What is a profile infraction?
- Thread starter DoctorP
- Start date
- Status
- 21 May 2003
- 14,310
- 4,404
Hummmm???
Maybe it has something to do with the large erect penis your avatar is holding up ???
Uncle Frank
PS - Is chat ready to go yet ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Maybe it has something to do with the large erect penis your avatar is holding up ???
Uncle Frank
PS - Is chat ready to go yet ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Last edited by a moderator:
Glenn
一切皆苦
- 8 Jan 2004
- 7,842
- 200
I believe that's the "it doesn't fall under any other category so I'll pick one that has the amount of points I think you should be penalized for what you did" category. Sorry I couldn't make that more concise.
P.S. I've been trying to adhere to the "one space after all punctuation rule" lately. It's working out pretty well so far, I think.
P.S. I've been trying to adhere to the "one space after all punctuation rule" lately. It's working out pretty well so far, I think.
- 17 Jul 2002
- 5,907
- 385
This has nothing to do with your profile. It is when an admin or mod give you an infraction by clicking first on your name (accessding your profile), then clicking on "give infraction" rather than on "give infraction" directly from the problematic post.
- 17 Sep 2005
- 6,017
- 1,970
Sabro, be careful! You're walking on a razor's edge there!
CC1, what did you do to "deserve" an infraction, if I may ask?
CC1, what did you do to "deserve" an infraction, if I may ask?
DoctorP
先輩
- 3 Jun 2004
- 2,193
- 93
- Thread starter
- #9
Let's see...first I pointed out the obvious...in hopes that someone would go back and correct their improper English.
Then I posted in a thread that I obviously wasn't welcome in...even though the post in question was relevent to the thread. Although now you can not confirm that since the post was deleted.
- 17 Sep 2005
- 6,017
- 1,970
Wow. Sounds like they let you off easy this time!
- 17 Sep 2005
- 6,017
- 1,970
Really? I couldn't see it. Maybe I was just looking at the wrong place...
I have no qualms getting an infraction, considering that it seems based on someone's whim, and hence meaningless (unless, of course, you fall in one of Kohlberg's Pre-conventional levels).
That said, I wonder when the admin went downhill. I kinda liked it when Maciamo was more active, but I guess it can't be helped now...
That's horrible! Me, whether or not I merited an infraction, given the overall barbaric atmosphere given by some of the other members, that doesn't mean anything, as I said before... Consistency doesn't exactly have a strong place in this forum, at least it looks that way with the admins.
That said, I wonder when the admin went downhill. I kinda liked it when Maciamo was more active, but I guess it can't be helped now...
That's horrible! Me, whether or not I merited an infraction, given the overall barbaric atmosphere given by some of the other members, that doesn't mean anything, as I said before... Consistency doesn't exactly have a strong place in this forum, at least it looks that way with the admins.
- 15 Mar 2002
- 16,758
- 2,298
You must be possessed of an astounding degree of perspicacity to have independently noticed that on short acquaintance. My hat is off to you, sir.
Elizabeth
先輩
- 22 Apr 2003
- 9,839
- 135
It isn't a question really of Maciamo being more active or not, assuming he is not the admin in question, but with the vagueness of the rules and lack of accountability or oversight.
This is the first I've heard of an infraction system, though. If it is intended as an early warning system that is definately an improvement on hasty or unpremeditated bannings.
- 5 Feb 2005
- 7,694
- 627
Mods, and Admins, help me out, my English isn't perfect; That's plural isn't, not singular.
If you want to say something about this forums team members say the name, and complain, or keep it singular, but don't say Admins instead of admin because there are 3 admins in here, and you guys are talking about 1 of them, not all 3.
Then the Mods, and advisors (who have the same power as mods) that are 13 persons.
So don't come with AdminS and modS. Because A lot of this guys are trying to keep this forum happy for everyone.
Sorry just needed to say this.
If you want to say something about this forums team members say the name, and complain, or keep it singular, but don't say Admins instead of admin because there are 3 admins in here, and you guys are talking about 1 of them, not all 3.
Then the Mods, and advisors (who have the same power as mods) that are 13 persons.
So don't come with AdminS and modS. Because A lot of this guys are trying to keep this forum happy for everyone.
Sorry just needed to say this.
- 15 Mar 2002
- 16,758
- 2,298
You are quite right, of course.
Are you familiar with the English expression about "it only takes one bad apple to ruin a barrel"?
sabro
後輩
- 23 Apr 2004
- 1,006
- 35
I am entirely cautious. I deserve my infractions! So does Senseiman, CC1, and Mike Cash. We are all mere pygmies in the shadows of giants! (Sabro is no longer really here... merely his corporial remains animated in a goulish charade... typing away.) J-Pop rules! Happy happy, joy joy and all is harmonius and non-confrontational. All opinions must be grey and atheistic. Long live unrestricted administration and moderation! Drive away the godly infidels who proclaim diverse ideas! All come into the oneness of mutual agreement!
Elizabeth
先輩
- 22 Apr 2003
- 9,839
- 135
Huh ? Twisted is still involved ? Aren't there only 2 now ? If this doesn't get me an infraction, I give up.
- Status
