inkink said:
Now if you want to talk about logic, how do you know the difference in pre and post a-bomb population is all due to the a-bomb? Did you track all of them down? How up-to-date or accureate was the pre-explosion population count? How accurate was the post-explosion count? Did everybody in Nagasaki, right after the explosion, immediately report to yoru government for a head count? Are you sure there wasn't a mass exodus from the area after the explosion? How did you count the number of people who simply left? Or committed suicide? Or died of other disease and hunger? Or criminal violence?
I think you are very close to the point I want to make. I want to say same things about Nanking issue.
inkink said:
Come back to the death count of Nanking, I have already stated, if you could start reading and stop pretending to overlook, is produced largely by records kept by philanthropy groups who buried the bodies. The number has also been corroborated by later excavations of the mass graves. This is fundamentally the same method as that used by the state of Louisiana: By counting bodies. Compared to your insane guesses, this is by far a more reliable, if not overly conservative method.
OK, you are telling right things. To fix the number of death, counting the dead body is much more reliable than guessing the number from pre & post insident. I agree with you.
So, by couting dead body, Do you know exact numbers Chinise government found at Nanking? How many number of body did philanthropy groups bury?
Please let me know the number, not like 100,000 or 200,000.
Also, please tell me how do you know the cause of death of each people, and who killed them if it is the case.
inkink said:
You call an international military tribunal a "news paper",
I am sorry for my misunderstanding. I thought it as "International Tribune". However, still this report include the number of death was sent to the court, this report is not took into as evidence to proscute war crime, since there is no verification.
inkink said:
What happened in Nanking is difficult for any Chinese to talk about, even today. Usually I avoid discussions/debates such as this one has been since it doesn't seem to produce anything positive. Personally I strongly dislike any gory details about violence and killings. I believe if we as humans focus all our beings on the darkness of the past we are simply placing a dark curse on our children.
Well. I should have been more polite with Chinese people when talking about this kind of issue.
Today is the day A-bomb was dropped at Nagasaki, and killed many civilian instantly, and sufferting much more lator. I know That kind of scar stays very long among the left family and nation, and how Chinese people felt about Nanking issue.
When Nanking city was in the battle, I think there was many confusion and caos, and fighting between Japanese and Chinese military caused death of many civilians. There was a report from Japanese army saying they excuted Chinese spy who did not ware army uniform, and there may be civilians too. (From current standard, it is not accepeted at all, but it was typical fact every countries doing to excute spy at that time. )
I accept there was civilian death during the battle, and killing civilians by confused Japanese military. But I cannot believe there was "massacure of 100,000 or 200,000" untill I have the answer to the question I asked you.
Nevertheless, I felt guilty about Japanese army's wrong practice in Nanking though.
inkink said:
I, as well as most other Chinese, have no interest to get into any conflict with Japan. We simply want to build a better and secure home, a prosperous and open society for the children of today and tomorrow.
I agree 100%. But when I saw the chinise military budget growth more than 10% for long time, 2.5 million army, Nuclear misile targeting Japan, Chinese Submarin invading Japan sea teritory, I scare a littel. Japan have 180k army, and 80% of military budget is used for just salary, and decreasing for 6 years in row.
inkink said:
With Japan's political leaders stubbornly insisting on worshipping class A war criminals, with some of you guys calling japan's war atrocities "JUST UPLIFT of WAR", with japanese right wing nuts continuously denying its war past and scratching the painful historical scars in the Chinese and Koreans collective memory, and yet wondering at the same time why they are hated, it makes one doubt what is Japan's future.
Prime Minister Koizumi always said he goes Yasukuni Shrine not for Class A was Ciminals, but for praying to commit peace.
I annualy visited Yasukuni Shrine, but also not for worshipping Class A War Crimanls, but to pray for all the Japanese people who died to protect my country.
There are some 2 or 3 million people name on the list, and there may be somebody who should not be on the list. But I go there since it is the simbolic shrine for typical people who sacrificed their life for country, not like other shrine which is worshipping some kind of old Japanese God.
You may not understand why I am doing this, but I also cannot understant you put very large Mao paintings at The tien an men square, who killed much more Chinese than Japanese military during "The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution" and "窶佚・窶禿エツ進" , but it is you and Chinese people's choice, so I do not make any complaint. I hope you and Chinese people does not make any complaint regarding Yasukuni Shrine, even you cannot understand it.