たる / わ / なる

eeky

先輩
Joined
8 Jun 2010
Messages
2,431
Reaction score
22
Hi,


1. せっかく評判の高い遠くの小学校を選び、わざわざ車の送り迎えま でして通わせているのに、と憮然たる思いだった。

My translation, "It was disappointing, since we had taken great pains to choose a distant junior school with a good reputation, where our son even had to be specially dropped off and picked up each day by car."

What is the purpose of たる, and which たる is it?


2. This is part of a narrated conversation between a husband and wife about problems with their son being bullied at school. The narrator is the husband. The husband initially tried to tell the wife not to worry so much because children are always fighting. Then the wife revealed that this bullying was happening almost every day. Then the husband reflected on the fact that they had specially chosen the school, per the sentence in the previous question. Then comes:

「それで、次郎はなぐり返しているのか」と聞いたら、 案の定、していないと言う。
「なぐり返さないなら、こちらが悪い。」
「なぐり返すなんて。次郎はやさしい子だから。第一、 そんなことで問題は解決しないわよ」
私はカッときて、

a) Are these lines spoken respectively by husband, wife, husband? I'm a bit confused because I thought わ was mostly used by women, and yet it seems to be spoken by the husband?

b) In the last line, who is the subject of 解決しない? Is it 次郎?


3. 「遥かなるケンブリッジ 一数学者のイギリス」

I understand this to be a book title.

a) What does 遥かなるケンブリッジ mean? I understand it is referring to Cambridge of course, and I know 遥か means "distant", but I don't understand the purpose of なる.

b) Is 一 a punctuation dash, or does it mean something like "a" (as in the indefinite article)?

c) I don't understand the meaning created by 数学者のイギリス. The author is Japanese, by the way.
 
1)
たる is the adnominal form of a classical auxiliary verb たり. It's close to 憮然とした.

2) a)
husband, husband, wife. 案の定、していないと言う is the indirect quotation of the wife's words.

b)
問題

3)
懐かしい! The book title takes me back. I've read the book, and the same author 藤原正彦's previous book 若き数学者のアメリカ.

a)
なる is the adnominal form of a classical auxiliary verb なり. You can think it as a classical way of saying 遥かな. Incidentally, this なり is the etymology of な which is the adnominal form of the copula だ, and the conditional なら.

b)
The latter.

c)
Does 一数学者の/が/から見たイギリス make sense?
 
4c) yes, that makes sense, thanks.

By the way, how do you know that 「なぐり返さないなら、こちらが悪い。」 is said by the husband?
 
H: それで、次郎はなぐり返しているのか。
W: していない(The words the wife actual said would be something like いいえ、なぐり返してないわ.)
H: なぐり返さないなら、こちらが悪い。
W: なぐり返すなんて。次郎はやさしい子だから。第一、 そんなことで問題は解決しないわよ。

Don't you think this flow of the conversation is natural? (And of course my interpretation is also from the third and fourth line. These are male and female wording, respectively.)
 
I'm sure your interpretation will be correct, but I have been having difficulty assigning lines to husband and wife in a way that presents a consistent point of view from each of the parties. The line 次郎はやさしい子だから, for example, struck me as critical of the boy, and suggesting that he should stand up for himself more, which elsewhere seems to be the husband's position, not the wife's. The whole section is quite a bit longer, and unfortunately it is a bit too much for me to copy in full.
 
次郎はやさしい子だから、なぐり返すなんてできるわけないじゃない。

This is just a description about Jirō, not critical of him or giving suggestion to him.

This is just a description about Jirō, not critical of him or giving suggestion to him.
 
Back
Top Bottom