MeAndroo
先輩
- 29 Jul 2004
- 767
- 16
I admit you never stated it explicitly, but I certainly felt it was implied by organizing your post as you did, namely:m477 said:Not at all, learning the kana was mainly homework; there's no need to waste class time on rote memorization.
Uh, okay.... Show me where I said it did.
If that was not your intention, it was certainly a misunderstanding on my part, but saying learning 2000 characters will take a while, and using pace of program in your next sentence led me to believe they were related, paragraph breaks and all.Not at all, I think that is perfectly reasonable. It should only take a few days to learn the kana and their usage; so after that you might as well move on to kanji right away since learning the ~2,000 standard characters is going to take awhile.
If the program moves any slower than that, Japanese majors won't even be able to pass JLPT L2 by the time they graduate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeAndroo
I'm curious to know how many kanji were on that first test. I'll assume it's a regular 4 hour/week class, which means you're either skimping on grammar or pronunciation practice, which is especially necessary in a beginning language course.
Not at all, learning the kana was mainly homework; there's no need to waste class time on rote memorization.
I certainly don't expect Japanese teachers to sit around holding up flashcards, but not giving the kana more than a cursory look in the first week still seems a bit excessive to me. The kana aren't difficult, but I appreciated increased focus on this most basic writing form.
I'm still curious to know which kanji were on that first test, if you remember.
Quote:
Originally Posted by m477
If the program moves any slower than that, Japanese majors won't even be able to pass JLPT L2 by the time they graduate.
I have to say that I kind of agree with m477 here. I think most Japanese classes could benefit from being more intensive and moving at a faster pace. I think a student graduating with a four-year degree in the language should possess a certain degree of proficiency in the language, and JLPT L2 isn't a bad standard to go by in this case.
I have no issue with JLPT2 being used as a measuring stick. Like I said, some upper level students were practicing for JLPT1. How they did...well, that I don't know.