KrazyKat said:
So I was reading a book, and a passage seems to be written in some kind of classical Japanese, using ki on i adjectives and sonata and so on.
Yes, you're right, it's written in a kind of classical style.
Anyway they seem to be using the (nai-stem)-n, ending as a positive (I think), where as normally this would definitely be a negative so I'm a bit confused. Here is a bit from the passage:
そなたらもまた、闇をまもるヒョウル<闇の守り人>とならん。
ヒョウル<闇の守り人>となりて、 母なる山の命をまもらん。
Actually, the ん here does not derive from ない as you most reasonably thought. It comes from む , which is not used much nowadays. Anyway, it can mean a number of things, but here it means 「しませんか」 or 「しなさい」. So the ならん and まもらん could be written as なりなさい and まもりなさい , respectively, to make it easier to understand.
also they use narite, there. Is that the classical from of natte?
In a word, yes. There are other pronunciation changes similar to that, too. The changing of 美しき to 美しい is similar.
Also the use of naru there between haha(?) and yama, I have an idea of what that's about but can someone give a good explanation?
This naru comes from the word なり , which is basically the same as だ or である or です. なり is a kind of verb-like word, so it gets conjugated in different circumstance. When it precedes a noun, なり becomes なる . So here, 母なる山 is the same as 母である山. Make sense?
And of taru when it is used between nouns like that, sorry no example at hand though. I don't think these are classical Japanese though?
たる here is essentially the same as the explanation above for なる ,but this time it derives from たり . There's probably some kind of nuance distinction, but as far as I know, たり and なり are for all practical purposes the same.
ふるきカンバルの王は死に、新しきカンバルの王うまれたり!
is the tari ending just the past tense?
Yes.
Thanks for your patience! Hope this isn't confusing!