- 22 Feb 2008
- 18,266
- 4,926
I would say (それを)なんと呼ばせたいですか?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would say (それを)なんと呼ばせたいですか?
Another expression for "What do you want it to be called?" is それをなんと呼んでほしいですか?
You can use ~をなんて/なんと呼ばれたいですか? only when the object is the addressee's possessions. (This is a kind of indirect passive; what's called 持主受身 "the possesser's passive".)
e.g.
飼い犬をなんと呼ばれたいですか?
~を(・・・と)呼ばれたい can't be used for the object that is nothing to do with the subject, whereas ~を(・・・と)呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい can be used relatively freely.
Oh, then that becomes my long-standing error also for assuming something like (みんなに)何て呼ばれている?was acceptable in extremely casual situations, along with 「どう (or なんて) 呼んだらいい?」 etc.Another expression for "What do you want it to be called?" is それをなんと呼んでほしいですか?
You can use ~をなんて/なんと呼ばれたいですか? only when the object is the addressee's possessions. (This is a kind of indirect passive; what's called 持主受身 "the possesser's passive".)
e.g.
飼い犬をなんと呼ばれたいですか?
~を(・・・と)呼ばれたい can't be used for the object that is nothing to do with the subject, whereas ~を(・・・と)呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい can be used relatively freely.
CP seems to mean coupling; "making characters a couple".
カップリング (同人) - Wikipedia
(all in Japanese)
I guess 地雷CP means "a couple (of characters) a reader can't accept." Does this fit the context?
They are indeed. It must be the jet lag since I still don't see a problem with 恋人に/孫に/私に etc なんて呼ばれたいですas the person being addressed is able to properly respond with ~~ と/名前で呼ばれたい when referencing their own name.呼ばれたい and 呼ばれている are completely different, aren't they?
Probably wikipedia is not the place. I just googled the word and read some pages with expecting there to be a hint.Do you happen to know of any websites that explain acronyms like CP? I see them a lot, but never find much in terms of useful explanations when I try looking them up. Is the Japanese wikipedia the best place to go for that sort of thing?
I never say there's a problem in (自分を)なんて呼ばれたいですか. I said that "You can use ~をなんて/なんと呼ばれたいですか? only when the object is the addressee's possessions" and "~を(・・・と)呼ばれたい can't be used for the object that is nothing to do with the subject". Thus, you can say neither 僕の犬をなんて呼ばれたいですか nor オランド大統領をフランソワと呼ばれたい. On the other hand, オランド大統領を(親しみを込めて)フランソワと呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい can make sense in a context.They are indeed. It must be the jet lag since I still don't see a problem with 恋人に/孫に/私に etc なんて呼ばれたいですas the person being addressed is able to properly respond with ~~ と/名前で呼ばれたい when referencing their own name.![]()
Oh, yes basically I misread the OP's follow up but the distinction follows in the same way in English between what do you want to be called and the answer to what I want/what "should" it/him/her to be called. 呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい/呼んでね etc is preferred when the term under consideration is in common use or to what has been decided on by the speaker in particular for the self, others or objects. (呼び方が決まっているのなら)Probably wikipedia is not the place. I just googled the word and read some pages with expecting there to be a hint.
I never say there's a problem in (自分を)なんて呼ばれたいですか. I said that "You can use ~をなんて/なんと呼ばれたいですか? only when the object is the addressee's possessions" and "~を(・・・と)呼ばれたい can't be used for the object that is nothing to do with the subject". Thus, you can say neither 僕の犬をなんて呼ばれたいですか nor オランド大統領をフランソワと呼ばれたい. On the other hand, オランド大統領を(親しみを込めて)フランソワと呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい can make sense in a context.
I think you'd better to read the OP's post more carefully. The original sentence is それで、なんて呼ばれたいですか? なんて呼ばれたいですか has a different nuance from なんて呼んでほしいですか, therefore the author chose this saying whether it is less common or not. Don't you think so?Oh, yes basically I misread the OP's follow up but the distinction follows in the same way in English between what do you want to be called and the answer to what I want/what "should" it/him/her to be called. 呼んでほしい/呼ばせたい/呼んでね etc is preferred when the term under consideration is in common use or to what has been decided on by the speaker in particular for the self, others or objects. (呼び方が決まっているのなら)
As Akazukin-san(chan?) explained correctly, hiragana is preffered when used in subordinate clauses, meaning when, while, and so on.Hello.
I realized that とき is frequently written in hiragana and not in kanji 時.
I wonder why because this kanji is quite simple (and this word is used a lot).
It seems to me that とき is more frequently written when just after a verb (as in : 新しい家を買うときは、よく調べてから買いましょう。)
Maybe it is nothing but an impression of mine, but I still wanted to ask.
Thank you.
ありがとうございます。I would go with どうわ for the Brothers Grimm and Hans Christian Anderson. おとぎばなし fits a more typical genre of European fairy tales with kings, castles, princesses and むかしばなし is generally reserved for traditional Japanese stories from the past grouped under "folk tales" - fables, legends, sagas etc (although modifiable with "Western" (Yousei) in some instances). Sorry if it is brief but this has been gone over rather thoroughly here in the past so a search of this site with a particular title translation in mind might be more productive .![]()
Akazukin-chan sounds good ^^As Akazukin-san(chan?) explained correctly, hiragana is preffered when used in subordinate clauses, meaning when, while, and so on.
It could mean several things. Describe the situation.
Right.So just for the record, it can also be a Japanese tale (with princesses, castles etc.), right?
Yes, that's right. That's 俺の寿命も長くないな "I have little time left to live."OK I'll try.
As I said the scene is rather static, because the charcter just sits and thinks. ^^
He's a fugitive, ligthly injured, taking shelter in a shed, he seems quite desperate too.
It's been raining the whole night, in the scene we see a shot of the rain still falling outside. In the next panel the charcter says to himself:
...やまなきゃ
いいなんて
And on the next one:
俺も長くないな...
And that's the end of the scene. I hope that helps. If not, I'll be grateful for just examples of possible meanings of that sentence. Does it refer to the time aspect?