to make taking the Tohoku shinkansen into a spectacular experience, similar to what you would get with a plane with a distinctive design backdrop over Tokyo for a lasting impression. The buildings look half-animated, anyway, and it is clearly headed in front not into the side.Dutch Baka said:I don't understand the fuz about it, but yeah.
Emoni said:Of course they didn't make it thinking of 9/11. I never said anything of the sort, so please do not imply that I did. No it doesn't ram the building, but it is flying directly towards the building.
You haven't been to Japan in that region probably, but the building is the Shinjuku government building in Shinjuku Tokyo. It is one of the most famous buildings in Tokyo.
I burst out laughing when I read this.Emoni said:JR Guy #1: "Wow... that is even better! We are SOOO getting to go home before 11:30pm tonight!"
Yes, it does evoke a scene of 9/11. It has some strong similiarities, very strong. Keep in mind this is right next to an ad campaign to bring more Americans to Japan. Just horrible ad planning if you ask me.JimmySeal said:I agree with Nice Gaijin's last comment. It's obviously not headed for the buildings but it does evoke such an image.
Mike Cash said:I drive by the thing about 12 times a week. The train is "flying" parallel to the building and couldn't possibly hit it. It would have to be coming in at an angle in order to hit the building.
As far as I know, just one. But Paris Hilton does a lot of weird things. What's your point?pipokun said:How many American women eat humbergers while they wash their cars...
same here! i'm no american, but the first thing i thought of when seeing this ad was 9/11yukio_michael said:The first thing I thought when I saw that ad, was that plane has no wings...
Emoni said:You are misunderstanding this poll and post.
The exact angle of impact is not the point of this post. It is the image and the advertisement itself.
If you want to get SUPER technical, you can say that it is possible to hit the second tower of the building considering that the picture as taken at an extremely slight angle, thus it is possible for the oversized train to hit the second tower. Of course, then you can argue that the shear size of the train shows that it is far enough away from the building. Oh, but wait! You can then point out that TRAINS DON'T FLY. Thus destroying the argument. Finally you can end it with the classes Internet rebuttal and just say "JR so Photoshopped it dude!"
Come on guys...
I think Nice Gaijin explained it best when he mentioned the statement of evoking the image of 9/11. This is what the poll is about, if this sort of image is seen or not, and by who.
Mike Cash said:Did you want people's honest impressions of the poster? Or did you want everyone to just see it the way you do and express agreement?
Mike Cash said:I never got that impression at all, and as per your request in the initial post, I spent quite a while looking at it trying to figure out what was objectionable about it. I didn't see anything wrong with it.