If I may say so, and that is just a personal opinion: I am the only one on the Forum who was there when it all happened.
[...]
I am also well aware of what the Dutch government did wrong during the Dutch colonial days in Indonesia. But one must also see this in the context of those years when colonies were consired as normal. So today we can all call it very bad, but in those days it wasn't bad at all[...]
That makes you a valuable witness no doubt, but only for the things you have seen and experienced. Other stories differ from yours and in my view it is the whole that determines the complete picture.
Those days, as you call them, however, lasted until the Japanese occupation and beyond. Until the Japanese invasion the situation on the Dutch plantations in Sumatra never really improved and neither did the circumstances for the natives convicted to forced labor. The other day I saw a recently made documentary showing a lady, who, I guess, was in her late seventies, being interviewed about the time she lived in D.E.I. If her answers are any indication, to her those days never passed.
As for colonies being considered normal, one could wonder why it wasn't considered normal for Japan? After all, they booted out the Dutch and became the new colonial masters. Like all the colonial powers, Japan built her own colonial empire in Asia. Considering the time line, Japan started to move on Korea in 1873, the Dutch invaded Aceh in 1883. You might say they're more or less contemporary.
One thing that is rarely, or rather, never, mentioned in these discussions is the fact that in the mid 19th century Japan faced the very real prospect of becoming a colony or protectorate of the western powers. One could say that she only had 2 options: become a prey or a predator.
I'm not excusing or defending Japan's imperialism, but I think two measures are applied: one for the Western powers and one for Japan. Sure enough Japan's armed forces committed atrocities but so did the others. So why is Japan being bothered over it? Apologies? Many have been given. Compensation? Has been paid. Acknowledge what she did wrong? She has foresworn an army. Admit the bad things in her past? Which country does that honestly? Do they call the conquest of the west genocide in the US?
I feel sorry for your loss and the negative feelings you have towards the kempeitai and such are very understandable. And sure enough for you they're the animals that have killed your father. However, that is your own personal experience, how truthful and sad it may be it is still only part of a larger picture. And I, who was not a direct participant in that tragedy, stand apart from it and am therefore in a better position to get a more objective view of those times and people. I do see the brutality of the
kempeitai, but as I wasn't personally touched by it, I can also see the circumstances that lead them to that brutality. Mind you, it is not an excuse for it, but as I have read and heard different stories about that time and the
kempeitai I feel a more balanced and objective picture is in order.
hanachan asked me:
also want to know how you think about Comfort Women issue.
I think that the Japanese government as heir to this issue is responsible. It is evident that elements of the Japanese armed forces were involved in the setting up of the bordello's and that many of the women, if not all were coerced into working there. The discussion whether the government or army authorities were officially involved or not is an empty one. Morally they are responsible. If it is smart the Japanese government should compensate the still living comfort women and wrap up this issue in a decent way. If only to silence the critics. On the other hand I find that some of the governments criticizing Japan on this point hypocrites. If you open their closets many skeletons will fall out.