Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
てめーらの方がよっぽどあくまだろーがOhh! I didn't see it was smaller than the rest until you mentioned it Im reding up from down for the first time so it's hard to see that, haha. The context is:
てめ一らの方が よっぽど あ〈まメごろ一が
Can you understand just 起こしに来ない? も is for emphasis "even".a translation for 起こしにも来ないし, would be nice as well please![]()
てめーらの方がよっぽどあくまだろーが
よっぽど means "much more (close to)" in that case.
Can you understand just 起こしに来ない? も is for emphasis "even".
I'm talking about し at the end of the sentence/clause.し is used to list actions like ~たり.
起こし is the -masu stem of a transitive verb 起こす, not an intransitive 起きる, thus, the subject of it is also his sister. (BTW, it' not a conditional.)
Then, the answer is no. Any nominalizer is not required for a noun clause in Classical Japanese, thus, it's not omission.
1階から3階までいつも"満車"の表示が出ています。Here is an excerpt from a big story in my textbook
この方法は大成功でした。今では上のほうほど早くいっぱいになって、1段から3段までいつも"万社"の表示が出ています。少しでも安くなるならエレベーターなんてなくてもいいと考える人が多いのでしょう。どれくらい安ければ。不便でもかまわないと考えるか、それが問題です
Im having trouble making sense of this sentence. If someone can give me hints, is the second part saying "Whether you think its convenient or alright. [Its still a problem]
I believe he is talking about a way of thought (to solve the question). It's considered that when not to use it is common/normal/usual, the situation is not called "omission". It might be similar to the existence of "the subject" in Japanese grammar.Well, then... I guess either this guy is wrong or I'm not exactly understanding what he's saying. It sure seems like he's saying that head nouns get omitted. Maybe it's just because it's a beginners' lesson. The pertinent part starts around 3:10.
Something like "let them go away without noticing our existence and can stay here safely"
It doesn't make sense, including 傷く無過去分かって.
Not quite. It's 傷つく, not 傷つける, and it's more of a habitual action that something that was done at the end (冷たくしてしまう, not 冷たくしてしまった).
How would you word it?
頼むから引かないでくれAlso can someone tell me in
頼むけえ 引かんといてくれ
what does the 引かんと~ part means here, all the definitions I found sound weird in this context
引く/曳く/牽く(ひく)の意味 - goo国語辞書ひく
㋕(俗語)相手に関心や興味を持たなくなる。 相手から気持ちが離れる。「これを口にすると女性が―・く」
夕日がまぶしくて、見ていられなかったアイツの笑顔をalso can someone tell me if this makes sense I heard this, but I don't know if I heard it right
夕日がまぶしくて、見ていられなかったアイツ笑顔を、すでに勝負は決まっていたかもしれない
I'm kind of iffy about the last line its pretty fast
The present form of an action verb doesn't express the present state of it in Japanese. In this case, it's a habitual action, as Glenn-san pointed out.On the latter point, I believe one is present, and one is simply past tense, is it not?