たら conditinal doesn't always mean "if". It can refer to a fact, too. In that sentence, 寒いと思った is a fact and 雪 is the cause of it.寒いと思ったら雪かいwww
My friend posted this on facebook. I don't get what hes trying to say is かい here か as well. It uses the "if" conjugation, so what is he saying
If I think its cold, will it snow? lol ( Just my guess, this seems weird to say though)
つぅこと, not つっこと, as you copied and pasted.今年の夏を作ってくのは俺たち‼ つぅことで先取りしてやったんだよ
つっこと, what does this do?
増えているんだよThen theres a picture of my friend with someone else and this is the caption
ふえてんだよ - This from any verb?
付き合ってなんかしないで doesn't make sense unless there is a pause between て and な, just like 付き合って、なんかしないで. 付き合ってなんか（い）ないぜ, maybe?絶対に田中と付き合ってなんかしないで！
Is this saying " I'm definitely not going out with tanaka!"
I don't know the context exactly, but it seems "I can't believe that."どうしても思えないしさ... - "I don't even know what to think anymore..."
Look up 気まま in your dictionary.
見える means "to seem" here, and the subject of it is Eba(Eva).
"Although it it seems that eba is selfish, She is actually always considerate of others.. etc".
I think 見えて and 見えても are both equally common.Is there anyone else who feels that 気ままなように見えても would make more sense here?
It's not omission of a nominalizer but more likely the attributive form performs as a noun in Classical Japanese. For instance, in a proverb 過ぎたるは及ばざるが如し Too much is as bad as too little., 過ぎたる and 及ばざる are both treated as a noun without any nominalizer.ざる is similar to ない in meaning, and it does have a classical flavoring. It is a bit different, though, other than just that. It's an attributive. In fact, it's the attributive version of ず. What that means is that it sticks to and modifies a noun or noun phrase, so you couldn't, say, end a sentence with it. Also, it seems to be able to be used like a noun in its own right (probably through omission of the head noun, which I would assume would be こと*) in the set expression ～ざるを得ない, which I believe is JLPT 2 grammar. Well, I think it would have been. I don't know what the levels are nowadays.
*This type of omission seems to be fairly common in Classical Japanese, as you can say 故きを温ねて新しきを知る (ふるきを たずねて あたらしきを しる), for instance. This is a set expression, actually. Anyway, 古き and 新しき are attributive forms of 古し and 新し, respectively, which means they should be stuck to some noun, but those nouns have been omitted. By the way, the negative attributives would be 古からざる(物) and 新しからざる(物) , respectively.
I think 見えて and 見えても are both equally common.
Toritoribe said:It's not omission of a nominalizer but more likely the attributive form performs as a noun in Classical Japanese. For instance, in a proverb 過ぎたるは及ばざるが如し Too much is as bad as too little., 過ぎたる and 及ばざる are both treated as a noun without any nominalizer.
起こしにも来ないし makes sense?起こしに来もしねえし - "If I didnt come you would'nt wake up" ? Is this alright?
舐め切って is correct. 切って is a subsidiary verb, so hiragana きって is more common, though. In this case, ～きる means "to do completely/thoroughly". You would be able to find 舐める in your dictionary.それどころか 最近俺を舐め切って ( I am sure I heard なめきって, but i dont know if this is the kanji, also I can't find this verb in my dictionary, or is this "to start drooling" like im guessing from name)
～まくる means "to keep doing" or "to do heavily/hard".っていうか馬鹿にしまくって - What is ni shimakutte?
よっぽど[yoppodo], not よつぽど[yotsupodo], probably? (The second hiragana is smaller than the others.)mm, that could be correct it's written like this: よつほ(with a circel over it) ど I don't know how you are supose to make these so I just drew them in google translate and copied them :/ so that you could see, but I know it's not the manga cas this word is written in a manga, haha.
嘗めるの英語・英訳 - goo辞書 英和和英なめる【嘗める・舐める】
3 〔ばかにする〕
なめんなよ
Don't think you can make a fool of me!
彼はよく人をなめた態度をとる
He often acts as if he 「holds all other people cheap [thinks nothing of other people].
彼をなめてはいけない
You must not underestimate [underrate] him.