Smartphone use during non-leisure activities, such as watching videos while cooking or exercising, online learning and practicing for an e-sports tournament, will not count towards the two hours. Toyoake Mayor Koki Masafumi said he recognised smartphones were "useful and indispensable in daily life" but pointed out that some students were missing school because they refused to leave home without their phone. Adults were also sacrificing sleep or time with families so they could keep scrolling on their phones and tablets, the mayor said. More than 120 residents called and emailed local city authorities during a consultation period, according to Japanese news outlet Mainichi, with the majority (80%) not happy about the proposal. Some, however, showed support for the bill. The proposal suggests that primary school students should stop using devices by 21:00 while older students and adults should stop by 22:00.
But Koki shrugs off the backlash. For him, the ordinance is not about punishment; it's about sparking reflection. "If someone hears for two hours, they'll stop and think about how long they really use their smartphone. That's the point." The roots of the ordinance lie not in abstract theory but in the lived reality of children and families in Toyoaki. In recent years, an increasing number of students in the city have stopped attending school, often spending long hours on their smartphones at home. Koki does not blame smartphones outright, but he has seen how easily they become a crutch for lonely, isolated children.
The idea came to Masafumi Kouki, the energetic mayor of the Japanese city of Toyoake, on a summer day as he pondered rising truancy rates at local schools. Toyoake's nearly 68,000 residents, especially children, seemed increasingly addicted to their digital devices, he thought, so why not try to reduce the amount of time they spent staring at screens? Within a few days, Mr. Kouki and his staff had drafted a 2,400-character ordinance limiting the use of smartphones, tablets, game consoles and computers to two hours per day for Toyoake's residents, not counting work and school hours. The ordinance, which goes into effect on Wednesday, will make Toyoake one of the first cities in Japan to attempt to use the platform of the government to get its citizens to put down their phones.
I don't think the issue is 'screen time' per se, but what is being displayed during that time. Mobile phones have many positive aspects to them; access to this forum, for example (although it doesn't load on my phone for some reason), kanji study apps, science websites etc.
... access to this forum, for example (although it doesn't load on my phone for some reason)
Moriyama, who habitually checks LINE – an instant-messaging, news and entertainment "super app" popular in Japan – as well as TikTok, Instagram and X\, conceded that staying off the sites, or at least dramatically curtailing his usage, had been a struggle. "I spend around eight hours a day on my phone, so two hours is way too little … and not enough time for me to stay up to date with everything," he says. "In the end, I used my smartphone for an hour and 50 minutes, which is a massive reduction on my usual screen time. I used the extra time to read a book, study a little and go to the gym, so my day wasn't wasted." His colleague Tomomi Hanaoka also managed to rein in her habit. "I spend about three hours on my phone on weekdays and six or seven hours at weekends, so two hours felt very short. Most people need at least three to four hours," says Hanaoka, who usually "can't do" without LINE, TikTok and Instagram.
Good thing you can hang out here with the rest of us old(ish) farts!Got my cell phone about 3 years ago. I've turned it on about 5 times since I got it. I pay TracFone $100US a year only for calling 911 in an emergency. I think I use my landline just once or twice a month. Terrible when you outlive everyone else and no one left to talk to , LOL.
I assume the $100 Frank mentioned is for having a subscription so he can call in the first place.Aren't 'emergency calls' free in the USA?
Ah I see. That's free here (and in Europe, I think); you can make emergency calls even if you're not subscribed to a provider.I assume the $100 Frank mentioned is for having a subscription so he can call in the first place.
Without a SIM card? Well, today I learned! I've never had to call emergency services so I just assumed you needed a SIM card for it. That's pretty neat.Ah I see. That's free here (and in Europe, I think); you can make emergency calls even if you're not subscribed to a provider.
You need a SIM card but you don't need to have a monthly subscription to a phone service provider to make emergency calls. It's to avoid people with lapsed subscriptions getting into difficulty during an emergency…like having one's phone snatchedWithout a SIM card? Well, today I learned! I've never had to call emergency services so I just assumed you needed a SIM card for it. That's pretty neat.
It is free. You do not even need a SIM or a contract with any provider. This is 911 only. Even old half dead phones show 911 calls only.Ah I see. That's free here (and in Europe, I think); you can make emergency calls even if you're not subscribed to a provider.
[...] 7.1% of respondents said there was a change, 65.4% reported no change, and 27.5% noted no change but increased awareness. The city government has pointed to adverse effects of prolonged smartphone use including sleep deprivation. On sleep duration, 2.7% said there was a change, 84.6% reported no change, and 12.6% responded there was no change but they became more conscious of it.
One of the ordinance's aims is to promote "dialogue within families." The survey also asked whether the ordinance had prompted changes in family conversations or lifestyle reassessments, with 39% saying "yes" and 61% saying "no." A city official noted that about 40% found it a catalyst for changes in family dialogue, saying, "The interest shown by many citizens in the ordinance is seen as a factor, and we see it as having had a certain positive effect."
According to the survey, digital devices such as smartphones were used for two hours or more a day by: 18% of first- through third-graders and 35% of fourth- through sixth-graders at elementary school; and 65% of junior high school students. Thirty percent of the fourth- through sixth-graders at elementary school and about 40% of junior high school students said they sometimes stayed up late to use smartphones and other devices. The survey showed that parents and guardians of more than 60% of junior-class kindergartners, who are typically 3 or 4, and more than 40% of pre-kindergartners started using digital devices before their fourth birthdays. More than 20% of senior-year kindergartners, who are typically 5 or 6, used the devices for two hours or more a day, the survey showed. "The findings have shown the use of digital devices is spreading to younger ages to a greater extent than we ever thought," Toyoake Mayor Masafumi Kouki said. "We hope to step up our awareness-raising campaigns against smartphone addiction." Some 55.3% of parents and guardians said they themselves used digital devices for two hours or more on weekdays.
Coincidentally, I'm taking a break from copy-editing a paper on smartphone use and some experimental measures taken to reduce its use among young people! A few comments on the article.This didn't really work out as planned.
Toyoake drew national attention when it adopted an ordinance urging residents, especially children, to cut back on smartphone use. But a city survey suggests the nonbinding measure, which took effect in October, has so far fallen well short of its aims. Results released on 26 March showed more than 60% of junior-class kindergarten children in the city had been exposed to smartphones and other digital devices before the age of four.
Use among older children was also heavy. More than 20% of junior high school students spent 4 hours or more a day on such devices.
Toyokawa's ordinance encourages all residents to limit recreational smartphone use to no more than 2 hours a day. It also calls on elementary school pupils and younger children not to use smartphones after 9 p.m. For children aged 12-17, it recommends that screens be locked by 10 p.m. each day. The rules are advisory, not enforceable, and the survey appears to show habits have not shifted much. At least not yet.