*sigh* Only sort of. Those are conjugated forms of those verbs...now I think I may understand why people dislike Rosetta Stone...it's sort of like it's skipping you ahead without the basics.
かぶる [kaburu] is "to wear (a hat)"
はく [haku] is "to wear (pants)"
Additionally:
きる [kiru] is "to wear (a shirt)" (also sort of general)
する [suru] is "to wear (accessories)"
Those are the dictionary or plain forms. They are exceedingly useful and important to know and you probably should have learned those first. What you saw, "kabutte" and "haite" are the te-forms of those verbs which, generally speaking, allow them to function as conjunctions or to accept an auxiliary verb. In your case, I'm guessing they were followed by "imasu", "masu", or "iru". That would be the progressive tense, similar to "ing" in English.
Well, you've had the pleasure of meeting multiple Japanese words that are covered by one word in English. And now you have the pleasure of meeting different Japanese words that are read the same but have radically different meanings...Oh, and one of the two irregular verbs in Japanese.
きる(着る)[kiru] "to wear"
くる (来る)[kuru] "to come"
くる is irregular and its te-form is the same as きる (to wear). There's another きる(切る)that means "to cut", but its te-form is きって.
So きています[kiteimasu] does mean "wearing" (progressive tense) assuming that it makes sense in context.
And if you wanted the ます form of きる it would be きます (once again, the same as くる)...unless you want that on the "to cut" きる, then it would be きります.
Is it wrong that I'm getting just a little kick out of introducing someone to some of the unique qualities of Japanese?
yes, it was followed by masu. funny thing, is after talking with you guys, i figured out that kiteimas meant "to wear" (shirt), when i drew it out in the translator it came back "to come". .....seems like a pretty big boner to have the phrase be kiteimasu, when it clearly should be kiruimasu.
this is the first time that I have a genuine beef with Rosetta stone... but how it works, is that it teaches you the language like you would learn it as a child. they wouldn't spell out for you the differences, they would just point out and tell you. Rosetta stone just shows me without explaining it, I understand what they are trying to do, maybe the order that i'm doing the exercises in is messing me up.
No...as thirty minutes spent with any material that actually teaches Japanese conjugation would reveal.
You're REALLY cheating yourself by not using a proper textbook, much as I hate to keep hammering this same tired old point, because with a very few exceptions the only thing more regular than Japanese conjugation is an atomic clock. You learn a few simple rules and you're pretty much done and can apply them to practically every new verb you encounter in Japanese. (Adjectives also conjugate, by the way).
No....that is the LIE of Rosetta Stone and why it SUCKS, not how it "works".
They use the seemingly sensible but in fact utterly bogus notion of teaching you just the way a child would learn and it does three things for them:
1. Lets them put out a half-baked product with no actual "teaching" (explaining) taking place,
2. Lets them jack up the price.
3. Makes the consumer think "well...it must be me, I guess" when the thing doesn't work.
Adults do not and can not learn a language like children do. Humans are "hardwired" to pick up language when we are very young, but the ability atrophies as neurological changes take place in the developing brain. If this weren't the case, you would expect adults who have moved to Japan to pick up Japanese like natives in a year or two, with little to no effort. Ask anybody here if it they have ever known that to be the case. You're not an infant and your brain doesn't work like the brain of an infant (most of the time, anyway). You're not going to just intuit Japanese conjugation, and other aspects of grammar/syntax just from looking at a bunch of pictures and listening to the audio files the thieves at Rosetta Stone sold you. Ain't gonna happen, so don't beat yourself up when it doesn't.Rosetta Stone may or may not be useful as secondary reinforcing material; I don't know. But I do know that it is crap primary material and that the time and effort spent in trying to pick up anything from it would be far more productively used in doing a few lessons from Genki or Minna no Nihongo or practically any other proper textbook on the market.
That being the case, then, at least go do the lessons on verbs.
It's really not so bad. There are two groups of verbs, and then two irregular verbs, する and 来る.it is a little intimidating, any advice before i dive into it? I am going to do some studying on Verbs outside of those books. any suggestions or advice as i dive in?
What books are you using that "verbs" is a specific chapter(s)? (!!!)
There is a difference between reference/grammar "dictionary" type books and textbooks.
For example you might get a reference book with a big chart of conjugations but this is not a good way to initially learn the conjugations - just something you can check back on if you forget.
A textbook (or similar resource) would normally slowly introduce verbs with conjugations/patterns as it goes through (alongside appropriate vocabulary and other parts of grammar like particles). e.g. first explain "masu" form in one of the first chapters, then past tense in another chapter, and then te-form later on - probably taking a few chapters to go over multiple uses of the te-form since it is the foundation of a number of useful sentence patterns.
I linked a couple of things earlier - have you looked at them? If you are only using Rosetta Stone for listening practice, something like Erin's Challenge would be a lot better - the skits there have transcriptions (in romaji, kana, or with kanji if you prefer) and translations which can be turned on/off.
As a contrast, I want to say that I started with the Japanese for Busy People texts. It was the text used at the Japanese governments' Japanese Cultural Centre where I first introduced myself to Japanese. And those texts start with the ~masu form of the verb, and don't touch the dictionary/casual forms until somewhere in the second book.<snip!>
Verbs are "the basics".
I tried signing up for that JA Sensei thing yesterday so I could look at the material, but so far no mail from them so I can't access it.
The way they have the categories broken down across the top doesn't look encouraging.
You could try out the Podcast, Japanesepod101. I used to listen to it years ago, and found it interesting for language, but also cultural details. I haven't listened in a long time, but I decided to resubscribe since I should keep studying. I never study anymore, but I'm not 100% fluent.