Ewok85
先輩
- 14 Nov 2003
- 2,401
- 44
There are stricter guidelines to whaling than for instance deer hunting or the kangaroo cull.
The word cull is used with Kangaroo because kangaroos are killed off to keep the number down. To make it plain and simple - THERE IS TOO MANY.
As for animal welfare what is more cruel? To be raised in a factory farm only to get killed so that we can eat hamburgers and wear our sneakers made of leather or be free and then get unlucky and end up being a whale hamburger. I would much rather be a free whale than a meat producing bull.
You are a thinking person who has desires, goals and the ability to make the logical steps required to know that there is better. A cow does not have this, not even close. Meanwhile dolphins and some small whales have shown amazing intelligence which cows do not - social order, language control and understanding, tool use, self awareness etc.
If it is environmental reasons. Whale meat is much more environmental friendly than eating beef, lamb or pork.
Hah, thats ridiculous. Millions of cows, sheep and pigs have been bred in captivity to provide for us. Whale numbers are unknown, unmanaged and can be severely harmed by just picking them off without taking careful consideration. Do you know how many female whales were killed last year by the Japanese whaling fleet? Do you realise how many were pregnant or calving? The number isn't insignificant. The issue is compounded by the fact that whales live far longer lives than cows or sheep, gestation and calving periods are far longer as well.
Whales face a far greater risk of extinction, which is the bigger environmental risk.