I don't think there's a country in the world -- certainly no developed country, anyway -- that doesn't have some kind of bizarre, frightening ultra-right fringe, which is why I find Crazy Russian's singling out of the Baltic countries bizarre.
Even the US had a white supremacist run for president in the late 80s.
David Duke. That crakkka stuff is still alive in the US of hate. unfortunately.
But that alone would not mean a country is neo-fascist.
Today real fascists wouldn't advertise. And may or may not be racist like the German fascists that called themselves nazis. They'd certainly have some sort of supremacist streak in them. Maybe they'd believe their nation was blessed by god to be above all others? And they might be deluded by their technology as proof of others' backwardness. Afterall, war, famine, disease is all "over there" and "they" just can't seem to get it together. By golly. (never mind real history with the cia at the behest of US presidents keeping other nations fighting, arms sales, etc.... no. that doesn't have anything to do with why it looks so scary "out there")
I agree that the word "fascism" or "fascist" has been way over and mis used.
For me, when I heard that certain winners of certain wars hired war criminals and kept them from prosecution, those countries' credibility went to absolute zero in my eyes. And that it was more than just "my side" good no matter what.
Non-suck-up historian Howard Zinn asks the following:
"But what about fascism -- as idea, as reality? Were its essential elements -- militarism, racism, imperialism -- now gone?"
The US has certainly militarism. Witness the toys many of us grew up with: action figures and video games. And now the US spends more on military then the rest of the world combined. combined. the rest of the world.
Racism, certainly is still present in the US. in individuals as well as policy. When there's as much drugs in a Manhattan office building as there is in a ghetto and who goes to jail?
Imperialism? The sourge of the post war years hidden behind politically correct terminology such as "the ruskies are out to get us" and the "free market". And now the facade is dropping with a number of pundits actually having the gall to claim there is something remote to honor to go with imperialism. How disgusting. Like there's such a thing as a benevolent dictator? There is no benevolent imperialism.
What were we talking about again?
democracy - in japan.
compared to say the US.
if there is the claim that the US has it I see no reason why one cannot claim Japan does too. however the US does not.
little repression does not a democracy make.
if people don't make a fuss, there is nothing to repress.
maybe people are happy having their government in the hands of corporations? maybe the corporations own most of the media and any innovative idea is laughed away as unrealistic or fringe because, afterall, if it was a serious idea someone in the capital city would have brought it up.
nor does voting alone. especially when the choices are chose for you.
the Soviet Union had elections but only one party to vote for.
The US has 2 parties that supposedly represent different ideas.
Like maybe disagreements on 'where to place the deck chairs on a sinking ship'. ha!
And Japan as had a defacto one party state thanks to the US funnelling money for years to the LDP.
blah, blah, blah.
a lot of this stuff is connected.
but democracy cannot be forced upon anyone.
that is why we do not have work place democracy yet
like they do to some extent in Mondragon or with independent unions
that do not mirror the top-down corporate model.
blah, blah, blah tangent, blah, tangent, tangent....