JerseyBoy said:
I am going to be in charge of the new facility for my employer. I am going to ban smoking in any place inside the new building after moving from the old facility. I am going to make smokers smoke outside so that I can keep the air clean inside the facility.
Why completely ban something when it is legal by law? I could never understand that. I am a smoker, but I do like others smoke in a confined space like an airplane or on a train which is why I am glad they now ban it in both Japan and the US. I am also for the banning of smoking in public places like an office or restaurant. However, there is still something enjoyable of a smoky bar or night club.
Anyway, if you force all your workers to smoke outside than your productivity will decrease as many workers will be going outside to smoke once an hour or so and will not be working. 10 minutes/cigarette at 8 hrs a day will mean almost an hour and a half of lost productivity for each smoker. That sure adds up to alot of lost productivity in the course of a year!
On the otherhand you cannot ban it completely as most people are mentally addicted to it and cannot do without a cigarette for a certain period of time. But it is still legal and should be allowed.
You should do what we did in the Japanese company I used to work at and which I helped impliment. We set up two rooms for smokers for which they could smoke in anytime they wished during the course of a day. However, there was a stipulation and that was that they would have to be working while they smoked. It could be talking to clients; it could be taking work with you to work on while you smoked; it could be having a meeting with a collegue, etc.
The point was that you couldn't just go into that room and smoke and do nothing as that was as unproductive as forcing the smokers to smoke outside doing nothing. We wished to allow them to smoke, but to be productive at the same time while not bothering the non-smokers.
It was effective and it worked and all employees, smokers and non-smokers, were satisfied.
Maybe you should consider something similar rather than forcing employees outside during the work day.