... someone stated that this made the US complicit, "10% responsible..." Which doesn't make sense to me. It seemed to me a attempt to play down the issue and shift part of the responisibility.
Next time Sabro I might suggest reading the replies that were made to my thread about the percentages....

, there should be no confusion.
Unfortunately the term Comfort Women has been tossed around so much that it is rather easy to get confused about what it is.
Comfort Women were the women that were or refers to the women that were forced into, coerced, sold into service or because of economic situations of the time, placed or forced into brothel's firstly servicing the Japanese Imperial Army from 1928 or so until 1945. It seems that the two "Comfort Women" and professional prostitutes worked together.
This also includes the Japanese women were put into service after WWII and the period of 7 months that the US Military used the Japanese serviced and run brothel's here in Japan. There evidently were both prostitutes and "Comfort Women" together there as well.
According to the dictionary the definition is;
A woman forced to serve as a prostitute for Japanese servicemen during World War II.
Which I also think should be ammended to include "
women forced to serve as prostitutes for the US Military right after WWII "as well.
Prostitutes are prostitutes as you know. However there are those here that will argue that once, the women in the above mentioned paragraph defining comfort women, started "working" at the military brothel's they became prostitutes because they were paid for their work.
I for one disagree with that, just because they were paid didnt necessarily make them "prostitutes" in my opinion. Raping someone and then paying them for it doesn't justify the actions, only assuages the conscience of the abuser.
In a sense anyone that takes money for anything could be considered a prostitute.