News Saitama Prefecture: leaving kids at home alone is child abuse

thomas

Unswerving cyclist
Admin
Joined
14 Mar 2002
Messages
21,056
Reaction score
18,912
Saitama Prefecture passed an ordinance that defines leaving children alone at home, even for short periods, as abuse. The move was prompted by recent reports from around the nation of young children dying in cars or at home after being left alone while their parents or guardians went out.

Of course, there are no penalties.

Even though there are no penalties in the ordinance, opposition assembly members took issue with the measure, saying it only added more pressure on parents already struggling to find a day care center for their young offspring. The measure, submitted to the assembly on 4 October, would ban adult guardians from leaving children in the third grade or younger alone at home. As for fourth to sixth graders, parents would be obligated to make efforts to ensure an adult is always on the premises. In a controversial provision, the measure obligates other Saitama residents to report cases if they notice young children alone at home. The 6 October session of the welfare, public health and medical care committee was inundated with questions about the proposal because of the vagueness of the wording. Among other actions, the proposal defined abuse as leaving young children alone at home or elsewhere while no guardians were present.

 
That's pretty ridiculous to create a law that just pressures parents and mandates neighbors to spy and rat on each other, with zero actual consequences or attempts on the government's behalf to solve the problem they're trying to address. Does Saitama have a government or is it just a big HOA?

How about creating an affordable licensing and in-home daycare dispatch agency that makes sure that there ARE vetted, qualified adults on hand to watch kids when necessary?
 
Now, that was a quick turn. After a backlash from parents, Saitama Prefecture gave up on its plans for an ordinance that prohibited leaving children unattended at home.

In withdrawing the proposal, the LDP said the philosophy behind the bill was not yet fully grasped in the sense that it was intended to help society to safeguard children. The bill stated that even letting children go to school or play at a neighborhood park by themselves would constitute an act of neglect. Working and single parents, local PTAs and opposition assembly members blasted the proposal as unrealistic, saying LDP politicians were out of touch. The proposed ordinance would have covered third graders, 8- or 9-year-olds, and younger children, and oblige the public to report cases of "neglect" they came across. No penalty was envisaged for breaching the rules. However, Tamura suggested earlier that a penalty would be introduced in the future, if necessary.

 
Back
Top Bottom