I've been having an argument with someone (not on this forum) about the spelling of a certain word.
Now, as most of you know, sometimes, the romajified versions of words can be simplified for example, Toukyou to Tokyo.
But lets say the title is originally
"Patapata Hikousen no Bouken"
isn't it wrong to simplify that to
"Patapata Hikosen no Boken" ?
The reason why I argued that it was wrong is because
Bouken = Adventure and Boken = Maternal Rights.
Would you say that it's correct to simplify it to
"Patapata Hikosen no Bouken" and not Boken?
Personally, in this case, I wouldn't simplify it at all. But I just wanted to make sure if simplifying the word Bouken to Boken is indeed incorrect...
Now, as most of you know, sometimes, the romajified versions of words can be simplified for example, Toukyou to Tokyo.
But lets say the title is originally
"Patapata Hikousen no Bouken"
isn't it wrong to simplify that to
"Patapata Hikosen no Boken" ?
The reason why I argued that it was wrong is because
Bouken = Adventure and Boken = Maternal Rights.
Would you say that it's correct to simplify it to
"Patapata Hikosen no Bouken" and not Boken?
Personally, in this case, I wouldn't simplify it at all. But I just wanted to make sure if simplifying the word Bouken to Boken is indeed incorrect...